PGE is subject to CPUC like the other 5 major utilities in California..PGE is a publicly traded company. Palo Alto and Santa Clara, probably others, are public utilities and the electric rate is half PGE.
PGE is subject to CPUC like the other 5 major utilities in California..PGE is a publicly traded company. Palo Alto and Santa Clara, probably others, are public utilities and the electric rate is half PGE.
PGE is a publicly traded company. Palo Alto and Santa Clara, probably others, are public utilities and the electric rate is half PGE.
This has been the history of all energy industry since the day we chop down firewoods, then burning coal, then drilling for oil, then hydro dam, power line, fracking for gas and cooking tar sand, then solar and wind turbine.Article points out yet another hidden inequity with “renewable” energy: the placement of these systems (mostly solar and wind) are in rural areas. The massive footprint and in-situ environmental damage takes place away from the major population centers and becomes out of sight, out of mind.
Good to see rural areas fighting back and stopping these types of projects.
Maybe when coastal California allows wind turbines offshore, rural California will allow wind in their backyards.
When was the last time you see any major city having its own energy source within the urban area that isn't dumping pollution in the rural?
PA is right up there with CA in gas tax, used to be higher in PA, now CA has forged ahead a few cents. There has to be tax for roads, and these states have a lot.
What is the answer to why Santa Clara and Palo Alto are able to charge about 1/2 the electric rate of the surrounding PGE with their city owned utilities? One reason may be they have just relatively uniform and flat infrastructure to maintain. But where are they getting the power so cheap? It almost has to come from PGE. Maybe the people in difficult areas to maintain are getting subsidized by the flatlanders I don’t know. My daughter has PGE and the rate hasn’t gone up, don’t know where this article gets their info from, probably where it looks best for what they want to say. Welcome to the age of baloney, I mean information.
More solar needed. Solar everywhere.
So I guess your solution is to build a nuke in every downtown? Maybe we should all live on nuclear aircraft carrier drifting around the world, it would definitely save on temperature control, now that's an idea.
So I guess your solution is to build a nuke in every downtown? Maybe we should all live on nuclear aircraft carrier drifting around the world, it would definitely save on temperature control, now that's an idea.
How is that different than burning the gas and then sequest the CO2 back into the well?Canadian Utilities, owned by ATCO, a 22 billion publicly traded company in Canada sold their entire Canadian hydrocarbon fired electric generating assets including coal and gas fired power plants in 2019. They kept the greenie stuff. One of its current projects is to strip hydrogen from natural gas and re-inject the CO2 so the hydrogen can be considered “ Blue Hydrogen”.
Yes, but the Public Utilities Commission is supposed to monitor PGE, so it isn't that simple.PGE is a publicly traded company. Palo Alto and Santa Clara, probably others, are public utilities and the electric rate is half PGE.
It DEPENDS. The earlier EVs got short range and incentives like free charging, carpool lane accesses like the early hybrids. They were massively more expensive per mile range and they really need the free charging at work to get back home on return trip. Most people lease them and the lender manufacturer lost a ton of money when people turn in their cars.In the end, what is the cost per mile, be it EV or gas? IIRC they did not have cheap gasoline either.
I didn't vote for Enron but it still happened. I didn't vote for rural powerline triggered wild fire either but it still happened.Californians getting what they voting for.
I didn't vote for PGE. I hate PGE.Californians getting what they voting for.