Five Most Macho Cars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: gofast182
I love Hemi Cudas but there's no stock example running times like that. Modified to modified there are Toyota Supras out there which would spank 8.70.


Correct, BUT, there are no mid size, Nippon, Camrys (even with boosted/modded GTEs from said Pupras transplanted into them) running those times either.
wink.gif
lol.gif
 
i was at tulsa in 1968 when the HEMI CUDA was new. i talked to Ronnie SOX standing next to the new HEMI CUDA. off the trailer it did 10.8 s.. the HEMI cudas running now ARE stock by NHRA rules, just like it was in 1968. i might be old but my memory isnt that bad. do i need to drag out the pics? so bring ANY THING that meets NHRA stock rules an run it against ANY HEMI CUDA. you will go home very quickly. if you wasnt there IT DIDNT HAPPEN.
 
Originally Posted By: morris
i was at tulsa in 1968 when the HEMI CUDA was new. i talked to Ronnie SOX standing next to the new HEMI CUDA. off the trailer it did 10.8 s.. the HEMI cudas running now ARE stock by NHRA rules, just like it was in 1968. i might be old but my memory isnt that bad. do i need to drag out the pics? so bring ANY THING that meets NHRA stock rules an run it against ANY HEMI CUDA. you will go home very quickly. if you wasnt there IT DIDNT HAPPEN.


NHRA stock rules (IE "stock car") doesn't make it stock bud
wink.gif


You and I have been over this before. The TASCA Super BOSS was a 10-second stock car too.... on polyglass tires. That doesn't mean that modified versions of the BOSS 429 that still fall within the NHRA definition of a "stock" motor are stock in terms of what is being discussed in this thread.
 
Most macho cars?

Ferrari F40
Lamborghini Countach
Porsche 959
BMW 850CSi
McLaren F1


No old domestic iron need apply.


Edit: And the single most macho racing car ever built is the Porsche 917/30; no room for discussion or debate.
 
Originally Posted By: gofast182
Originally Posted By: morris
" Japanese V6 midsize " my bet is THE HEMI CUDA will rip up, the ricer. can the ricer do 8.70 the 1/4? i bet NOT.

Stock to stock? I love Hemi Cudas but there's no stock example running times like that. Modified to modified there are Toyota Supras out there which would spank 8.70. But would I consider said Toyota macho? No, not really.


A blueprinted engine and suspension and tire set-up for B/Stock drag racing Boss 429 Mustang ran just about what the Boss 5.0 runs off the showroom floor now.

But we remember the Boss 302 and DZ302 Z/28 for being monsters. The published 1/4 mi times for those cars are actually not quite as good as the current Camry V6. Or Accord V6 for that matter. If you found a set of bias belted Polyglas or Wide Oval tires tires for your 1969 Boss 302 or Z/28, leave the Camry V6 alone.
wink.gif
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: morris
i was at tulsa in 1968 when the HEMI CUDA was new. i talked to Ronnie SOX standing next to the new HEMI CUDA. off the trailer it did 10.8 s.. the HEMI cudas running now ARE stock by NHRA rules, just like it was in 1968. i might be old but my memory isnt that bad. do i need to drag out the pics? so bring ANY THING that meets NHRA stock rules an run it against ANY HEMI CUDA. you will go home very quickly. if you wasnt there IT DIDNT HAPPEN.


NHRA stock rules (IE "stock car") doesn't make it stock bud
wink.gif


You and I have been over this before. The TASCA Super BOSS was a 10-second stock car too.... on polyglass tires. That doesn't mean that modified versions of the BOSS 429 that still fall within the NHRA definition of a "stock" motor are stock in terms of what is being discussed in this thread.


You gotta give morris one thing: That Hemi Cuda in that video was a DOG. It simply wasn't running well. Also the Buick had long tube headers visible in several different shots. There's more, I ain't takin' notes...

The one thing that wasn't mentioned was the variance in motors back then. You could find huge differences from car to car, a half a second in the 1/4 mile was common among big engine cars.
 
1949,1950 Mercury

After all said and done and done correctly.... Just showed my "O" face.

Like this one :

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.chooseyouritem.com/classics/photos/1318000/1318269.1949.Mercury.2-Door.Coupe.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.chooseyouritem.com/classics/files/1318000/1318269.html&h=318&w=424&sz=26&tbnid=kUb2_iB2GKZeaM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=120&zoom=1&usg=__mZgaDF0K8BJPjYtfXEJxvfdPGhY=&docid=YWZXUnZ9CmlLIM&sa=X&ei=eoeoUbrmLoz88QSE9oCYAQ&ved=0CDAQ9QEwAQ&dur=1854
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: cat843
I would replace the "Cuda" with a 1969 Mach 1 Mustang with 351 Windsor engine.

70 mustang sportroof, air, comp suspension, tractionlok, and 35ic 4v engine. I had one I want it back!
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: morris
see there you dont even know the right term. its Super Stock!!! when you race and BET the HEMI CUDA come back.


LOL! This always gets you so wound-up
wink.gif
Yes, Super Stock isn't "Stock", we've covered this a million times now!! HAHHA
 
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8


You gotta give morris one thing: That Hemi Cuda in that video was a DOG. It simply wasn't running well. Also the Buick had long tube headers visible in several different shots. There's more, I ain't takin' notes...

The one thing that wasn't mentioned was the variance in motors back then. You could find huge differences from car to car, a half a second in the 1/4 mile was common among big engine cars.


for sure Steve! So was the Chevelle.
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8


You gotta give morris one thing: That Hemi Cuda in that video was a DOG. It simply wasn't running well. Also the Buick had long tube headers visible in several different shots. There's more, I ain't takin' notes...

The one thing that wasn't mentioned was the variance in motors back then. You could find huge differences from car to car, a half a second in the 1/4 mile was common among big engine cars.


for sure Steve! So was the Chevelle.
smile.gif



Agreed. I wasn't even going to go there since I had one...
 
The most macho car is the one driven by the guy who didn't check to see what cars other people considered macho.
 
Originally Posted By: Mykl
The most macho car is the one driven by the guy who didn't check to see what cars other people considered macho.


THIS^^^ is kind of my philosophy on being what many/most in this here land (and possibly the rest of the globe) call "a real man".

As far as I'm concerned one is NOT a "real man" if he must take heed, and obey the 'rules' that others set about being said "real man".
wink.gif
 
Mustache is required to drive it...

Or the old race car drivers that used to hang the backs out of skinny tired open wheeled cars at 150mph while smoking a cigar and maybe wearing a leather helmet. Like Enzo, Moss or Fangio. Those guys had brass balls.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: Trav
Originally Posted By: dparm
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Wonder how many of those cars would get whipped by a Japanese V6 midsize these days...


Probably most of them, especially in the handling segment. But that's not why you buy them.




I remember that show well. The BOSS 429, which many didn't think would win, cleaned house.
wink.gif


One of my favourite cars of all time.


I just watched that video. That chevelle is almost the same as my uncles 70,his has the 4 speed and bigger gear. Its a rocket for its size and in all honesty I'd have to spray my mustang to beat him.
A 4v Mach can do 13.1 stock,on street tires. On sticky tires it can get into the 12s with a driver who knows the car(like me). That chevelle with meats and a stick could see those numbers,again with a driver who knows the car.
What impresses me about today's cars is that some sixxers can get into these numbers too,without boost.
Muscle cars are just that,however you don't just need muscle to go fast.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom