Honda Civic Si

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saab doesn't make a $50k car first of all. Saabs depreciate for several reasons. First, they are sort of a niche car for cold weather driving but Subaru has taken over that niche. Second, until recently, turbocharging had become kinda passe in expensive sedans. Third, they have a rep. for four cylinders and not much else. No one wants to buy a $40k 9-5 Aero with a 2.3 liter 4 cylinder. Fourth, they had a deserved rep. for expensive maintenance back in the 80's that has hurt them until this day. Fifth, modern EFI engines have erased many of the advantages of a low pressure turbocharged car that saab had for so many years thanks to all the pollution controls of the 70's and 80's.

My current saab is so troublefree (except for sludgy concerns) that it's about as boring as my Honda. Thankfully the turbo wakes me up every now and then.

Like I said....SAAB's are horrible. No one buy them! Wink, wink, nudge, nudge say no more.
cool.gif
cool.gif
fruit.gif


That way I won't have to spend too much on my 9-3 Aero SportCombi.
lol.gif
cheers.gif


http://www.saabusa.com/saabjsp/935/index.jsp
 
quote:

Originally posted by BrianWC:
Saab doesn't make a $50k car first of all.

Think Canadian dollars. For the convertible:

www.saab.ca

54k+. Might be a nice car, but I think I'd go with a Toyota Solara convertible for almost 20k less. Better car and more reliable.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Auto-Union:
Saabs are awesome. Can't compare to a Solara, lol...sorry.

lol... at a 60% higher MSRP it better be!

Back to the Si, can anyone list a car that can compare for the same price? If so, I'd love to know make/model. We might be in the market next year for second car and so far the Si looks to be the winner, assuming the 4 door Si is in the works for next year as rumoured. Would be the perfect mate for my CRV
wink.gif


and both cars for the price of one Saab convertible...
grin.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by webfors:

quote:

Originally posted by Auto-Union:
Saabs are awesome. Can't compare to a Solara, lol...sorry.

lol... at a 60% higher MSRP it better be!

Back to the Si, can anyone list a car that can compare for the same price? If so, I'd love to know make/model. We might be in the market next year for second car and so far the Si looks to be the winner, assuming the 4 door Si is in the works for next year as rumoured. Would be the perfect mate for my CRV
wink.gif


and both cars for the price of one Saab convertible...
grin.gif


....and the Solara is 60% more than the Hundai. Why not get a nice Elantra...based on price, of course. If it has 5 wheels and takes you somewhere...it pretty much meets your criteria as long as it's cheap. Right?
 
My Scion tC may not be able to match some aspects of the Si, but I think it's every bit as good a value for the money.
I really love this car - it's not a high-end vehicle, but it's incredibly good for the price, lots of fun, and has many options that require you to spend more money on other cars.
I think the reliability will be excellent as well.

Scott
 
quote:

Originally posted by Auto-Union:
....and the Solara is 60% more than the Hundai. Why not get a nice Elantra...based on price, of course. If it has 5 wheels and takes you somewhere...it pretty much meets your criteria as long as it's cheap. Right?
lol, because the Hyundai is even less reliable then the Saab convertible... so I would have to say no thanks to both. Thanks for the suggestion though
smile.gif


As you can tell, it's all about short and long term reliability for me. I agree the saab convertible was an amazing driving machine, it generated lots of smiles and goosebumps. All that joy was negated when it had to sit in the garage for 5 months saving 8k for the new (used) engine lol.

I owned a 2001 Elantra, and it was a nightmare. Was at the dealer a couple dozen times in less then 3 years. Tranny, bearings, electrical, vibrations, trim falling off doors, etc, etc, etc. I have better things to do then waste hundreds of hours getting sub-par auto's fixed, regardless if it's under warranty or not. My time is not free, as Hyundai seemed to think it was.

Please note, I'm not saying all saabs are bad, however the saab convertible for a few years was a lemon, and that was enough to turn me off. I mean, 8k for a used engine? No support from GM, err.. I mean Saab.
smile.gif
My buddy lost thousands on that car.

