BISCUT
Thread starter
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2011
- Messages
- 5,443
I'm having a hard time understanding the whole "Synthetic Blend" craze? I can understand people not wanting synthetic in certain applications. And others not wanting dino based oils any longer. I myself am in that group. Personally, I think the full synthetic oils are noticeably better performing. From both a lubrication and longevity standpoint. And well worth their additional cost.
But I'm not getting this whole "blend" thing? To me it's a bit like blending half Nutrasweet, and half sugar in a cola. You get the benefit of neither. And the bad side of both.
And if it's cost, it's false economics. Look at the overall operating costs of a modern vehicle today. Purchase price, depreciation, insurance, licensing, fuel, maintenance, and repair. And the measly few bucks you're going to save on utilizing a "synthetic blend" motor oil, are all but microscopic to non existent.
No craze here for me. This was pure pricepoint for my kids incoming car. I used Motorcraft 5-30 blend when I had the 2004 F150 and it performed well. If not the price for this oil, I would have gone ST synthetic 5-30 and never looked back.