One more time, banning a specific breed or breeds won't work. There are plenty of other breeds to abuse and create problems. We need to change the behavior of the owners of vicious dogs. I am sick of knee jerk ban this and that.
I bite tooquote:
Originally posted by Dan4510:
Any dog can bite anyone at any time with enough provocation. First it was dobermans, then german shepards, then chows, now "pitt bulls" that no one can define.
I agree that it really comes down to the owner. We need a three strike law for dog bites.quote:
Originally posted by labman:
One more time, banning a specific breed or breeds won't work. There are plenty of other breeds to abuse and create problems. We need to change the behavior of the owners of vicious dogs. I am sick of knee jerk ban this and that.
quote:
Originally posted by Audi Junkie:
I was never around a dog that had a problem with me except one, a pit-bull, "Pete". He lived on my street with some of the young people at school, ownership of him transfered every semester. Anyway, the dog would look for me in a whole house full of people and proced to bite me. Maybe it's my Alpha thing? The "owners" would just move him to another area until someone else let him out....back to the same thing. I stood on his head until he yelped once, then the owners got the idea. I've had Rotts and Rott mixes, totally different dog imo, unless it is trained to kill. My current lil Rot-looking mix was shreaded open on his side when I found him. A 6 inch gash with necrotic flesh, I asked the neighbourhood ghetto kids he was running with who was going to get him fixed-up? Noone had any money so I took him to U.Penn Vet. Best dog ever. All dog owners should have insurance, then let the insurance co actuarys figure out what is dangerous as far as dogs and owners. "Ok, you're 19 and want 3 pit-bulls?, that's $4000 a year in insurance". 60 y/o with a Poodle? $40 year.
While spay/nutering tends to reduce tendencies to bite, it is completely effective in preventing passing on genetic agressiveness. It would also put pressure on people owning breeding stock. Properly train and control your dog or lose its breeding potential.quote:
Originally posted by moribundman:
I'll consider any animal (or human) that can reach my groin area a potential threat. Body mass, size, size of mouth and teeth are also to consider.quote:
It is just folly to judge a dog by its breed.
''That seems more of a size thing than specific to any breed. Get rid of ALL larger dogs?'' Labman
Neutered dogs don't bite? How about putting rubber crowns over their teeth?quote:
Maybe if we are going to pass laws, we should force the owner to spay/neuter any dog that ever bites anybody except in self defence.
![]()
While I don't disagree on putting pessure on dog owners, I believe it will make only people with common sense comply. I've yet to see "pet inspectors" make sure pet owners comply with local (spaying/neutering) law.quote:
While spay/nutering tends to reduce tendencies to bite, it is completely effective in preventing passing on genetic agressiveness. It would also put pressure on people owning breeding stock. Properly train and control your dog or lose its breeding potential.
None of the breeds identified as Pit Bulls run over 62 pounds, or at least not their breed standard. There are plenty of larger breeds, Great Danes, Irish Wolf Hounds, Giant Schnauzers, Belgian Malinois, Newfoundlands, not to mention mixed breeds that often seem to be half hybrid vigor. And don't minimize other dogs jaw strength. My sweet, little, gentle Lab, Daisy, destroyed a Nylaball, 3'' of hard, solid Nylon. Yet after she graduated as a dog guide, her partner allowed her to play with the neighborhood children. Then there is the Galileo Souper Bone, an extra tough, solid Nylon about 3'' in diameter and 7'' long, the only thing that will stand up very long with some dogs.quote:
Originally posted by moribundman:
snip... With owning certain breeds comes increased risk, simply due to the size and strenght of the animal. Eugenics is a bad idea. Anybody remember Hitler? Does anybody really think a dog that is built like a fighting machine with the capability of crushing human femur does not pose a risk simply due to its innate capability? snip...
Density is a big share of the problem, but it's the density of the skulls of the owners more than the population density.quote:
Originally posted by Audi Junkie:
I think I would add population density to the factors in the likelyhood of a dog attack. If there are no people around, the chance of a bite goes down. Like in a crowded city, chances go up and insurance too.
The density of the skulls of those screaming for a ban is high too IMO.quote:
Originally posted by XS650:
Density is a big share of the problem, but it's the density of the skulls of the owners more than the population density.quote:
Originally posted by Audi Junkie:
I think I would add population density to the factors in the likelyhood of a dog attack. If there are no people around, the chance of a bite goes down. Like in a crowded city, chances go up and insurance too.
It would be effective to be able to charge,try and punish the dog owner for the injury/fatility the dog caused as though the owner had commited the attack himself.quote:
Originally posted by labman:
The density of the skulls of those screaming for a ban is high too IMO.