This is just a random general question I've had for a while.
My car and my wife's are both FWD with independent rear suspension. Mine (a Honda Civic) has the rear control arms bolted to a subframe piece that's welded to the unibody in the middle of the car, while the wife's (Mazda3) has a separate subframe assembly that's bolted to the unibody, more like how the front subframes/engine cradles are attached on both cars.
What are the reasons for choosing one method of manufacture over the other? It seems to me like a bolt-on subframe would be easier to tweak from model to model and would be cheaper to manufacture as well. Unless I'm wrong and a welded one is cheaper, why would a manufacturer go with a welded subframe?
I can probably get some pictures if need be but I don't have any right now...
My car and my wife's are both FWD with independent rear suspension. Mine (a Honda Civic) has the rear control arms bolted to a subframe piece that's welded to the unibody in the middle of the car, while the wife's (Mazda3) has a separate subframe assembly that's bolted to the unibody, more like how the front subframes/engine cradles are attached on both cars.
What are the reasons for choosing one method of manufacture over the other? It seems to me like a bolt-on subframe would be easier to tweak from model to model and would be cheaper to manufacture as well. Unless I'm wrong and a welded one is cheaper, why would a manufacturer go with a welded subframe?
I can probably get some pictures if need be but I don't have any right now...