Post-cat sensors, in general, have a longer lifespan than do pre-cat sensors. So it is quite unusual that you would have had to replace a post-cat sensor before replacing a pre-cat sensor.
Although the sensors may be identical, they perform different jobs and are not subject to the same operating conditions, which results in the difference in their lifespan.
To answer your question, one of my vehicles (1996 Ford Contour 2.5L) has, at 97,000 miles, gone through the actual dyno test at 15 and 25MPH and produced CO of 0.03% and 0.04%, respectively. Also, HC ppm readings of 9 and 13, respectively. That is with new pre-cat oxygen sensors that I replaced due to a code (for one of them) and age (for the other).
So your results look good, but I wonder what they'd be if they could have done a dyno test.