Hey Guys,
Subsequent to yesterday's question re: Syntec or PP for my 3.5L Chevy, I started thinking about the GM OLM.
My engine only specs dino to comply with the OLM which can go up to 12.5K under optimum conditions.
Obviously, per previous posts from others including a GM engineer, the ZDDP levels were monitored during the individual engine testings in order to develop the algorithm that works so well today. Presumably TBN of the oil as it was depleted was monitored as well.
My question for today:
Do today's long-drain synthetic oils, such as Mobil 1 EP, Castrol Edge, and Amsoil SSO allow for slower ZDDP depletion, perhaps due to improved base stocks and better chemistry?
I know that Valvoline SynPower, although not advertised as a long-drain oil, does mention using a more slowly depleting ZDDP package.
We know that the TBN deteriorates much slower in these long-drain oils, as well as starting higher in most cases. If I was to do a UOA on a premium conventional SM GF-4 oil such as Pennzoil or Chevron, measure the TBN at 0% on the OLM, will a long-drain synthetic like those above, whether they are API certified or not (this isn't a warranty compliance discussion), ran out to an extended OCI, with the OLM reset as needed, until the TBN is at an identically low reading (~1.0), still have adequate ZDDP for valvetrain protection?
Or does the ZDDP deplete sooner than the TBN does, making it highly questionable, if GM was actually testing these long-drain oils, perhaps to recalibrate the OLM algorithm, that the extended OCI can be achieved with adequate engine protection? Because if ZDDP levels deteriorate as fast for those long-drain oils as with premium Group II+ conventionals, then realistically how can drain intervals be extended?
I know that Mobil1 lists 800/900 ppm as the nominal values for the Phosphorus/Zinc levels on their EP oils, which is the same as their standard Mobil1.
Or what am I missing in this analysis?
Thanks,
Gary
Subsequent to yesterday's question re: Syntec or PP for my 3.5L Chevy, I started thinking about the GM OLM.
My engine only specs dino to comply with the OLM which can go up to 12.5K under optimum conditions.
Obviously, per previous posts from others including a GM engineer, the ZDDP levels were monitored during the individual engine testings in order to develop the algorithm that works so well today. Presumably TBN of the oil as it was depleted was monitored as well.
My question for today:
Do today's long-drain synthetic oils, such as Mobil 1 EP, Castrol Edge, and Amsoil SSO allow for slower ZDDP depletion, perhaps due to improved base stocks and better chemistry?
I know that Valvoline SynPower, although not advertised as a long-drain oil, does mention using a more slowly depleting ZDDP package.
We know that the TBN deteriorates much slower in these long-drain oils, as well as starting higher in most cases. If I was to do a UOA on a premium conventional SM GF-4 oil such as Pennzoil or Chevron, measure the TBN at 0% on the OLM, will a long-drain synthetic like those above, whether they are API certified or not (this isn't a warranty compliance discussion), ran out to an extended OCI, with the OLM reset as needed, until the TBN is at an identically low reading (~1.0), still have adequate ZDDP for valvetrain protection?
Or does the ZDDP deplete sooner than the TBN does, making it highly questionable, if GM was actually testing these long-drain oils, perhaps to recalibrate the OLM algorithm, that the extended OCI can be achieved with adequate engine protection? Because if ZDDP levels deteriorate as fast for those long-drain oils as with premium Group II+ conventionals, then realistically how can drain intervals be extended?
I know that Mobil1 lists 800/900 ppm as the nominal values for the Phosphorus/Zinc levels on their EP oils, which is the same as their standard Mobil1.
Or what am I missing in this analysis?
Thanks,
Gary