Um, there were extra boxes if you felt you deserved more geek points. If you felt there weren't enough of those boxes, that should be worth a point. And if you
still complained that certain specific questions were not asked, that should have been worth at least a couple points.
Speaking of which, these should have been boxes/choices:
- Changing your own oil religiously.
- Track car maintenance on a computer.
- Track lawnmower maintenance on a computer.
- Being a BITOG member.
- Know what UOA stands for?
- Sent in a UOA?
- Discussed your UOA on a website?
- Sent in more than 5 UOAs in 2 years?
- Paid for someone else's UOA?
Me? I'm a "Total Geek" at a paltry 18.14596% and I probably could have checked off another few boxes depending, depending ...
But really, they should have done the rankings better. There should have been a better threshold for true geekdom ... and the labels could be better. No "Nano Geek?" "Mega Geek?" "Giga Geek?"
Oops, that criticism of the rankings should be worth at least another point!
---
Bror Jace
[ August 04, 2004, 02:13 PM: Message edited by: Bror Jace ]