Again you left out one important piece, the cost of installing the solar system. That needs to be amortized over the life of the system.
No, that's not true. The solar system cost did not change because of the Tesla and neither did my incremental cost.
In finance, the cost of the solar system is known as a sunk cost; it does not fit in the equation.
I am simply getting more benefit out of the asset.
But let me play along...
I bought the solar system before the Tesla; I thought one day I might buy an EV but certainly not in any relevant range.
However, the Tesla gets me to break even point sooner.
Not only that, but the solar project increased the value of my home.
I am pretty good at math. I am pretty good at statistics. I am pretty good at statistical forecasting. And not bad at corporate finance...
I also have to present plans like this, with cost numbers and expected returns, to CEOs and CFOs of multi billion dollar Silicon Valley companies.
They can come up with some pretty humbling questions, lemme tell ya.
Question for you: Do you think PGE electricity rates just might go up over the next 20 years?
Every financial decision I make is based on a minimum of 5 years. 15 or 20 is better.
The solar project was an investment with an expected return as well as a hedge against rising energy costs.
My goal was to minimize my incremental cost of housing going forward with the goal of longtime financial security while minimizing risk.
@UncleDave - I am not sure I follow your post. Please chime in on my calculations if you wish...