fox pollquote:
Originally posted by keith:
None. It was Al Qaeda.quote:
Originally posted by Scott P:
How many conservatives blamed Clinton for 9-11?
Keith.
oliver north
robert novak
gary aldrich
andrew sullivan
fox pollquote:
Originally posted by keith:
None. It was Al Qaeda.quote:
Originally posted by Scott P:
How many conservatives blamed Clinton for 9-11?
Keith.
This is not what keith meant and you know it tweeker! These discussions just spin and cycle.quote:
NEWSMAX.COM-By a margin of 2 to 1, Americans blame ex-president Clinton over President Bush for failing to stop last September's terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, a new Fox News/Opinion Dynamics survey reveals.
No, and it would assure 4 more years of Bush having the unthrottled reins on our military and "borrow and spend" politics.quote:
I can't see an "October Surprise" terrorist attack having the same effect that it did in Spain. I doubt that the U.S. would turn tail and run like little girls (see Spain). If the American people would back down, they are done as a nation.
Gary, I agree that there are going to being economic repercussions, not only from the the military spending, but from the Government current and capital account deficits as well as the enormous consumer debt that exists. IMHO, this will come home to roost in Bush's 2nd term. Imediate steps should be taken, but we know that isn't going to happen in an election year. Don't get me wrong, I would rather see Pee Wee Herman in office than J. Kerry. Bush didn't make this financial climate, it is purely a cyclical issue. Sept. 11 had a horrific long term effect on the econmy and the Iraq war, while expensive, is prudent in the long run. The coming economic hardship will get pinned on Bush, but its been a generation in the making. IMHO!quote:
Originally posted by Gary Allan:
No, and it would assure 4 more years of Bush having the unthrottled reins on our military and "borrow and spend" politics.quote:
I can't see an "October Surprise" terrorist attack having the same effect that it did in Spain. I doubt that the U.S. would turn tail and run like little girls (see Spain). If the American people would back down, they are done as a nation.
The Dems have no one to put in office this round. They're waiting to put Hillary in the oval office next term. The Rubs will almost assure that if the bill for their "borrow and spend" habits comes due in Bush's second term. Ronnie's spending habits cost Bush Sr. his second term and I think the cycle of "spend to pay" has quicked since then. The "trick" that the Rubs need to pull off is to allow a Dem victory after Bush conpletes his second ....and have the full weight of their damage (borrow and spend) fall during the Dems term in office.
Yes, I agree. We've been heading for the economic cliff for a while. It's hard for fight politics as usual when, so far, most of our daily lives haven't skipped a beat. We fought two wars in that country and in neither case did we have one hiccup here stateside.quote:
Sept. 11 had a horrific long term effect on the econmy and the Iraq war, while expensive, is prudent in the long run. The coming economic hardship will get pinned on Bush, but its been a generation in the making. IMHO!
..or did they? Haven't we been "hurt" to a great degree beyond what the attack destoyed? Haven't we had a radical change in our society because of it? Didn't fear of terrorism fill our minds even though we're more likely to die of high colesterol? Aren't we going to assure that the regions inhabitants get included into the modern world (as in employment, security, etc.) to eliminate the conditions that allow such radical actions?quote:
These Islamic terrorists are not as smart as some people give them credit for. They badly misjudged America in the 9-11 attacks-they thought this country would be broken by the attacks.