I Owned a 2004 Si for over 2 years. Just traded it in for 06 CRV (second baby came along last month). Didn't see the dealer once, not one time. Not a single thing went wrong with that car. Same goes for my buddies 5 year old accord, another buddy's 3 year old CRV and my wifes 91 Civic hatchback that she owned for 8 years. But I guess they're just flukes, right? Better go trade all those trouble free hondas in for one saab convertible!
grin.gif


Moral of the story is if I have to see a dealer often, or try to scrimp and save 8k for a used saab engine while the car sits in the garage, I would rather stick with what works.. for me, that's Honda/Toyota. Maybe I'll change my mind after a couple bad experiences with Honda, but that has yet to happen to me, or any of my friends or family who own(ed) Hondas. There is one exception however, my father owned a 72 Civic Wagon. Tranny puked after a couple of years. Since I wasn't born when he bought it I can't possibly shame Honda for that.
rolleyes.gif
He loves my new CRV though and is now considering a Civic after 4 years with his Saturn.

[ July 11, 2006, 08:41 AM: Message edited by: webfors ]
 
quote:

Originally posted by ScottB:
My Scion tC may not be able to match some aspects of the Si, but I think it's every bit as good a value for the money.
I really love this car - it's not a high-end vehicle, but it's incredibly good for the price, lots of fun, and has many options that require you to spend more money on other cars.
I think the reliability will be excellent as well.

Scott


Hi Scott, wish we had the Scion brand here in Canada. Have yet to find a dealer. Scion is Toyota right? I'll have to check them out if they ever come north
smile.gif
 
If your buddy paid $8k for a used engine, he is just an idiot. Let's hear a lil more cause/effect on why the engine went "bad" to begin with. Does every Saab engine go bad, is that what you are saying, or are you saying that your "buddy" is partly to blame? Come on, do you really think Saab would still be a major mfg today if every one of their engines blew at 40k?
 
quote:

Originally posted by webfors:

quote:

Originally posted by ScottB:
My Scion tC may not be able to match some aspects of the Si, but I think it's every bit as good a value for the money.
I really love this car - it's not a high-end vehicle, but it's incredibly good for the price, lots of fun, and has many options that require you to spend more money on other cars.
I think the reliability will be excellent as well.

Scott


Hi Scott, wish we had the Scion brand here in Canada. Have yet to find a dealer. Scion is Toyota right? I'll have to check them out if they ever come north
smile.gif


Yes, sadly, they aren't up there (yet)
Too bad too - fantastic cars for the buck, and actually quite fun.
People think it looks a lot like the Infiniti G35, which it kinda does.
It mostly has Camry parts, so I know they're easy to get parts and reliable.
It's the first new car I've bought since my 1992 Ford Explorer - mortgage, kids in school, etc. etc.

Scott
 
lol, you must own a saab, be a saab enthusiast, work for saab, or have some strange fetish for saabs
smile.gif
Either way, let's continue:

Since it wasn't my car I can't give you a play by play of exactly what happened. I do know the following:

1. oil was changed religiously every 5k (km). Just in case you need conversion help, that's about every 3k miles.

2. New engine was $12k, used was $8k. Think Canadian dollars. I can assure you he's no idiot and searched long and hard for a replacement. Maybe not as long and hard as a bitog member would, but bitog members are a special breed
wink.gif


While you might be able to pay less in the USA, that was the best price he could find locally with a modest warranty (6 months). Remember, everything is more expensive in Canada.

3. Read my posts over again and you'll clearly see I was referring to the saab convertible only, since that is the only saab I have experience with, and also stated that I don't think all saabs are bad. I used to be impressed with Saabs, and actually recommended them to friends looking for a good used car in the past. I simply can't do that in good conscious anymore.

Regardless of whether this was a one off fluke (which it clearly is not if you search), it doesn't change the fact that if they do break, they cost too much to fix, unless you're a mechanic with links to a used Saab parts club (if that exists).

Oh, and I forgot to mention that his Wife drove the car. I know them both well, and I know how she drives. Her driving habits should have resulted in the engine lasting forever.

The information I got from him, was the the engine had metal shrapnel in it when the oil was drained. So something sheared off inside the engine, resulting in the circulation of this metal, thereby destroying the engine. This sounds exactly like the symptoms experienced by other owners of the same engine design.

