Originally Posted By: sayjac
As I put it, it's a gimmick
"imo". I think along the lines of what Mark S said in
previously linked thread here "I think I would prefer to select my oil for engine protection and my filter to "filter"". River_rat added a further comment saying
"I think a blob of unknown gell on the clean side of the filter is asking for trouble--especially considering the maker."
The 'especially considering the maker' is an important point imo. This is the same company that marketed/sold the Double Guard filter using PTFE, it seems fairly clear now that Teflon has no place in, nor was it designed for use an engine. Speaks for itself. And unlike most additives that the user knows at least some perhap most of the contents, as the thread topic suggests, the gel composition is unknown.
I'll choose a quality oil, and quality filter for a reasonable oci for that combination. Then, if I choose to use an oil additive it would be based on research and information posted here on Bitog not what Fram chooses. However, I don't regularly use an oil additive, more belief in the first part of this thought.
That said, if others choose to the HM with it's unknown additive fine. I just don't believe in the concept or the price, thus the gimmick.
So you don't know what the additive is and yet you can draw a conclusion. Superb stuff there.
You haven't seen the testing results. Have no clue how it works. Don't know who helped develop the additive. And there are enough chemical or oil companies worldwide who sell engine oil treatment products from which Fram could utilize.
My car just turned 69,000 miles. Only ever change the Mobil 1 oil every 6-7,000 miles. Never use aftermarket oil additive products. But i am sure not going to take shots at those who do.