I've seen comments here talking about how much worse HFCS is that (usually) cane sugar in carbonated beverages. But there's just this fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of sucrose, which is actually just one fructose and one glucose molecule bonded to each other. There's a term for sucrose that's disassociated, which is "invert sugar" or "inverted sugar", which is done so through a chemical process.
Now HFCS is slightly biased towards more fructose - typically about 55% of the sugar. So theoretically it should be slightly sweeter 1:1 compared to invert sugar.
But the irony in all the claims about "cane sugar" in sodas ignore how carbonated soft drinks are made. They're usually heated in order to properly make the syrup. Most sodas have citric and/or phosphoric acid, and that disassociates sucrose in the presence of heat. Apparently this is called "acid catalyzed sucrose hydrolysis" and has been known about for over a century. I believe it will also happen slowly at room temperature if there's a cold dissolve process for the sucrose.
Now HFCS is slightly biased towards more fructose - typically about 55% of the sugar. So theoretically it should be slightly sweeter 1:1 compared to invert sugar.
But the irony in all the claims about "cane sugar" in sodas ignore how carbonated soft drinks are made. They're usually heated in order to properly make the syrup. Most sodas have citric and/or phosphoric acid, and that disassociates sucrose in the presence of heat. Apparently this is called "acid catalyzed sucrose hydrolysis" and has been known about for over a century. I believe it will also happen slowly at room temperature if there's a cold dissolve process for the sucrose.