Some thoughts about the topic:
1) I find it ironic that many BITOGers who obsess about filtration see no inherrent harm in filling a filter in the center hole, which is AFTER the media in terms of flow. Somehow, these folks who are finicky on finite filtration don't seem to realize that "new" oil is not always "clean" oil ... And so, there is potential harm that can come from this practice. It is not an assurance of harm, but a potential for harm. Again, the irony simply amazes me about these folks.
2) Most wear in equipment comes right after the OCI, but it's not because of the filter being filled or not, but the first few thousands miles of operation as the tribochemical barrier is first stripped away by the add-pack. Only after a few thousand miles of operation will the oxidation start to postively have effect on wear rates. Those of you who worry about "wear" from a dry filter are fooling yourself as to the importance of a few seconds of "dry" start. When you OCI, it's not like the tribochemical barrier IMMEDIATELY dissolves and you're at "metal to metal" contact. That barrier errodes over the first few hundred miles, and then the oxidation promotes the development of the barrier again. Purchase, read and understand SAE 2007-01-4133, and read my article on "normalcy" of UOAs. The data from MILLIONS of miles of testing confirm this to be true. The wear from a "dry start" is so freakin' infintessimally small in terms of overall wear it's past being moot. Only a BITOGer would consider this worthy of breath ...
3) There is no credible study that I'm aware of that reveals any evidence whatsoever as to the wear patterns of either practice when contrasted to each other (filling v. not filling). If you know of one, for goodness sake please post it up. Don't link some silly theory from your neighbor's 1968 Chevelle that spun a bearing after an OCI; give me credible proof in a well-controlled study from a recongizeable entity such as SAE, PERA, etc. Want to know why there has not been a study done? It's simple ...
How much time and money would need to be spent to contrast the following methodology:
a) perform an O/FCI
b) start engine and let run until pressure fully realized
c) shut down and start over at step "a"
How many times would you have to do this to equate to 5k miles of "normal" driving? You see, we know with near-absolute certainty how much wear comes from "normal" habits. We can show with great definition that the variance of "normal" engine wear is FAR, FAR greater than one filter exchange method over another. Some folks always pre-fill; some never pre-fill. And yet UOA data shows the varianace of normalcy far exceeds that of one filter change method. So the ONLY way to definitively invoke wear unique to the filter exchange method would be to eliminate all driving and ONLY focus on the starts. You'll send me a PM when you've completed that study in your garage, eh?
4) The media will always be protected by the bypass valve, even if you don't fill and have a "dry start". The media is no more likely to be damaged at a dry start than when you open the BP valve during a cold start event with high-vis lube. I see this as the "ying" to the "yang" of pre-filling. Either way you're going to get unfiltered oil downstream of the media for a short time. Get over it guys; it' happens either way. And because of this, I lead into my final point ....
5) This "debate" is yet another example how BITOG has degraded from a "test and see; let's prove a hypothesis" to a "I think ... I feel ..." lube-wetted fantasy FaceBook pretender.