Directional trend pattern, how much worse

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 5, 2002
Messages
24,498
Location
Silicon Valley
how much worse is the noise and wear? I'm currently looking for 2-4 tires for my car (195 60 14, H rated or more) and I'm concern of not able to rotate the direction of the tire and having them feathered and develop noise issue in the long run.

I rotate my tires as soon as I feel the trend and found one direction has sharper "edge" on the trend blocks than the other, that means I rotate about every 4k miles. My tires usually last me 60k miles so as long as the cost is reasonable I don't mind paying a little more.

Top Candidates:
Bridgestone Potenza RE960AS (excellent review, but cost $26 more than the cheapest ea, that's 50% more)
Kumho Solus KH16 (trend pattern looks quiet, AA traction)
Sumitomo HTR 200 (have them, like them, but summer instead of all season)
Fuzion HRi (cheap)
General Altimax HP (directional)

Will not consider:
Michelin Pilot Sport ($$)
Firestone (comfort and noise in tirerack survey)
Sumitomo HTR A/S P01 (too new)
Kumho LX Platinum (too high of a trendwear -> low traction)
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
how much worse is the noise and wear?


None to minimal that I've noticed.

Originally Posted By: PandaBear

Top Candidates:
Bridgestone Potenza RE960AS (excellent review, but cost $26 more than the cheapest ea, that's 50% more)


Put a set of these on my GTO after the oem tires went bald, and thought they were great. If I had to buy new tires today for one of my cars, these would be it.

Be sure to get the road hazard warranty. I needed it within two weeks.
 
What car are these on?

You may want to consider purchasing a lifetime alignment/rotate/balance deal if you feel your vehicle is prone to wander out of square.

I bought a set of RE960AS some years ago, and NEVER REGRETTED IT, even with the $120 upcharge. They were that good.

Now that I think about it, they are STILL that good--my brother claimed them after my car was totaled and has been driving on them for over a year now with nothing but good things to say with 60K on the tires.
 
Win,

Do you see any significant fuel economy drop with the RE960AS? Is this the directional tire that you said isn't noisier than the non directional you had?

Kaboomba,

Tires for 97 Integra RS, steel wheels, 2700lb, no ABS or traction control, automatic transmission, commuting only basically.
 
Last edited:
Yokohama Avid ENVIGOR should also be on your list, as should the new Goodyear Assurance ComforTred touring.

Out of your list, the RE960AS Pole Position are the only tires I would consider buying.
 
There may be summer tires that perform better for the money, but if you anticipate anything other than dry summer driving, RE960AS is just about the best you can do. Really.

I think they are a slam-dunk on that car, for what you do.

Best,
 
I have General Altimax HPs on my car. I bought them unsure of how they would wear (being directional) but figured it'd be an interesting experiment, and either way they would be way better than the OEM tires that were almost out of tread at 30k miles. I've had the tires on for 30k miles so far, and I have noticed no excessive noise at all, and no uneven wear. I rotate every 6k miles with oil changes.
 
Directional street tires I have had in the past Bridgestone RE730 (discontinued)was a very impressive tire with great dry grip & wet traction that I have never experienced before. they were about $130ea. Not cheap
They were 1 step down in performance quality from the SO2.
These tires lasted 40,000mi including track days at Road America, Topeka, BIR. They remained quiet and wore well and the dry grip seemed to improve as the tread went away. On the same car I ran the Fusion HRI and there is nothing to complain about that tire, real good bang for buck sold the car after 25k and still had decent tread ran smooth.
 
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
how much worse is the noise and wear? I'm currently looking for 2-4 tires for my car (195 60 14, H rated or more) and I'm concern of not able to rotate the direction of the tire and having them feathered and develop noise issue in the long run.

I rotate my tires as soon as I feel the trend and found one direction has sharper "edge" on the trend blocks than the other, that means I rotate about every 4k miles. My tires usually last me 60k miles so as long as the cost is reasonable I don't mind paying a little more.

Top Candidates:
Bridgestone Potenza RE960AS (excellent review, but cost $26 more than the cheapest ea, that's 50% more)
Kumho Solus KH16 (trend pattern looks quiet, AA traction)
Sumitomo HTR 200 (have them, like them, but summer instead of all season)
Fuzion HRi (cheap)
General Altimax HP (directional)

Will not consider:
BFGoodrich (the noise level in tirerack survey)
Michelin Pilot Sport ($$)
Firestone (traction in tirerack survey)
Sumitomo HTR A/S P01 (too new)
Kumho LX Platinum (too high of a trendwear -> low traction)


I did extensive research on many of these tires but in a different size (245 40 18 Z) and went with the RE960AS. I've done 4k on them and just rotated. There is slight feathering on the outside edge of the front two, which are now on the back. One person said not to worry, the other person was a little more concerned. Since I had brought up the fact that the car was drifting despite balancing and alignment, I think the more worried guy felt there may still be an alignment or other issue. The alignment person said the tire may be the issue. So right now I don't know what the issue is. You can return the tires within 30 days, which perhaps I should have done. But I have heard that this problem happens with other tires as well as with my particular car.

