Do people still use home stereo systems?

Nowadays most of my music listening takes place at my desk when working on a computer. Here is what I have:

1. Source: PC (USB output)
2. DAC: Loxjie D30, using AK4493 DAC chip
3. Amp: Emotiva A-100
4. Speakers: KEF Q150 (high passed to the sub at 80 Hz)
5. Sub: SVS SB2000

I do have a basic 3.1 HT setup in the living room as well. Planning to redo it once we move.
 
Last edited:
As a little kid I remember being in awe of the Klipschorn speakers my Uncle had. Which is what set me on the path of interest in audio equipment. In Highschool I wandered into a high-end audio store, and was stunned by what I saw and heard. From then on high quality sound reproduction has been important to me.

About twenty years ago my Uncle who had long been out of the audio equipment lifestyle, heard my good but not extravagant system, and was hooked again. He started researching different components, and eventually settled on what he wanted, and started acquiring components.

About 15 years ago my Uncle had acquired his dream audio system. Then was diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer, and was gone three months later. His wife asked me what she should do with the system, and I told her she should do whatever she felt was best. I advised selling it, as it represented a substantial investment. The money from which could make her retirement years more comfortable. About a week later she said she had thought about it, and felt that my uncle would want me to have the system. She wouldn't entertain the thought of any compensation.


So my main inherited system is in a room that was custom built and dedicated only to it. The components are on display in a custom built rack with plenty of space around each for ventilation, and there's a place to sit and listen, and that's it.

Every time I turn it on and sit down to listen, I'm reminded of my awesome Uncle who has such a positive influence in almost every aspect of my life.

Nothing in the world like a cool Uncle.
 
If you're into sound quality, nothing touches a CD. I still use my Denon receiver and 5-disc changer with Polk speakers.
If you want to hear more accurate sound quality of the actual original studio recording, vinyl is the way to go, not CD's.
 
If you want to hear more accurate sound quality of the actual original studio recording, vinyl is the way to go, not CD's.
Depends on the age of the recording if we are being pedantic. An analog master is, arguably, going to sound more accurate on a good vinyl pressing vs a digital remaster of the analog source. A digital master is going to be more accurate on digital media, vs being converted to analog and pressed onto vinyl.

A dearth of "remastered" vinyl appeared on the scene when vinyl had a bit of a resurgence a few years back. A lot of it is absolute crap, as I've discovered, since I bought some of it, lol. It doesn't sound anywhere near as accurate as the CD's of the same recordings.

And of course what you hear from the vinyl is heavily dependant on the quality of the equipment you are using (this goes for digital too of course). The needle, the cartridge, the pre-amp, all hugely influence the accuracy of what's presented to the amplifier and speakers, and then there's the question as to whether those components (the amplifier(s) and speakers) are properly reproducing what the studio intended the recording to sound like.
 
Funny how something so old is more accurate

You can get a whole lot of different opinions on this. Some claim that analog recording has an "infinite" range, but that's really not the case given the width of a vinyl molecule or the inherent issues with analog magnetic recording.

Many in the industry say analog recording is not more accurate, but to many it's more "pleasing". But the biggest problem with analog recording is noise and distortion. Part of the signal is lost when there's noise. There's no getting around that magnetic tape, vinyl, or metallic masters have noise. And every additional analog recording step adds noise and distortion if it's an analog recorder used for mixing and mastering. And noise affects the accuracy of the recording. Pretty much all audio is recorded and mixed with digital recording these days and digital mixing. But many find the vinyl records pressed with these recordings to be more pleasing to the ear. I believe these days that a lot of vinyl master recordings are pure digital before the master record being cut.



It may not be that big a deal any more when mixing can be done on a laptop at much higher bitrates than CD audio. Vinyl also had some serious limitations where the recording master had to be tuned to prevent the needle from jumping off the groove. And a very important consideration was to prevent the cutting lathe from being damaged.

I've noted the problem with CDs is the accuracy of the timing. It's not going to be perfect if the clock is extracted from the bitstream. There were other compromises at the time, like 44.1 kHz and 16-bit quantization. These days I'd think a lot of recording studios use higher bitrates - possibly 192 kHz and 32-bit. And we certainly have the technology for audio to be stored at extremely high bitrates as sound files where it's played back with accurate clocking. Maybe in something like a ROM format. But for the most part the world doesn't care any more. It's all streaming services, audio embedded in video streams, etc. Good enough has replaced nearly perfect.
 
Still enjoy audio as a hobby. Mostly home built tube systems with horn speakers.

IMG_1274.webp


IMG_1252.webp


IMG_0759.webp
 
My first introduction to true audiophile speakers was a set Heil Air Motion Transformer's at age 18 was truly ear opening. From then on you keep up the chase.
 
When I needed to replace my early 90's Pioneer system I went component shopping. I let the Best Buy kid talk me into a soundbar (about 2010). Giving up the aesthetics of the Pioneer system with the big ol beautiful floor speakers was tough at first and I hated it. Now, I don't miss it at all.

I'm getting old. My hearing is getting worse and I can't see worth a darn, so I have no need of 'audiophile worthy' systems or 9 katrillion ultra hi def super USS Enterpriseoled displays.

YMMV - if I could see like an eagle and hear like an owl I'd probably want those things. Too many years of loud music and pew pew....

I gave those speakers to a nephew. As of 6 years ago they were still being used. I don't know if he ever replaced the woofers, but I didn't.
 
My awesome garage system was $50 total cost.

$20 garage sale - 80's Kenwood surround sound system with 5 speakers, powered sub & reciever.
$30 for Bluetooth adapter from Amazon

You can hear the Cypress Hill from 3 blocks away.
 
Back
Top Bottom