Ditto for rebuilding after a major calamity such as a tornado, hurricane, or California–type fire. That's not "good for the economy" either.
Some people years back were saying that we need to learn to subtract from GDP, citing this and other things like spending on health problems such as cancer caused by manmade pollution and chemicals in the environment. The medical profession might do well from treating the latter, but no one else does; for everyone else it's actually a cost. GDP looks at spending and not the costs that go with certain types of spending, meaning after something really bad happens to someone or his/her property.
We've had a lot of recent discussion about various engines and transmissions that are prone to catastrophic failures even with careful maintenance and driving. There's no excuse for such poor designs, unless the manufacturer believes people will just buy a replacement vehicle from it, but I for one would not buy again from that automaker after I had such an experience.