I'm not even sure I know what autocross is. I'll have to look it up.Getting the old Camry ready to autocross Shel?
New wheels, coilovers, strut brace a while ago...
Oh, I must've missed that one! What was the concensus? I've never found anything bad about strut tower braces but I'll be the first to admit the only cars I've installed them on were probably pretty much rusty and flexy already and the brace helped restore them to their normal handling.I dropped talking about the strut brace because of the negative comments I got when I expressed an interest in them. However, I did order one but have not yet installed it.
The standard MacPherson strut is a coil-over-shock designWhat is the advantage of coil-overs compared to a regular, or typical, suspension setup?
Google is sort of wrong... yes, you lower the car (or raise the car), but you perceive the handling to be sportier because you dumped a lot of money on it, but you really screwed up your suspension geometry, especially your roll center. It's done more for looks than anything else.Google says.....A coilover suspension is installed when you want to lower your car and/or achieve sportier handling. In addition to flexible lowering, most coilover suspensions also have other adjustment options. In addition to the hardness, the driver can often also adjust the rebound or compression damping....That was easy.
I think the median of the comments was that for your car and driving you may or may not notice anything different but it certainly won't hurt anything.I dropped talking about the strut brace because of the negative comments I got when I expressed an interest in them. However, I did order one but have not yet installed it.
These are my favorite wheels for a Camry. Available on Tirerack.com, Enkei Performance PX-10 in gloss black or gunmetal grey. Weigh in at 16.6 lbs, $165 per, 16x7 with a 38 offset.I'm not even sure I know what autocross is. I'll have to look it up.
I've wanted lighter-weight alloy wheels since I purchased the car, and when it's time to replace the rubber I'll get new wheels.
I've no interest in coil-overs, just curious about 'em.
I dropped talking about the strut brace because of the negative comments I got when I expressed an interest in them. However, I did order one but have not yet installed it.
Those are some that I'm considering. I've been happy with Enkei in the past.These are my favorite wheels for a Camry. Available on Tirerack.com, Enkei Performance PX-10 in gloss black or gunmetal grey. Weigh in at 16.6 lbs, $165 per, 16x7 with a 38 offset.View attachment 173409
That won't happen. I went through my K&N phase in 1993 and after a while dumped the filters and went back to stock and never looked back.I think the median of the comments was that for your car and driving you may or may not notice anything different but it certainly won't hurt anything.
![]()
for functional upgrades.
Wait until you start asking about K&N Cold Air Intakes....
B/c strut braces really don't do a thing - most of what you read is placebo. Modern vehicles have a taut unibody that this will do v. little to improve.I'm not even sure I know what autocross is. I'll have to look it up.
I've wanted lighter-weight alloy wheels since I purchased the car, and when it's time to replace the rubber I'll get new wheels.
I've no interest in coil-overs, just curious about 'em.
I dropped talking about the strut brace because of the negative comments I got when I expressed an interest in them. However, I did order one but have not yet installed it.
Tell that to BMW.B/c strut braces really don't do a thing - most of what you read is placebo. Modern vehicles have a taut unibody that this will do v. little to improve.
The typical bar between the strut towers and across the trunk aren't reducing understeer like they are advertised. I'm sure there is some measureable reduction in body flex (tiny) but whether some dude driving his car on a highway on ramp will ever be able to actually benefit/feel it is a highly suspect to me.
I had a strut tower brace on my old 88 Camry, taken from a ES250, which did make a noticeable difference in chassis rigidity up front.The typical bar between the strut towers and across the trunk aren't reducing understeer like they are advertised. I'm sure there is some measureable reduction in body flex (tiny) but whether some dude driving his car on a highway on ramp will ever be able to actually benefit/feel it is a highly suspect to me.
That's a pretty wild bar setup there.
I've heard of folks reporting chassis bracing reducing creaking on some cars.I had a strut tower brace on my old 88 Camry, taken from a ES250, which did make a noticeable difference in chassis rigidity up front.
On my MK4 Golf, I had a WRDusa rear stress bar, it definitely helped to get rid of the rear body flex (and squeaks, that was common on the MK4 Golf/GTI), not to mention I also had a Shine Racing Real Street Suspension on it at that time.
On some performance trims of sedans, they put a rear seat chassis brace and got rid of the split folding seats.
You would think engineers with supercomputers doing modeling & simulation of the unibody know something, at the manufacturer level, likewise, the suspension geometry M&S before the aftermarket comes in and ruins the suspension geometry for perceived improved performance (lower center of gravity isn't everything)