Drove a new Jetta the other day....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
2,809
Location
Detroit, MI
I had the chance to drive a new Jetta a couple of days ago. This was a 2.0 model. I Went for about a 30 mile drive and here are my non-expert observations. All I have to my credentials are 17 years of having a license lol

First thing I noticed was the bland styling. Doesn't really appeal to me. I liked the look of the 4th gen Jetta, but I've never been in love with any of them.

Driving. First thing I noticed, and this may sound a little bit strange, is the driving position. It almost seems like the engineers measured once, and cut once with the setup. It just feels strange to drive. It almost feels like the steering wheel is too far in the center of the car. For instance, my right knee is smashed against the center console, and I have to reach with my left arm for the arm rest. The steering wheel and seating is too centered in the vehicle? I may be crazy, but it just felt like that to me as soon as I pulled out on the street.

Power was ok, nothing fun about driving it, but it seemed like it would get around from day to day as a commuter. On the HWY, you can def feel tell that it uses a solid beam rear suspension in favor of an independent setup. I think that was a bad decision. I know it prob keeps costs down, but even our Kia Spectra has independent rear suspension. The ride is pretty decent for the car, but the back end doesn't feel confident over bumps, and it has that strange bouncy feeling when moving up and stopping. For instance waiting in line for a right turn. Corning is pretty so-so, but overall driving of the car seems just ok as long as you are trying not to compare it to a more expensive vehicle.

Interior trim and fit & finish seems ok. The seats are are thin and small (I think this is a standard for many "European" style cars, but they did provide good support and were comfortable for me.

I HATE the accelerator pedal. It does not provide a positive feed back or resistance when using it. Also, it seems like at at some point the resistance gets high, and you have to push hard for the next step. Almost like a switch. After you push past that switch the RPM's will climb higher and it seems like it is an automatic downshift when you get past that point. Maybe it was designed like this to keep drivers right foot light on the pedal for fuel economy? Whatever the reason being, it just doesn't not have enough spring tension or resistance when driving normally.

The instruments are fine to look at and use. The radio is pretty lackluster from what I am used to driving,

Although my time behind the wheel was limited, I was a little disappointed in the new car. Maybe I was expecting more because I've always enjoyed driving other VW's in the past.

Final thought is simply that I would keep shopping if I was in the market for a new car.
 
@Johnny248:

Go drive a Golf with the 2.5L.

You'll be amazed with the difference.

The Golf is 99.8% identical to the European Golf and it was made in Germany, unlike the Jetta which is made in Mexico.

VW cheapened the Jetta to make it a bit cheaper.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure it is not a horrible car. It just isn't for me.

Going to look at:

Chrysler 200
Kia Forte
Ford Focus
Hyundai Elantra
Subaru Impreza
 
Was this a GLI Jetta with the turbo 2.0 or just a regular model with the 2.0 NA?

I think it's a noticeable step down from the previous gen, but she only paid 16k, something you weren't able to do before 2011. I still found the driving experience pretty good for a little car.
 
Originally Posted By: antiqueshell
@Johnny248:

Go drive a Golf with the 2.5L.

You'll be amazed with the difference.

The Golf is 99.8% identical to the European Golf and it was made in Germany, unlike the Jetta which is made in Mexico.

VW cheapened the Jetta to make it a bit cheaper.


I've read good things about it, but I was sorta looking for a car with a trunk and not a hatchback
 
Originally Posted By: Johnny248


I've read good things about it, but I was sorta looking for a car with a trunk and not a hatchback


Why?

The Golf has a tonneau cover to hide any contents and you can hold more stuff in it too, a much more practical car as well, IMO a hatchback looks sportier too.
 
Last edited:
The new one is considerably cheaper on the inside than the previous generation was. My brother intentionally found an "old" new one for that reason alone.
 
Originally Posted By: antiqueshell
Originally Posted By: Johnny248


I've read good things about it, but I was sorta looking for a car with a trunk and not a hatchback


Why?

The Golf has a tonneau cover to hide any contents and you can hold more stuff in it too, a much more practical car as well, IMO a hatchback looks sportier too.


Why? I guess because I already have one hatch back car. It seems like they tend to have less road noise? (I know you can't generalize every car). Personally they just look to much like an Egg? I had a ZX3 a long time ago. Same kind of look.
 
Johnny248,

Have you checked out the Mazda3? I am real picky about how cars drive and I found the Mazdas to my liking and they are great values to boot. Good luck with the search.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Johnny248
I'm sure it is not a horrible car. It just isn't for me.

Going to look at:

Chrysler 200
Kia Forte
Ford Focus
Hyundai Elantra
Subaru Impreza


Don't leave out the Dodge Avenger...it's built on the same design as the 200. Do leave out the 4-cylinder. The V6 is MUCH nicer to drive and gets the same gas mileage.
 
Also, look at a Cruze. With the 1.4T engine and a stick-shift, it's a fun car to drive.

Oh yeah, seconded on the 200/Avenger. The latest ones are very nice on the inside. Chrysler has made HUGE strides in interior quality.

Sounds like VW didn't tune the suspension that well. The two cars we own are strut/twist-beam, and they ride/handle pretty well. The engineers at Honda and Chevrolet put lots of emphasis on chassis tuning, and it shows.

I recently drove an Impreza hatchback with the 2.0 and CVT. I generally liked it. It wasn't the fastest, it wasn't the best-handling, and the driver's side armrest was frustratingly low on the door. The seat was comfy, it rode well over the broken pavement around Buffalo, NY, and had good pickup when needed. The hatch area looked like it was pretty roomy. It's a practical car, and it shows. It's the car I'm trying to convince the MIL to buy.
 
Originally Posted By: Johnny248
It almost seems like the engineers measured once, and cut once with the setup. It just feels strange to drive. It almost feels like the steering wheel is too far in the center of the car. For instance, my right knee is smashed against the center console, and I have to reach with my left arm for the arm rest. The steering wheel and seating is too centered in the vehicle? I may be crazy, but it just felt like that to me as soon as I pulled out on the street.


Nope, you're not crazy. C&D and other publications have noted that. They seemed to indicate that the measure once, cut once as you indicated was done on a Passat and doesn't translate as well to the Jetta.
wink.gif
 
I think it's absolutely great VW offers a (relatively) inexpensive, de-contented people mover. It's like going back to their roots.

I come from an era when people drove 1960's to early 70's beetles as family vehicles. My family had several. Wanna talk about basic? We knew no different at the time I guess. You were pretty cool in high-school if you had a Scirocco.

Given my exposure, I have a hard time associating VW with all the 'luxury' people speak of on this board anyway! A basic cheap Jetta sounds perfect to me.

Joel
 
Originally Posted By: JTK
I think it's absolutely great VW offers a (relatively) inexpensive, de-contented people mover. It's like going back to their roots.

I come from an era when people drove 1960's to early 70's beetles as family vehicles. My family had several. Wanna talk about basic? We knew no different at the time I guess. You were pretty cool in high-school if you had a Scirocco.

Given my exposure, I have a hard time associating VW with all the 'luxury' people speak of on this board anyway! A basic cheap Jetta sounds perfect to me.

Joel


I agree with everything you say, but when they cheapen the suspension and steering quality, that is where they lose me with the Jetta. I am not sure if they cheapened up the underpinnings on the Passat.
 
All the talk about Jetta being cheapened out and not a driver's car remind me of Porsche purists. They lamented at water cooling etc. But guess what, general public buys them in droves. Same thing with Jetta, people are buying them.

VW at least had the foresight and corporate willingness to acknowledge that Jetta cannot compete as the German entry luxury car because VW was never about luxury. Also there is always a better built Golf or Passat for those seeking built quality. Meanwhile the current Jetta is better positioned to compete with Corollas, Civics and Elantras, smart move I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom