Originally Posted By: moribundman
Originally Posted By: ekpolk
This isn't "lawyer full employment" stuff, it's designed to keep large corporate entities from trying to steamroll individual owners
Bwahahahahaha! Did you keep a straight face when posting that?
I did. Are you so naive as to believe that you can litigate on even terms with GM, Ford, Toyota, or whoever? Do you have enough cash in your cookie jar to buy or rent a substitute car while the maker of your car draws your wty lawsuit out over four or five years? The only way to stop a large corporation from doing so, is to make them pay for doing so in cases where they should just pay up front. I've done what I do for fifteen years. In virtually every instance of a "David and Goliath" situation, without an atty fee provision, the standard litigation tactic for "Goliath" is to drag it out so that it's just too expensive for "David" to persist. So, which large corporation owns you?
Originally Posted By: ekpolk
This isn't "lawyer full employment" stuff, it's designed to keep large corporate entities from trying to steamroll individual owners
Bwahahahahaha! Did you keep a straight face when posting that?
I did. Are you so naive as to believe that you can litigate on even terms with GM, Ford, Toyota, or whoever? Do you have enough cash in your cookie jar to buy or rent a substitute car while the maker of your car draws your wty lawsuit out over four or five years? The only way to stop a large corporation from doing so, is to make them pay for doing so in cases where they should just pay up front. I've done what I do for fifteen years. In virtually every instance of a "David and Goliath" situation, without an atty fee provision, the standard litigation tactic for "Goliath" is to drag it out so that it's just too expensive for "David" to persist. So, which large corporation owns you?