Well, I am glad uc50ic4more that you agree with a couple of my suggestions.
If you research some of the previous posts here you will find where I was attacked for daring to suggest that open source software could be attacked and that perhaps malware could even be deliberately put into open source software. When I suggested that a country might be involved in allowing malware to be put into software I was attacked for suggesting that. Some people went on and on about how open source code is available to anybody and how open source code is checked. Well, nobody seemed to be checking the code for add-ons too well at Mozilla.
There has already been state sponsored cyper terrorism. I can think of at least two examples. One was an attack on certain critical computers on the internet.
I take comfort is this: I was proven correct in the end. And some of the people who attacked me can now live with their posts.
If you research some of the previous posts here you will find where I was attacked for daring to suggest that open source software could be attacked and that perhaps malware could even be deliberately put into open source software. When I suggested that a country might be involved in allowing malware to be put into software I was attacked for suggesting that. Some people went on and on about how open source code is available to anybody and how open source code is checked. Well, nobody seemed to be checking the code for add-ons too well at Mozilla.
There has already been state sponsored cyper terrorism. I can think of at least two examples. One was an attack on certain critical computers on the internet.
I take comfort is this: I was proven correct in the end. And some of the people who attacked me can now live with their posts.