This happened two years ago, and I wish I had taken pics, done an oil analysis, and/or talked to the mechanic myself. Would off been good to document this thoroughly, but it wasn't my car and that would of cost more money and time.

People can disregard my experience if they like, but the fact is that the whole thing ended up costing about $8k more then it should have, and then factor in the resale, which is horrible, and you have a money pit. Is a *used* saab a great deal? Sure, that's because of the low resale value. Resale value is resale value for a reason. It's not a magical number pulled out of thin air. Many factors make up how much a used car sells for, and for me the resale value is one of the most important factors when purchasing a car.

I'm sure every car manufacturer has had engine failures, it's not isolated to Saab. However, I wouldn't fault someone for not buying from the same company again if they went thru the same experience.

Will I personally buy a Saab? No. I think there are better cars out there for less money. Do they have all the gadgets and gizmos that a saab come with? No, but I don't need the "Enterprise" to drive from point A to point B. Just a good reliable car that drives well, gets good mileage, and doesn't waste my time with excessive visits to the dealer.

I'm sure Saabs are rated highly overall, but do a simple google search for the string 'saab convertible engine failure' and you'll find many similar experiences. It was a flawed engine design and Saab should have stepped up to the plate and recognized it. They didn't, so they don't get my business nor my recommendation anymore.

[ July 12, 2006, 08:15 AM: Message edited by: webfors ]
 
hmm... found the following:

http://www.saabservices.com/saab_engine_failure.html
http://www.saabservices.com/qaoilsludge.pdf

Pretty sure my buddy exhausted all avenues, but if Saab is saying that they'll cover it, it would be interesting to know why they refused him initially. Maybe it was before they officially acknowledged the problem, since that document was dated 2005, or maybe it doesn't include us poor Canadians
smile.gif


I'll have him contact Saab Canada again, however due to the time that has passed I'd be quite surprised if he received any satisfaction from them.

As you can see, it's not an isolated incident, and affects almost 4000 Saabs in Sweden alone.
 
no, in reality the ridiculous scenario is that a Honda with 30k and 3 years old will sell for @205k less than a brand new one.

Intelligence in buying that car???? I cant see any.

My saab 9-3 hasnt had any issues, has a top notch drivetrain, gets me in excess of 34 MPG most every tank, and has (non-xeon) headlights that are the best Ive ever used... on top of a LOT of other great aspects of the car with respect to safety, technology, etc.

Ive priced out PM and similar parts fr my 9-3 and have found them to be on par with my other european cars and our Japanese cars that we own... no gimmick there.

I guess you'd call my 83 MB 300D a gimmick too. LOL, find a better, longer lasting car - your honda will be to the scrap twice over before the 300D starts to show signs of wearing out.

JMH
 
quote:

Originally posted by webfors:
hmm... found the following:

http://www.saabservices.com/saab_engine_failure.html
http://www.saabservices.com/qaoilsludge.pdf

Pretty sure my buddy exhausted all avenues, but if Saab is saying that they'll cover it, it would be interesting to know why they refused him initially. Maybe it was before they officially acknowledged the problem, since that document was dated 2005, or maybe it doesn't include us poor Canadians
smile.gif


I'll have him contact Saab Canada again, however due to the time that has passed I'd be quite surprised if he received any satisfaction from them.

As you can see, it's not an isolated incident, and affects almost 4000 Saabs in Sweden alone.


And similar things dont happen with Toyota engines??? You're very shortsighted if you think that it is a saab only or a 'gimmick car' only issue...

JMH
 
Similar discussion is/was going on at the Miata forum wondering why a Miata "only" gets 25-30 MPG.

In the Miata's case, it is a 4.10-4.30 final drive/.8 overdrive and an engine tuned for response and power, vs fuel economy. I would think the same holds true of the Civic Si.

I personally find that the city EPA numbers are fairly easy to hit with a small engine, even while having some degree of fun, but that it's hard to hit them with a big engine, unless you drive it like a granny.

I personally consider the 2006 Civic SI to be quite an achievement, enough that I am considering selling both my 2000 Miata and my '96 Impala SS to consolidate down to one reliable, practical, great handling car. I never thought I'd say that about ANY FWD car, but Honda has really done a great job with this car. I can only imagine how sweet they could have made it with RWD.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom