One thing that really irks me about the test is the fact that I only see a quick comment on filtration quality... I'm not told how it was decided which filters do in fact have better filtration... Just a rather vague comment on each one. "Better than average, below average.. good.. excellent.." etc. It tells me something, but not a whole lot.
And even more importantly, as it was kind-of touched on by someone else, how well would the filters hold up over time? How well would it filter after 3,000, 5,000, 10,000 miles? Of course that's asking quite a lot from a home-study like this. The effort put forth so far is appreciated, for certain.
But inquiring minds want more.
Being an armchair critic is rather easy... and I'll try to be as considerate and constructive as possible. Any and all efforts put forth so far I am very grateful for. I'm just trying to make sense of things and do my best to not step on anyone's toes
[ June 13, 2004, 08:51 PM: Message edited by: Matt-TDI ]
And even more importantly, as it was kind-of touched on by someone else, how well would the filters hold up over time? How well would it filter after 3,000, 5,000, 10,000 miles? Of course that's asking quite a lot from a home-study like this. The effort put forth so far is appreciated, for certain.
But inquiring minds want more.
Being an armchair critic is rather easy... and I'll try to be as considerate and constructive as possible. Any and all efforts put forth so far I am very grateful for. I'm just trying to make sense of things and do my best to not step on anyone's toes

[ June 13, 2004, 08:51 PM: Message edited by: Matt-TDI ]