GC 0W-30 11300mi Toyota Land Cruiser 99 4.7l vs. Amsoil

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
Messages
21
Location
Chicago, Il
I have just completed a 11,300 mi run on GC and thought it would be interesting to post as I have run a couple of Amsoil 5W-30 analysis. Columns are GC 0W-30 / Amsoil 5W-30 Run#2/ Amsoil 5W-30 Run #1

Mi on Oil 11,300 / 11,500 / 12,000
Mi on unit 104343 / 93,060 / 77,000

Al 2 / 2 / 3
Cr 1 / 1 / 0
Iron 12 / 12 / 14
Copper 3 / 7 / 12
lead 1 / 1 / 2
Tin 2 / 0 / 2
Moly 1 / 3 / 4
Boron 4 / 21 / 22
Silicon 14 / 15 / 26
Sodium 4 / 5 / 5
Calcium 2486 / 2130 / 2075
Magnesium 182 / 700 / 672
Phosphorus 672 / 832 / 835
Zinc 873 / 1057 / 1010
TBN 2.6 / 2.8 / 2.6
Visc. SUS@210F 69.0 / 72.3
Insol 0.4 / 0.4

Used a Purolator Pure One Filter for all tests with a filter change at ~5500 mi. The GC was the only oil that I added 1 qt. of makeup oil. Amsoil never was down except for the makeup for the filter change. I tow a 5000lb trailer approx 1200 miles on this oil run. I also towed a slightly lighter trailer with the Amsoil over the summer. The mileage occured over 3.5 months and was probably >90% highway. In my opinion, GC is as good as Amsoil for this application. The next oil I am looking at is M-1 EP. As both of these oils made it to 11K easily, I may take a sample of the M-1 at 11K then run it to 15K. I think all of these oils can make it to 15K in my vehicle. It sure is nice not having to change oil every 6 weeks.
 
Nice results. Both of these oils are very good and very capable. Look forward to the M1 results, which I would think look similar. These Toyota engines are just so consistant.
 
Nice information. Almost zero difference in the results. GC=No MOly, No Boron
dunno.gif
dunno.gif
 
I'm changing the oil this weekend on my Sequioa, same engine... M1 10W30, about 9K on oil, 62K on unit... I expect the results to be as solid as yours. I usually utilize a 7.5K interval, but I misread my maintainance log and left the oil in longer by accident.
 
Allow me to nit pick ...
wink.gif


Since you added an extra one quart on the GC run, the numbers and oil degradation aren't directly comparable. In particular, you'd get a TBN boost of 1-2 points by adding the quart of fresh oil and the concentration of insolubles will be decreased a bit.

Having said that, the GC 0w-30 provides excellent valve train protection once again, giving credience to my crazy theory about the ASTM D-4172 test.

I can almost hear my pal Doug Hillary saying "B---er!,B---er!, B---er! when he reads this and slamming his hand on the table ...
wink.gif


Tooslick
 
quote:

In my opinion, GC is as good as Amsoil for this application.

I second that .....how can you make that statement when the GC had the benefit of make up oil where the Amsoil run did not? It also begs the question: Why did one quart of the GC burn off? In the Amsoil run there was no oil consumption.
 
I think that is easily answered by the fact that the GC was in when some hard towing was involved. The GC-s interval was more demanding and that towing could cause more consumption.
 
Some clarification here. The amsoil had a 1/2 qt makeup with a filter change at 5500 mi while the GC also had 1/2 qt make up with the 5500 mi filter change, but also needed an extra 1/2 qt. in the second half of the 5500 mi filter run. So 1 qt total was added in the 5500 - 11000 mi run. I towed just as hard with the Amsoil and never had to add oil. Regarding the additional 1/2 qt. helping the TBN of the GC. Keep in mind that this engine has a 7 qt. sump. I don't think it helped that much to say it made a big difference in TBN. That's only 7% extra additive from the extra 1/2 qt. I still think that there really is no difference between these oils in this application. I am not saying that GC is bad, I am saying that these are both good oils. My personal opinion is to keep the $$$ in the US and buy an American product instead of supporting a foreign made oil.

I also want to note that the GC did not seem to flow any better than Amsoil or M1 5W-30 during cold start ups. It surprised me to hear my engine groan during start up at temperatures below 20F. I would have thought a 0W-30 would flow a lot better. Has anyone tested viscosity of these oils at 0 degrees F??
 
quote:

Originally posted by BigDz:
Some clarification here. The amsoil had a 1/2 qt makeup with a filter change at 5500 mi while the GC also had 1/2 qt make up with the 5500 mi filter change, but also needed an extra 1/2 qt. in the second half of the 5500 mi filter run. So 1 qt total was added in the 5500 - 11000 mi run. I towed just as hard with the Amsoil and never had to add oil. Regarding the additional 1/2 qt. helping the TBN of the GC. Keep in mind that this engine has a 7 qt. sump. I don't think it helped that much to say it made a big difference in TBN. That's only 7% extra additive from the extra 1/2 qt. I still think that there really is no difference between these oils in this application. I am not saying that GC is bad, I am saying that these are both good oils. My personal opinion is to keep the $$$ in the US and buy an American product instead of supporting a foreign made oil.

I also want to note that the GC did not seem to flow any better than Amsoil or M1 5W-30 during cold start ups. It surprised me to hear my engine groan during start up at temperatures below 20F. I would have thought a 0W-30 would flow a lot better. Has anyone tested viscosity of these oils at 0 degrees F??


the oil is pumped it does not flow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom