FAQ on differences between Group III and Group IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 25, 2005
Messages
334
Location
NorCal
I swear there used to be a FAQ on the differences between Group III and Group IV oils. I've been searching for the last 15 mins... can anyone please link me to it? Really appreciate it...

Sorry about the noob post
confused.gif
blush.gif
 
So what this says is they've come to a refining process with group 3 base oils that meets ,or is better, than PAO base stock oil's in some cases.So if they mix up the bases,group 3 and PAO's,you get a BETTER product than the old stuff, thats cheaper for the oil companies to produce,but the price stays the same....got-it
 
Quote:


So what this says is they've come to a refining process with group 3 base oils that meets ,or is better, than PAO base stock oil's in some cases. So if they mix up the bases,group 3 and PAO's,you get a BETTER product than the old stuff, thats cheaper for the oil companies to produce,but the price stays the same....got-it




Be careful there. He doesn't state the other case. Group IIIs have a pretty loose definition and thus one can use predominantly, or all, of an inferior Group III basestock and end up with stuff that is far inferior to a predominantly PAO formulation, and still call it a full synthetic.
 
so can someone dumb it down for me and just give me a couple reasons why a group IV is usually considered better than a group III?
 
Quote:


so can someone dumb it down for me and just give me a couple reasons why a group IV is usually considered better than a group III?




Let me try this rough analogy to water and see if some don't squeal too loudly.

Group IV is like taking pure hydrogen and pure oxygen and combining them to create water.

Group III is like taking water out of the lake and processing it so that it is suitable to be delivered to your home as drinkable water.

hide.gif
 
Quote:




Let me try this rough analogy to water and see if some don't squeal too loudly.

Group IV is like taking pure hydrogen and pure oxygen and combining them to create water.

Group III is like taking water out of the lake and processing it so that it is suitable to be delivered to your home as drinkable water.

hide.gif





I guess the big question then is how much of a snob is your engine about its "water". I know that some people here say that their engine only likes the bottled import stuff from the German Alps (okay I am not certain that it is really made in the Alps, but I needed an Evian analogy).
 
That's a good one 427Z06. This purity enhances some attributes of the basestock (fewer deposits and volitility as temps raise, and better flow as temps drop - VI vs. III), while lessening others (additive soluability). There's more but that's all this hobby going individual recalls. :')
 
Aquafina is just purified detroit tap water....so I guess that means it's group 3 (the end of synthetic as we know it
wink.gif
)
 
Quote:


Aquafina is just purified detroit tap water....so I guess that means it's group 3 (the end of synthetic as we know it
wink.gif
)



Good one so true though.
For all you experts out there what is the future of group IV oils??
ufo.gif
 
You can make a #@$%! Group IV or III but what he did say is with modern additive you can make LOTS of Group III with properties matching very closely to the Group IV stuff everyone loved. Heck even beat it some regards.

So what we are to learn is Group III should be cheaper like Pennzoil so do not overpay for Mobil1.

Looks like Group IV except for boutique blends is DONE, FINISHED, OVER!
 
And this:

Quote:


"... a 1999 ruling by the National Advertising Division of the Better Business Bureaus broadened the definition of synthetic lubricants to include Group III base stocks. With Group III granted the right to wear the Œsynthetic label - and a cost differential of $1.50 to $2.00 a gallon in favor of Group III most large lubricant producers moved quickly to replace PAO with Group III in their synthetic PCMO formulations."




Is this what Exxon-Mobil battled against?
 
Thanks for that article. 427. In the end, it looks like GTL could be the ultimate winner. That is years away though. It seems that their is very little difference between high quality Group III+ and PAO's. I'm not happy with Mobil's decision, but I still think it's a good product.
 
Quote:


Thanks for that article. 427. In the end, it looks like GTL could be the ultimate winner. That is years away though. It seems that their is very little difference between high quality Group III+ and PAO's. I'm not happy with Mobil's decision, but I still think it's a good product.




"Seems" and "years away" being the operative words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom