You'll see through my post's that I've never recommended an F1 10w-30 in an HDEO application. Just my personal position.3.5HTHS is the F1 requirement is it not?
11.8% Noack
http://pqiadata.org/Ford_Motorcraft__SDF_10W30.html
You'll see through my post's that I've never recommended an F1 10w-30 in an HDEO application. Just my personal position.3.5HTHS is the F1 requirement is it not?
11.8% Noack
http://pqiadata.org/Ford_Motorcraft__SDF_10W30.html
So Delvac has 4.1 and PPE 3.88. What will happen if one uses oil with 3.88 and not 4.1. I am all ears. People race vehicles with less HTHS for 24hrs in engines that develop much more heat.Those 15w-40's are at 4.0 or higher. Even the Delvac Extreme 15w-40 is 4.1 HTHS. That IS better than the PPE no matter how much you say it's not. Tell me what Heavy diesel OEM tested the PPE for their engines? Show us that this PPE has been tested with proper Heavy Duty Engine requirements.
View attachment 268438
Why then you mentioned F1?You'll see through my post's that I've never recommended an F1 10w-30 in an HDEO application. Just my personal position.
Engine absolutely understand the difference between an PCMO & HDEO w/proper specification oil. Engine testing means something. Go look at the second post where I pointed the OP to two different F1 spec'd diesel oil. Ford back spec'd all Power Strokes to F1 but you must not know that. Also, the 6.0L was never spec'd for CF so not sure why you say that. That being said your PPE exceeds CF is moot.
Even a proper F1 10w-30 would be preferable vs a European oil that's never been tested in an HD application. Do you have some HD test results for PPE? What gives?Why then you mentioned F1?
That European oil is API CF! CF was current when that engine was introduced.Even a proper F1 10w-30 would be preferable vs a European oil that's never been tested in an HD application. Do you have some HD test results for PPE? What gives?
Says the guy who was recommending Triax scammers to everyone.Nope, You are... Aren't you the one okaying an un-approved oil where I am not. See the difference?![]()
Your Wrong again, Triax is warrantied against the OEM Specifications it claims to meet. This PPE You are recommending does not meet any of OP's specifications & would NEVER be warrantied for it's use in OP's engine. Who's the scammer again?Says the guy who was recommending Triax scammers to everyone.
Wrong again! The Power Stroke 6.0L was released in 2003 while CF-4 was developed all the way back from 1994!! Do I need to include an API history chart for you?That European oil is API CF! CF was current when that engine was introduced.
It was current in 2003. API sequence is not expiring as new one is introduced. API SM, SN, and SN+ are still current regardless of the fact that API SP is the latest one.Wrong again! The Power Stroke 6.0L was released in 2003 while CF-4 was developed all the way back from 1994!!
No it does not. That is why they are in the court being sued. You know that very well, and only conclusion I can draw is that you have something to do with those scammers.Your Wrong again, Triax is warrantied against the OEM Specifications it claims to meet. This PPE You are recommending does not meet any of OP's specifications. Who's the scammer again?![]()
Nope, You are... Aren't you the one okaying an un-approved oil where I am not. See the difference?![]()
Answer me this... How has the PPE 5w-40 been tested in an HD application? I think I've been VERY clear on WHY you should not use PPE in this 6.0L. Yes, my response to your CF question was just as silly as your question. Look it up! CF is a very old spec & has nothing to do with OP's question.No, I try to figure out WHY you could/should not use PPE 5w40 in 6.0PSD.
You have not answered that simple question. You don't even seem to know what API CF is.
When i asked how API CF differs from HDEO you answer with gobbeltigoop.
Here is an example
https://pttlubricants.co.id/en/mobil-diesel/dynamic-commonrail-api-ci-4-sl-acea-a3-b4-e7/
Ofcourse it does PPE 5W40 (SN version) has API-CF. Again incoherent.Look it up! CF is a very old spec & has nothing to do with OP's question.
Personal attacks is all you have left? Shall I just start with this one to report?No it does not. That is why they are in the court being sued. You know that very well, and only conclusion I can draw is that you have something to do with those scammers.
Your obviously the one incoherent, again, CF-4 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE 6.0L POWER STROKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ofcourse it does PPE 5W40 (SN version) has API-CF. Again incoherent.
These are not personal attacks. You know very well that they are being sued, and you read that, but you are still here sharing misinformation.Personal attacks is all you have left? Shall I just start with this one to report?
YOU BROUGHT UP TRIAX BUD!!! NOT ME!!! YOU DID!!!!These are not personal attacks. You know very well that they are being sued, and you read that, but you are still here sharing misinformation.
So, why? Are you personally vested in that company then?
Sure, report.
Interestingly, International for the same engine recommends API CH-4 or API SJYour obviously the one incoherent, again, CF-4 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE 6.0L POWER STROKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!