Originally Posted by billt460
Originally Posted by Jarlaxle
Your question is based on a false premise, and therefore meaningless.
So now you admit it is a question after all. One you are incapable of answering because at first you didn't see it. Then when it is pointed out to you a second time, you don't like it, or the obvious answer. So instead you attempt to run interference with complete B.S. Aside from your total lack of comprehension, (or else bad vision), why did I already know that?
OK, now from remedial grammar, to remedial logic, to remedial reading comprehension...I should start charging for these lessons.
Your initial statement was:
Quote
Tattoos, especially facial tattoos, immediately provoke a negative reaction from most any person who sees them. And that reaction usually is, "Oh My God!".... Or thoughts to that effect. Now the only question that needs to be asked, is what type of personality wants, or feels the need to provoke that kind of reaction from nearly everyone who first lays eyes on them? Who out there, young or old, actually thinks disfigurement is "in"?
The statement (not question) your entire post rested on was,
Quote
Tattoos, especially facial tattoos, immediately provoke a negative reaction from most any person who sees them. And that reaction usually is, "Oh My God!".... Or thoughts to that effect.
That is, quite simply, unsupported speculation. It is a wild leap of what I hesitate to call logic, because it shows none. It is, again and still, not a question.
Quote
Now the only question that needs to be asked, is what type of personality wants, or feels the need to provoke that kind of reaction from nearly everyone who first lays eyes on them? Who out there, young or old, actually thinks disfigurement is "in"?
This question is based, again, on a false premise, and therefore meaningless.
And as usual, everything wears the garnish of ad hominem personal attacks.