car accident question

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: JTK
I've mentioned it many times here when this question comes up. A similar situation happened to me about 15yrs ago. A fellow ran a stop sign and passed in front of me from left to right. I skidded and attempted to avoid him, but smashed into his vehicle's right side, just before the right rear wheel-well. Even though the other guy admitted fault, his insurance would cover only 70% and I had to turn it over to my insurance for the remaining 30. A process they called subrogation.

My point is, don't ever assume the other party's insurance will cover all, regardless of the circumstances of the accident.


Did your insurance use subrogation against the other company to cover the 30% or did they pay the 30% on your behalf? Subrogation is when an insurance company goes after another one on your behalf if the other driver's company won't accept fault.

Sadly, when I worked in insurance the company really pressured adjusters to give both parties some fault, even if it was obvious one party was 100% at fault. They basically claimed that unless a car was completely stopped, the driver still had the possibility of "last chance avoidance". This really sucked with claims where the driver was hit head on by a vehicle who crossed over the yellow line, like you are supposed to be able to avoid that last second.
 
Jeepman- If I remember it correctly, the 70/30 split was negotiated as a result of the subrogation. I believe they wanted something closer to 50/50 originally. It was like $6K to fix my 2001 Nissan Sentra at the time, which was only like 1-2yrs old. My Allstate guy at the time said it was cheaper/easier for them just to pay than fight it further. Like I said, the guy that ran the stop sign apologized up and down on how "stupid" he was for missing the stop sign and he was ticketed by police. None of it meant anything. I fought with his insurance over it initially, then just turned it over to mine so I could get my car fixed that had already been sitting at the collision shop waiting for authorization.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: JTK
Jeepman- If I remember it correctly, the 70/30 split was negotiated as a result of the subrogation. I believe they wanted something closer to 50/50 originally. It was like $6K to fix my 2001 Nissan Sentra at the time, which was only like 1-2yrs old. My Allstate guy at the time said it was cheaper/easier for them just to pay than fight it further. Like I said, the guy that ran the stop sign apologized up and down on how "stupid" he was for missing the stop sign and he was ticketed by police. None of it meant anything. I fought with his insurance over it initially, then just turned it over to mine so I could get my car fixed that had already been sitting at the collision shop waiting for authorization.


Dang that sucks. Telling you it is easier to pay through your own insurance means having a claim on your policy. The system is rigged so the insurance companies make more money from everyone involved. Luckily, I've only been in one accident. I was stopped at a stop sign when another driver T-boned me in the driver's door, it was 100% their fault. Even then, it took a month and the threat of a lawsuit for their company to pay up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom