Best Group II 5W30 ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't know man.... but swear it is what that data sheet stated. I would think it's used to mix in with other base oils has well.
 
Last edited:
Nice chart - IMO ... NOACK means little to 50% of my basic set of vehicles - just like "been there, done that" means little unless my favorite or my view point came out on top. This site is almost as hard to be objective on as pol-lit-i-cal sites ...
 
Originally Posted By: bbhero
600R has a NOACK of 2%. Not bad.


600R is a nice base oil. You could get arond 80% 600R in a 20W50, maybe 30% in a 15W40, at a squeeze, 5% in a 10W30 but sadly it's way too heavy to incorporate in a 5W30. For that you would typically need base oils in the 4 to 6 cst range.

It might be worth mentioning that if the US made 'classic' (eg tight vs the spec) 5W30's, Noack wouldn't be so bad but it doesn't; it makes 5W30's with inordinately low CCS's to beat the API's fuel economy tests. They really should be reclassified as 2.5W30's. It's the requirement to meet this much lower CCS requirement that drives Noack up.
 
Originally Posted By: turnbowm
Originally Posted By: BrocLuno
I have been saying for a l-o-n-g time that high quality dino oils are good. And I have been saying for the same amount of time that synthetics have issues. I'm not saying don't use them. I might as well be whistling in the wind to take that stand. But, I am saying be careful in your selection ...


What are the issues with synthetic oils?


Have to be careful here as some synthetics like ester based ones don't exhibit the same issues, but ... Some synthetics exhibit drain-off. You can google that and get all sorts of stuff to read. That means that the residual film is still there, but very thin. So when you fire the engine, it'll clatter and click for quit a while. That's the general downside.

Not all engines will do this, just some of them. So when you hear this, you might consider switching oils as you are hearing moving parts with some separation with little oil cushion. It's the same nature of the liquid that allows very low pour points and wide viscosity ranges like 0W-40 w/o resorting to a bunch of VII additives.

The other issue is capillary fill. It's a measurable phenomena. A good Group II+ will exhibit good capillary fill. Most synthetics will not. This is important for big end bearings. If you hear a low pitched knock on cold start, your big end rod bearings have little cushion. They'll fill after a while with pumped oil. But those first say 500 rpm, they are running pretty loose and semi-dry. If you are a drive -off kinda person, you can be loading these bearings w/o a decent oil cushion.

New motors are tight. But those of us who build loose engines or drive vehicles with 200,000+ miles on them know all about this stuff. So you choose an oil that will help you work around these issues. Most times a semi-syn will do it. Sometimes it's best just to go straight dino oil. Let your ears be a diagnostic tool. Listen to cold starts with the hood up and see what you hear ... Act accordingly.

On the plus side, the high NOAK that they are getting worked up about above means little if you are changing oil every 4K. You have not flashed off that much.

Since marine engines tend to run cooler than auto engines, they are often fed dino oil and run for 5~10,000 hours quite happily. Ships engines may run 20,000 hours before any serious work, all on dino oil. Sump temps are low(er) so NOAK is not such an issue.

So one has to examine the operating envelope of the engine at hand. Coolant temps of 205*F (norm) and sump temps of 260*F or so would tell you that a synthetic would be best, especially if a turbo is involved. But a farm tractor with a 175* thermostat and 4 gallons of sump oil will be quite happy with dino. Most stuff is somewhere in between
smile.gif
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: 4WD
Nice chart - IMO ... NOACK means little to 50% of my basic set of vehicles - just like "been there, done that" means little unless my favorite or my view point came out on top. This site is almost as hard to be objective on as pol-lit-i-cal sites ...


And because it means nothing to you, then QED, it must mean nothing to other people? That's a really interesting take on the word 'objectivity'…
 
Well that really does make sense. Gain here, lose there. So to speak. I believe that the 5w30 "conventional oils" now are really just synthetic blends. In fact Chevron/Havoline data sheets for their conventional oil states it is a synthetic blend. This is due in large part to the NOACK having to be less than 15%. I would even bet the Dexos oils that are synthetic blends are probably 2/3 to 3/4 group 3s.
 
