Have you tried friction modifiers in your engine oil?

Not for me. I’d tend to sick to a standardized laboratory test such as ASTM D8114 where you have controls. It’s not a particularly difficult nor expensive test but it’s funny how all the “snake oil” additive companies never seem to publish a result. It would eliminate all this flapping around about “real world” driving.
 
Not for me. I’d tend to sick to a standardized laboratory test such as ASTM D8114 where you have controls. It’s not a particularly difficult nor expensive test but it’s funny how all the “snake oil” additive companies never seem to publish a result. It would eliminate all this flapping around about “real world” driving.
Yeah, that's so bizarre. I actually ordered the Chlorine test kits, will test the NMF snake oil for chlorine once DEXSIL Clor-D-Tect Q4000 test kits arrive:


I messaged them multiple times, they say there is no harmful substance but refuse to say no chlorine, just like EMT says:
Told them why not? If you don't use chlorine it's not like that harms you, it actually makes the snake oil look better. Like Archoil, they clearly say what's in it (BN), weather it's beneficial or not, will be on the informed customer to find out.
 
I used Ceratec in my motor once and saw an improvement. But unless you do extended drain intervals say, 10k or so it's pretty costly to use every change. I think they recommend every other change or something lie that. I use it in my manual transmission and it shifts smoother.
 
OK, it's even easier than that. Fill the tank, Take 1 50 mile loop, add the snake oil and then take 50 mile look again. Same road, same gas, same night, same driver, same speed, same tier, same weather. Also, reset the averaging once you are on the highway and read before you leave, that eliminates any city driving effect. End of discussion?
Doesn’t work that simply. The basic rules of statistical analysis require at least 30 data points for each sample to be able to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the test platforms. It requires all variables in each test to be the same; that’s what kschachn was inferring. You may have seen 25 and 26.4mpg, but if the standard deviation was +/- 1.5 mpg, you’ve gained nothing.

Air temp, wind direction and speed, atmospheric pressure, road condition… the uncontrollable variables will always induce more noise into your measurements than any actual mileage improvements ever would… proving that you can never attribute the improvement (or detriment) to a single variable when you’re attempting to test in the manner you reference. 👍🏻
 
Oil additive manf. and formulator's spend a lot of times testing their formulations, something OTC and Third Party Oil Additives companies do not do.

I wish I had checked with a sound level meter to see if it's placebo but the HR-V's engine was so quiet with valvoline's blue restore that I sometimes wondered if it was actually running when idling in a parking lot. Another example is when flooring it on the highway, the high revs were muffled. To the cars next to me, it would sound as if the HR-V was barely trying to accelerate.

My hypothesis is it has friction modifiers we don't see in PCMO.
 
Doesn’t work that simply. The basic rules of statistical analysis require at least 30 data points for each sample to be able to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the test platforms. It requires all variables in each test to be the same; that’s what kschachn was inferring. You may have seen 25 and 26.4mpg, but if the standard deviation was +/- 1.5 mpg, you’ve gained nothing.

Air temp, wind direction and speed, atmospheric pressure, road condition… the uncontrollable variables will always induce more noise into your measurements than any actual mileage improvements ever would… proving that you can never attribute the improvement (or detriment) to a single variable when you’re attempting to test in the manner you reference. 👍🏻
Also, in this instance, the economy meter in the car is being relied on, which are notoriously inaccurate.
 
The engineers with Honda, GM and Toyota just can't seem to find a way to measure fuel consumption over distance. This is a problem that has perplexed everyone since the dawn of creation!
 
The engineers with Honda, GM and Toyota just can't seem to find a way to measure fuel consumption over distance. This is a problem that has perplexed everyone since the dawn of creation!
It's because there isn't much compensation for environmental differences. Air mass is far more controlled.

Which again shows the difficulty of "real-world" measurements. The one time I saw this done they used some sort of volumetric device such as a large burette which had to have compensation for temperature. These days I'm sure there are more accurate devices that use some other method of determination.
 
What specific additive are you referring to?

Was referring to the friction modifiers in valvoline's blue restore.

Engine oil doesn't normally muffle engine sounds so unless it's my imagination, there's something different compared to PCMOs.

Found this just now when trying to research:
"Friction modifiers and other additives are included at much higher treat rates in HDDEOs compared to passenger car engine oils. The additive content can be almost double that of passenger cars and dispersants and detergents perform a greater role. Whilst friction modifiers have not been an area of focus for HDDEO until recently, they now play an important part in low viscosity oils to reduce wear and friction."
source
 
I've used BG MOA and 44K in my recent oil change after the BG EPR flush. The car does feel more punchier on the acceleration and MPG seems to have a slight increase, highest I recorded was 46 mpg which is impressive, however traffic conditions at the time was very ideal, which was nonstop highway driving without slowing down. Hard to say if the MOA have a meaningful impact since multiple BG products was used all at once.
 
Came across this when researching friction modifiers in engine oil yesterday. It's about industrial equipment but I thought they did a good job of explaining:

Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 5.59.13 AM.jpg




Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 5.54.24 AM.png


Source
 
Found the mother of all snake oils:
It's a legit german company selling exactly these stuff
 
Ionic liquids aren't new. The germans used it in their oils during WW2 (voltol) and it appears it was effective. But the ionic oils are not very liquid at low temperatures which limits the concentration you can use.

E-ion is another supplier
 
I finished the chlorine test.
Result: I detected 18000 ppm chlorine in my engine oil (amsoil 0w20 ss) which had hss stiction and moglide (NMF) friction reducer in it. Sine the test kit was 4000ppm max I deluted the drained sample 1 to 9 with fresh oil to get to 10%.

Process: after 1800 miles I added moglied (NMF) to the engine oil (amsoil ss 0w20) which already had hss stiction. After a couple hundred miles drained the oil and saved a sample bottle of it. For testing got a 4000ppm chlorine test kit, so, diluted the sample drained oil 1 to 9 with fresh oil to get to 10% used oil in 90% fresh oil. DEXSIL Clor-D-Tect Q4000 shows 1800 ppm chlorine and since the sample is diluted to 10% should be about 18,000 ppm in the original drained oil sample.

disclaimer: I am not making any claim about any of the mentioned products or if the test is done in a 100% scientific way. This is just a personal observation.
 

Attachments

  • photo_2023-11-05_11-27-27.jpg
    photo_2023-11-05_11-27-27.jpg
    83.5 KB · Views: 4
  • photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28 (2).jpg
    photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28 (2).jpg
    100.3 KB · Views: 5
  • photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28 (3).jpg
    photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28 (3).jpg
    94.2 KB · Views: 5
  • photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28 (4).jpg
    photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28 (4).jpg
    65.5 KB · Views: 5
  • photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28.jpg
    photo_2023-11-05_11-27-28.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 5
  • photo_2023-11-05_11-28-29.jpg
    photo_2023-11-05_11-28-29.jpg
    173.3 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
Back
Top