There’s no clear answer to the questions. The accepted mitigation for fuel dilution over about 3% is to go one grade higher and shorten change interval. Whether the grade increase is better than the interval reduction is up for debate as far as I have read.
Savant labs says over 2.4% “requires attention”.
Polaris considers over 3.4% “abnormal”.
The problem is that some engines seem to routinely operate over 3%, especially turbocharged and/or direct injected engines. This level of dilution seems to occur almost immediately on the first few starts after an oil change on some engines, especially in cold weather. Hondas, some Ford Ecoboosts, and Subarus come to mind.
If the mitigation were to change the oil at 3%, you’d be changing the oil near everyday with some makes. So I would be inclined to up the grade and keep the interval around 5,000 rather than excessively shorten the interval, as there is a slight wear increase at the beginning of every oil change and always the slight risk of a maintenance induced failure.
There is also debate about whether manufacturers accounted for dilution when specifying a grade for their engines. For instance the Ford 3.5L ecoboost originally specified a 5W-20 when launched in 2010 but was upped to a 5W-30 in subsequent years perhaps due to observed fuel dilution in the field, but that is speculation. Further it has been reported here that significant wear increases from fuel dilution have not been observed in studies until levels nearing 10% (4th hand info from SWRI-HPL-SubieRubieRoo-Me). 5% was mentioned by HPL as a condemnation point (change the oil). I have hit that in as little as 900 miles during cold winter months.
Savant labs says over 2.4% “requires attention”.
Polaris considers over 3.4% “abnormal”.
The problem is that some engines seem to routinely operate over 3%, especially turbocharged and/or direct injected engines. This level of dilution seems to occur almost immediately on the first few starts after an oil change on some engines, especially in cold weather. Hondas, some Ford Ecoboosts, and Subarus come to mind.
If the mitigation were to change the oil at 3%, you’d be changing the oil near everyday with some makes. So I would be inclined to up the grade and keep the interval around 5,000 rather than excessively shorten the interval, as there is a slight wear increase at the beginning of every oil change and always the slight risk of a maintenance induced failure.
There is also debate about whether manufacturers accounted for dilution when specifying a grade for their engines. For instance the Ford 3.5L ecoboost originally specified a 5W-20 when launched in 2010 but was upped to a 5W-30 in subsequent years perhaps due to observed fuel dilution in the field, but that is speculation. Further it has been reported here that significant wear increases from fuel dilution have not been observed in studies until levels nearing 10% (4th hand info from SWRI-HPL-SubieRubieRoo-Me). 5% was mentioned by HPL as a condemnation point (change the oil). I have hit that in as little as 900 miles during cold winter months.
Last edited: