Unleaded gas and electronic ignition brought us this OCI and the 30k spark plug/ tuneup interval. Longer maintenance intervals were about all the 70s had to brag about.In 1976 GM recommended 7,500 miles oil change intervals, oil filter every other oil change.
+1Yeah. I do remember.
They were a lot better than oil in the 70s…
ftfyAmerican cars sucked... the oil was fine.
Yeah, 5W-30 had a lot of VII, and more importantly, HTHS hadn't been introduced into SAE J300 yet. After HTHS was introduced into SAE J300 in the 1990s, 5W-30 became more similar to 10W-30. Even today, a 10W-30 will typically be thicker in the valvetrain because shear rates far exceed 1,000,000 s⁻¹ there (HTHS shear rate), but it is a lot less of a concern now. A synthetic 5W-30 may even be stouter than a conventional 10W-30 these days as far as the base-oil viscosity (what I call HTFS, which is extrapolated to infinite shear rate) is concerned. See my table for how 5W-30 and 10W-30 HTFS values compare.This is an oil viscosity chart from 1984, in the shop manual for a 1984 Chevy Cavalier. 5W30 then wasn't what it is today, seemingly, because they didn't want it used above 60F. Also note that 10W-40 is not listed:
View attachment 118037
GM used to strongly recommend against using 10W-40This is an oil viscosity chart from 1984, in the shop manual for a 1984 Chevy Cavalier. 5W30 then wasn't what it is today, seemingly, because they didn't want it used above 60F. Also note that 10W-40 is not listed:
View attachment 118037
The cars sucked... the oil was fine.
It's funny how parental suggestions persist throughout our lives! My dad insisted that I always use Pennzoil. To this day, I still remember those words when i enter the oil aisle, and I look for Pennzoil first. Fortunately I have at least enough common sense to realize that certifications are better determinants of oil quality than brand; sale prices or rebates (among major brands) determine what I actually buy.I wondered why my dad told me don't ever use Penzoil. I always wondered why, but to this day I won't. I actually useds PUP once - i figured its Shell now so must be OK. Still felt guilty the whole time, changed it out early.
Wear wasn’t the problem and hasn’t been for many years prior to the 80s. It was deposit control, oxidation resistance and ring sticking prevention. Extended drains exacerbated the problems.They were pretty good—with tons and tons and tons of ZDDP for API SF and API SF/CC. Back in the 1980s, Toyota recommended a 10,000-mile OCI with conventional oil. Now, it's a 5,000-mile OCI unless it's synthetic oil.
Here is actual wear and fuel-economy data for selected API SF through API SN oils.
Wear and fuel economy results for selected SF through SN oils: PCMO3 engine test
Tribology Testing Labs developed an engine test called PCMO3 in 2015, which is used to predict fuel economy & engine durability. http://www.tribologytesting.com/PCMO3-vs-Seq6E-vs-D7589-Jan2015.pdf They claim: For determining friction and wear characteristics: • Gasoline & Diesel Motor Oils...bobistheoilguy.com
Do you or anybody else remember what the oil would have looked like for the boutique brands like red line, amsoil or neo? Or they also in metal like cans or had they already converted over to plastic? All I remember when I was real little was that you changed oil every 2 or 3,000 miles religiously.They were pretty good—with tons and tons and tons of ZDDP for API SF and API SF/CC. Back in the 1980s, Toyota recommended a 10,000-mile OCI with conventional oil. Now, it's a 5,000-mile OCI unless it's synthetic oil.
Here is actual wear and fuel-economy data for selected API SF through API SN oils.
Wear and fuel economy results for selected SF through SN oils: PCMO3 engine test
Tribology Testing Labs developed an engine test called PCMO3 in 2015, which is used to predict fuel economy & engine durability. http://www.tribologytesting.com/PCMO3-vs-Seq6E-vs-D7589-Jan2015.pdf They claim: For determining friction and wear characteristics: • Gasoline & Diesel Motor Oils...bobistheoilguy.com