Originally Posted By: bbhero
Well that really does make sense. Gain here, lose there. So to speak. I believe that the 5w30 "conventional oils" now are really just synthetic blends. In fact Chevron/Havoline data sheets for their conventional oil states it is a synthetic blend. This is due in large part to the NOACK having to be less than 15%. I would even bet the Dexos oils that are synthetic blends are probably 2/3 to 3/4 group 3s.


Dexos oils are a sort of US/European hybrid oil. By definition, they have a maximum Noack of 13% (like ACEA oils). This might not seem such a big deal versus the 15% max that ILSAC allows but in oil formulation terms, it's a BIG difference. There's no way you would logically put something like Chevron 100R in a Dexos oil. You would have to get your CCS requirements from light Group III (say Yubase 4). For a given base oil viscosity, Group III's exhibit a lower Noack than Group II's (and I's which are more or less the same) so you automatically get a lower finished oil Noack. However it doesn't stop there. By putting in some Group III, you open the door to putting more, heavier Group II into the blend. Furthermore, by putting a high VI base oil like Group III, all things being equal, you need less VII polymer which in turn allows you to incrementally put more heavy Group II in the finished oil which again, drops Noack. So you see, you create something of a virtuous circle by working to a 13% Noack spec.
 
Last edited:
Objective? I try - and perspectives that too - and emotions aside - I have two GDI, and two injected ... And a bunch of large bore industrial engines in my actual life ... That is what I deal with ...
Doubt that is too far from some folks on this site ...IMO - 90% of the world does not know what NOACK is ... Nor do they drive or even know they have a "dependent" vehicle ...
As I have stated - the most brain dead to all this in the world just completed 400k on Mobil Super ...
 
Well this really makes sense to me. I do like the ACEA A1/B1 and A5/B5 specs being listed along with Dexos and HTO-06. If an oil is passing all three then it is a very good oil I would think. Havoline Pro DS 5w30, Quaker State Ultimate Durability 5w30, Pennzoil Ultra Platinum 5w30 Castrol gold bottle 5w30 and Mobil 1 5w30 all meet both Dexos and HTO-06. Only Pennzoil Ultra Platinum mentions meeting the ACEA A1/B1 and ACEA A5/B5 in addition to those other specs.

The generic API SN, ILSAC GF-5 specifications are fine. But the tougher specifications are always nice to have as well.
 
Just in case anyone out there thinks I'm being particularly beastly to Chevron, here's a link to Motiva's Group II base oil properties (you will have to download the PDF to see the table)...

http://www.motivaenterprises.com/products-services/motiva-base-oils/products-star-base-oils.html

Motiva is owned by Shell which in turn is owned by the Brits and the Phlegms so no need to get your US knickers in a twist.

Again note that Motive 4 has a typical Noack of 24.3% and can go as high as 28.0%. Does that qualify as being 'ropey'? I'd argue it does.
 
I knew about the Saudi connection to Motiva oil refining (it goes back ages to the old Equilon days) but I had in my mind that the Motiva base oil operations were all 100% Shell owned? Shell have a massive presence in US engine oils via Pennzoil & Quaker State and have a huge appetite for base oils whereas the Saudis have...errrr...nothing?? I may well be wrong, in which case I stand corrected.
 
Last edited:
Well I will have to say that Chevron/Havoline Pro DS runs very good in my car. And it's Dexos approved and HTO-06 approved as well. Chevron makes very good oils for the US market.
 
SA took over the Port Authur refinery ... Folks waiting to hear what changes are coming ... Lots of races to the GTL trend ... Not just the big projects ... There is a modular GTL set up near me where they can take a small amount of gas production and make liquids ... think if oil prices recover - other model syngas projects will go larger ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom