Originally Posted By: hpb
All the Japanese makes are reliable - Toyota, Honda, Mazda, Nissan, Subaru, Suzuki and yes, even Mitsubishi, they're all good...
Originally Posted By: Linctex
Originally Posted By: deven
..........I hear a lot about how Honda and Toyota are more reliable than other brands.
A rumor that held a lot of truth in the late 70's and all through the 80's and 90's.
Nowadays.....
I see just as many Ford and GM products with 300,000 miles on them as I do Hondas and Toyotas.
I see a LOT of F150's and F250's around here with 400,000+
You can thank ISO 9001 (and or other quality management systems) for that.
You must compare cost of ownership in this case to see who came out ahead...
Originally Posted By: deven
On this forum I hear a lot about how Honda and Toyota are more reliable than other brands. So my question is, of these two, which is more reliable, Toyota or Honda?
A question with no good answer.
Certain Honda models are both very reliable and very durable and the same is true for certain Toyota cars.
We've owned mainly Hondas for years and have found them to be very satisfactory in daily use.
The same would be said by most long-time Toyota buyers.
Hondas are generally sportier to drive than equivalent Toyotas, but you sure wouldn't think that if the only Honda you've ever owned was a Gen 8 Accord, or is the same vintage Camry even less entertaining?
Are you trolling here?
Originally Posted By: UncleDave
They have the potential to be the same - It comes down to the specific model and maintenance of it.
Hondas are typically (but not always) more expensive than Toyotas to maintain in that -
1. Honda has(or had) more models with belt driven cams that need changing
2. Hondas Belt driven models have a higher % of interference engine type so ignoring the change interval can have dire consequences
3. Honda more often has mechanically adjusted valve followers/tappets/forks that are almost always totally ignored
UD
4. Honda/Acura offers turbo charging (more maintenance as it ages) over Toyota/Lex who does not.
Statistically Toyota is more reliable than Honda. Consumer Reports says Toyota is consistently #1. It makes sense, anecdotally Honda went further in the turbo, DI and cvt direction. Toyota had more reliable aisin transmissions. Just a more conservative company.
I don’t think I’d ever get another Honda or Toyota vehicle again solely on brand , reputation or perceived history. I found their recent products on par except minivans compared to other offerings across all makes. The gap has really narrowed in the past 10-15 years.
Originally Posted By: madRiver
I don’t think I’d ever get another Honda or Toyota vehicle again solely on brand , reputation or perceived history. I found their recent products on par except minivans compared to other offerings across all makes. The gap has really narrowed in the past 10-15 years.
Recent products on par? With respect to reliability? Anything recent, would be hard to tell with respect to reliability. Id say Toyota sticks with what works and isnt first to market with anything. Designs are mostly outdated but hey, it seems to be working for them..so they dont need my opinion. Once you get something right you tend to stick with it for a little while..maybe the other companies are still trying to get it right