I’d say different. Full synthetic vs syn blend.I am not clear whether this media is considered better than the one in the Microgard/PG/Pentius Vietnam filters, any takers on that?
Is there a way to know the 20micron and 25micron efficiencies compared? Apologies if I can’t find it summarizedI’d say different. Full synthetic vs syn blend.
@Glenda W. posted this in another thread.Is there a way to know the 20micron and 25micron efficiencies compared? Apologies if I can’t find it summarized
The white synthetic media is 99.5%@25 microns. Here is the PG version of the EP. Same filter different color.I have that information.
The white media depicted in the start of this thread is almost certainly not the same.
I have two Carquest Premiums, one Microgard Select, and one Pentius all in oversized Subaru fitment cut apart on my bench right now (thread incoming?) and I almost bought this Carquest EP on accident. I figured “known” efficiency data trumped none, as my searching (which admittedly isn’t great on this site on mobile) can’t find data on this white Extended Performance media.
So "standard" premium PG filters (CQ Prem, MG EP, etc) are 99% @ 25 and the new white filters are 99.5% @ 25? Is that a real world difference to chose one over the other assuming cost was the same or similar?The white synthetic media is 99.5%@25 microns. Here is the PG version of the EP. Same filter different color.
View attachment 311065
The Extended PG is 99.9%@25 microns. 10k milesSo "standard" premium PG filters (CQ Prem, MG EP, etc) are 99% @ 25 and the new white filters are 99.5% @ 25? Is that a real world difference to chose one over the other assuming cost was the same or similar?
Assuming that 98.7 (absolute) at 15 is valid (I have no reason to question it) that's a new level of filtration efficiency. As far as I know, I've not seen any actual official evidence of absolute filtration of 15 microns being offered to the broader market. The leading filters will claims something 99.x or so at 20 or 25, but nobody as far as I can tell has claimed absolute levels of 15 microns.The PG EX filters are 99.5%@20 microns and 99.9%@25 microns.
Love talking filters!
Yes, I’ve called PG several times now and the official PG EX(Extended Life) efficiency range is as follows. This also applies to the 10k filters made by PG for others.(Carquest Premium, Microgard Select etc.)
98.7%@15 microns(absolute)
99.5%@20 microns
99.9%@25 microns
The website has finally been updated for the EX showing 25 as the micron rating. The regular 5k filters are still incorrect and show the EX range like above(15-25).
PG has factories in Vietnam, China, and S. Korea. You will see some slight differences between factories but QC remains fantastic...
Here’s more details. PG made Service Pro Extended Protection 10k filter.Assuming that 98.7 (absolute) at 15 is valid (I have no reason to question it) that's a new level of filtration efficiency. As far as I know, I've not seen any actual official evidence of absolute filtration of 15 microns being offered to the broader market. The leading filters will claims something 99.x or so at 20 or 25, but nobody as far as I can tell has claimed absolute levels of 15 microns.
This is a big deal.
Gotcha. So unless you are running longer intervals, there really isn't any benefit for people running those ~5k intervals?The Extended PG is 99.9%@25 microns. 10k miles
The new EP and Ultimate Synthetic are 99.5%@25 microns but has a bigger holding capacity for 20k miles.
Not really. Unless you really want the nylon backing.Gotcha. So unless you are running longer intervals, there really isn't any benefit for people running those ~5k intervals?
I'm not sure I agree with that. We haven't seen the efficiency of the standard 10k "premium" filter below the 25 micron point.Not really. Unless you really want the nylon backing.
It’s posted above. You even commented on how great it was. We don’t have the efficiency on the new EP below 25 microns.I'm not sure I agree with that. We haven't seen the efficiency of the standard 10k "premium" filter below the 25 micron point.
The data shown above suggests there could be massive disparities in efficiency at particle sizes below the rated 25 micron point.
In that case, there's a lot more going on here than just the nylon backing.
Oh, I thought that was the EP. Hmm, now I'm really confused. I didn't realize the service pro "EP" was the regular CQP or MGS 10k filter.It’s posted above. You even commented on how great it was. We don’t have the efficiency on the new EP below 25 microns.
Sorry. Right now all we know about the new EP synthetic media is the advertised 99.5%@25.Oh, I thought that was the EP. Hmm, now I'm really confused.
Anyway, since the non-EP is so good, I'd agree with your comment entirely. On regular intervals, the EP probably isn't worth paying a premium to get.
Gotcha. So unless you are running longer intervals, there really isn't any benefit for people running those ~5k intervals?