I chose the RE960AS above the Pilot Sport A/S because the road noise was supposed to be better. I would have probably prefered the Michelin's as their quality is overall rated as better. The RE960AS do have a warranty however so that made me less worried.

Their performance is good. Definitely quiet and gives me good comfort in my hard suspension car. When you corner harder than normal, you will hear a noise from the tread. When you are in wet, you feel more traction and a better road feel. In the dry the performance is there but you don't feel it the same way as with summer tires.

If you buy warrantied tires and align them and rotate them (follow the rules of the warranty), then you have less to worry about in terms of treadwear. You can also have the tires remounted if you want to fully rotate them.

As I said, I did some extensive analysis, comparing tire rack reviews, user reviews and price to make my choice (the overall cost was $1000 so I wanted to make the right choice). Here are my findings

1) You can get the price down in many ways. I found (after I purchased the tires) that discount tire direct is cheapest as they don't have sales tax.
2) Find all the online places, print out the lowest before tax but + shipping price and america's tire / discount tire will match them (but charge a slightly higher install price)
3) I decided to use america's tire for several reasons 1) They price matched 2) I didn't want to split my tire provider from the tire installer as then you don't have a one stop shop in case of issues eg if you do a return in the first 30 days, imagine the hassle if you have to return the tires 3) they do lifetime rotations and balancing 4) my local one is very competent 5) they work hard to put things right eg I have heard them swap out tires that drift like mine are doing 6) if you have a puncture then there are many of them to go to wherever you are 7) you get quite a lot of coverage without buying their certificates
4) The tires for my size that were in contention (note that your size will have others that would work for you. Tirerack has the best info on these other options)

a) Conti Extreme DWS. These are for most people the top choice. Their wet and snow performance is way ahead of other AS tires. In fact, they perform better in the wet than the dry. Their ride and noise is slightly ahead of other AS tires. Their only downfall is being quite worse on cornering and steering response compared to the best AS (RE960 and Michelin PS AS) and a little below on dry traction.

They cost half the price per mile than the best AS tires. So if you are willing to give up some of the sporty performance and instead get ultimate wet and snow performance as well as half the cost, then these are the best tires. I came off summer ultimate performance tires so even my RE960AS are a step down but not too much. Had I gone to the DWS it would have been too much of a drop.

b) RE960 - covered above

c) Pilot Sport AS. Very close to RE960. Biggest difference is apparently the noise level. They may have a better connected feel to the road. Price wise they work out the same as RE960 due to 10k more on the warranty so don't discount them on their out of the door cost if you are considering RE960 also.

d) Kumho LX Platinum - these are touring tires. They will cost you slightly less per mile than DWS. They will give you better dry performance than DWS but quite poor wet performance.

Lastly, I balked at the cost of summer tires when I did my change. They were generally more expensive with half the expected life. But, and I found this afterwards, their typical rolling resistance is significantly less. I sense I am losing 1mpg on my RE960 vs my older summer tires. I also heard that Bridgestones are worse for fuel economy although I actually found rolling resistance figures and the Pilot Sport AS had the same rating.

You may find that the mpg difference with summer tires would pay for itself. I would also suggest looking up consumer reports where they evaluate real world treadwear and rolling resistance. It may give you more choices to consider. I saw an awful lot of recommended tires there that weren't available for me, but could be for you.
 
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Be sure to get the road hazard warranty. I needed it within two weeks.


This really depends on what other warranty is in effect. At America's tire the regular warranty would have probably covered you for everything the extra cost one would have at 2 weeks.
 
Not going to buy warranty, for only $50 cheapest a tire and the freedom to choose my own when catching a nail, I'd take my chance.

Originally Posted By: The Critic
Yokohama Avid ENVIGOR should also be on your list


Wrong size buddy, they don't make 14 inch. They used to make Avid H4s but that's discontinued.

rjacket,

where did you find the rolling resistance numbers? There are so many choices I really don't know what is good enough and what is significantly better.
 
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Not going to buy warranty, for only $50 cheapest a tire and the freedom to choose my own when catching a nail, I'd take my chance.

Originally Posted By: The Critic
Yokohama Avid ENVIGOR should also be on your list


Wrong size buddy, they don't make 14 inch. They used to make Avid H4s but that's discontinued.

rjacket,

where did you find the rolling resistance numbers? There are so many choices I really don't know what is good enough and what is significantly better.



For low rolling resistance pointers, start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-rolling_resistance_tires
 
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Not going to buy warranty, for only $50 cheapest a tire and the freedom to choose my own when catching a nail, I'd take my chance.

Originally Posted By: The Critic
Yokohama Avid ENVIGOR should also be on your list


Wrong size buddy, they don't make 14 inch. They used to make Avid H4s but that's discontinued.

rjacket,

where did you find the rolling resistance numbers? There are so many choices I really don't know what is good enough and what is significantly better.



