Originally Posted By: raytseng
There are 2 variables though. The higher fuel additive is only one; there is the obvious one that the octane and base fuel is also different.
Why have people jumped to the conclusion that the behavior is just because of the different fuel additives dosage?
Why is the difference in octane as a variable completely ignored?
To have confidence to make the above statement, he needs to runs regular and also add fuel additive that matches or even exceed the premium concentration, then you can say it's because of additives and everything else was equal.
I think you and I have two different understandings of the words, "completely ignored." Octane and timing was discussed throughout the thread as a possibility, and is plausible, IMO.
I might even ask my wife to start filling up with 89, just to see what possible effect there might be. I expect none, but it's a cheap experiment. I also don't have the ability to data-log on her car, so any difference either of us notices will be nearly worthless, so long as the difference isn't dramatic...