I don't the details of this particular engine, but the shim/bucket (or also called DAMB "direct acting mechanical bucket") is not uncommon in many engine applications across a variety of vehicles and equipment. Each application will be unique to a large degree.
For example, Honda uses shim/bucket in the wonderful old GL1800 Goldwing. Valve checks were to be done every 32k miles. It was not uncommon to see one or two shims needing replacement at the first check interval. However, it seems once those engines "seated in", all the subseqent checks at following intervals showed little to no adjustements needed. That's just the nature of that particular engine series. Whereas other engines, such as these discussed in the OPs thread, seem to have a greater need for getting checked.
I can't say why some shim/bucket applications are sensitive and others are not; just the nature of the beast. Better to check them at least once than not check them. Also, I'm not convinced that any oil or additive is going to significantly advance or retard the timing of the need for checks. The only way to really know if an additive has the ability to affect the cycle length is to run large scale experiments, and no one here on BITOG has the time money to do a good study with enough data to be credible.