This is how I chose my tires.

1) Got the best rated ones from tire rack across categories
2) Entered their performance numbers in a spreadsheet. Used both user reviews and their test reviews to do this
3) Figured out a cost per mile
4) Cross referenced against consumer reports. Useful to have things like rolling resistance and a real world treadwear indication
5) Considered carefully what was important for me. I had ultimate performance summer tires that wore down quickly, were noisy, uncomfortable but had superb cornering. I was willing to give up some of the cornering for big improvements in noise and comfort. I also wanted good wet performance because in CA people don't know how to drive in wet conditions and when your tread is at 4/32 let alone 2/32, your wet performance really suffers, so summer tires useful life is even shorter if it's wet.

In your case, take the tires you have now and enter them into the spreadsheet. Then you'll be able to see exactly how your tire compares against the others you are considering.

Then go one by one row in your spreadsheet and compare each tire on multiple criteria, picking a winner on performance. Rank them as you go and then at the end pick the one that gives you the best price performance result.

Two things on price

1) Think of cost per mile for real comparisons. It's a good tie breaker when you have ranked your tire and there is a tie
2) Also consider how low the cost of tires is compared to the cost of motoring and the time you spend in your car.

My tires worked out as 2c a mile. The Conti DWS were less than 1c a mile. So from a cost saving point of view the choice was DWS.

However, over time my tires cost $1k to put on for 40k / 3-4 years. DWS were going to be $700 for 60k / 5-6 years. At the end of the day, although the DWS were a great choice, the RE960 were so much better on dry performance that the $120 a year extra was worth it for me living in CA. I never drive in snow and the wet performance of the RE960 is anyhow great (just the DWS are out of this world).

Lastly, remember all of this is relative. On another car I might have chosen the DWS even in CA because their tread life, cost, comfort, noise levels, wet performance are all top of the class. But my personal expectations for dry performance was higher so I went with the RE960. I know that people with exactly the same car as me went with the DWS from none summer tires and are happy. So compare against what you have now and what you feel is important for you to improve on.
 
Last edited:
Consider the Altimax RT.
The BMW I just bought came on these tires, which the selling dealer had just had put on new, and they seem to work very well, with plenty of grip, and they aren't directional.
I have seen no real tire noise, including a tight S-curve through which I took the little BMW fast enough that my wife told me "Okay, that was too fast".
I replied that it really wasn't, since the car was not really being worked, and that if the driver (me) wasn't scared, she shouldn't have been either.
She then dredged up a near head-on collision that happened twenty five years ago, and said that I wasn't scared then, either.
After many years of happy marriage, I know when it's my cue to shut up.
Anyway, the RT is cheap, and it seems to work pretty well.
I would not have put these tires on this car, since I have returned to Michelin based upon recent experience with other brands, but I have been happy with them in the six hundred miles I have driven the car.
My point is that the RT seems to have plenty of grip, rides well, is quiet, and looks meaty enough to be decent in the snow, not that the car I have them on is likely to be driven over the winter.
 
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Consider the Altimax RT.


Don't have my size, and I need H rated (for legal liability reason I wouldn't go below factory spec). The Altimax HP seems like a good choice too however.
 
Originally Posted By: PandaBear
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Yokohama Avid ENVIGOR should also be on your list


Wrong size buddy, they don't make 14 inch. They used to make Avid H4s but that's discontinued.


Then look at the BFGoodrich g-Force Super Sport A/S H&V. Very well rated tire on TireRack considering its super low price with the rebate-- about $67/tire shipped after the rebate. It is made by Michelin, so I would expect the quality to be very good, even if its not an actual Michelin branded tire.
 
Discount Tire/America's Tire has Riken Raptor, UTQG 520 A A (Made by Michelin) in your size with H rate for $41/ea. It's non-directional tire. RE960AS is twice as much at $84/ea at Discount Tire/America's Tire.
 
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
Discount Tire/America's Tire has Riken Raptor, UTQG 520 A A (Made by Michelin) in your size with H rate for $41/ea. It's non-directional tire. RE960AS is twice as much at $84/ea at Discount Tire/America's Tire.

Rikens, Wanlis, NEXENs and nankings are used by either slimeball used car salesman or people who put $10 of gas in their car-- and Shing doesn't fit into either of those categories.

Buying any of those aforementioned tires is no different than buying and wearing a bright pink shirt because it was on sale for $2. Have some self-respect, jeez.
 
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Buying any of those aforementioned tires is no different than buying and wearing a bright pink shirt because it was on sale for $2. Have some self-respect, jeez.


http://www.mbworld.org/forums/wheels-tir...ken-raptor.html

The last thing I want after the my 7 out of 8 Dunlop SPA2 self destruction is a roll over due to tire explosion.

$2 bright pink shirt is great for oil change. Actually I've used Wynstar Phaser R23 before and they were great for what it was. But that's back when I made below minimum wage, I'd take a $50 Fuzion HRi over $41 Riken now that I make a bit more, have a wife, and is afraid to die.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom