Automotive News: EV industry seen shifting to 800 volt technology.

wemay

Site Donor 2023
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
18,378
Location
Everglades
Automotive News: EV industry seen shifting to 800 volt technology.
https://www.autonews.com/technology/ev-industry-seen-shifting-800-volt-technology

It's a subscription site so I'm pasting the article...

Electric vehicles make up only about one-tenth of the global market. But automakers and suppliers are preparing for the next generation of components, with solid-state batteries, axial flux motors — and now, 800-volt electrical systems that promise to cut charging time in half, sharply reduce battery size and cost and increase drivetrain efficiency.

So far, just a handful of new vehicles use 800-volt systems, as opposed to the standard 400-volt technology. Among the examples reaching the market: the Porsche Taycan, Audi E-tron GT, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Kia EV6. The Lucid Air luxury sedan uses a 900-volt architecture, but experts say it is technically an 800-volt system.

EV component suppliers say that by the end of the decade, 800-volt vehicle architectures will be the dominant technology, especially as more and more dedicated full-electric platforms such as Hyundai's E-GMP and Volkswagen Group's PPE appear.

"In 2025, the majority of applications coming into the market will be 800 volt," said Dirk Kesselgruber, president of thIMG02e electric drivetrain division at GKN, one of several Tier 1 suppliers that have embraced the technology. GKN is offering 800-volt-ready components such as e-axles, with an eye to starting series production in 2025.

"We think it's going to be the mainstream, and Hyundai has proved that it can be competitive on price," he told Automotive News Europe.

Other suppliers echo his enthusiasm.

"800 volt is the logical next step in the development of BEVs," Alexander Reich, head of innovation power electronics at Vitesco, said in an interview with the publication. Vitesco has landed big contracts for 800-volt-enabled components, including supplying inverters for Hyundai's E-GMP platform, inverters for a major North American automaker and electric motors for a leading EV maker in China.

"The 800-volt sector has grown faster than was expected several years ago, and we are seeing a lot of interest from our customers," Harry Husted, chief technical officer at BorgWarner, said via email. The supplier has won a number of 800-volt orders, including one for an integrated drive module for a Chinese luxury brand.

Why the change?
What's so great about 800-volt systems compared with existing 400-volt ones?

The advantages are numerous, experts say, starting with the premise that they can deliver the same amount of power at a lower current.

"By doubling the voltage and having the same current, you get two times the energy into a vehicle," Reich said.

The main benefit is an approximately 50 percent faster charging time for the same battery size. As a result, batteries — the costliest component in an EV — can be made smaller and overall weight is reduced, increasing efficiency.

"There is no need for 1,000 km of range in an EV" if charging times are fast enough, Reich said.

At the same time, because higher voltages supply the same amount of power with less current, cables and wires can be made smaller and lighter, cutting down on consumption of costly and heavy copper.

Less energy is lost, too, meaning better range and improved motor performance, also helped by lower weight. And there is less need for elaborate thermal management systems to ensure the battery is working at optimal temperatures.

When paired with emerging silicon carbide microchip technology, 800-volt systems can increase powertrain efficiency by up to 5 percent. Such chips lose less energy to switching, and are particularly effective for regenerative braking.

Because the new silicon carbide chips use less pure silicon, costs are potentially reduced and more chips could be made available to the auto industry, suppliers say. Other industries tend to use full silicon chips, competing with automakers for space at wafer fabs.

"Putting everything together, 800 volt is a really big deal," Kesselgruber of GKN said.

Fuel station parity
But with most existing charging stations based on 400-volt systems, is there still an advantage for cars with 800-volt architectures?

Experts say yes, though vehicles will need an 800-volt-based charging infrastructure to take full advantage.

"Much of the existing DC fast charging infrastructure is for 400-volt vehicles," said BorgWarner's Husted. "To allow the faster charging that 800 volt enables, the latest generation of high-voltage, high-power DC fast chargers will be needed."

That's not an issue for home charging, but the highest-speed public charging networks so far are limited. Reich believes it will be a particular issue for highway charging stations.

"The refill has to be as quick as fueling up at a gas station," he said. "This is the use case" for 800-volt charging.

Europe is seeing the rise of such networks.

Ionity is a multi-automaker partnership with a number of 800-volt, 350-kilowatt highway charging points.

"A 350-kW charger translates into five to seven minutes charging time for 100 km," said Otmar Scharrer, senior vice president electrified powertrain technology at ZF. That's about the same time as a coffee break, he pointed out.

"This is really a game-changer," he said. "This is something that will drive acceptance of e-mobility."

According to a recent report from Porsche, it takes about 80 minutes to add 250 miles of range at a typical 50-kW, 400-volt station. That time drops to 40 minutes at 100 kW. If the charging plugs are cooled — adding cost, weight and complexity — that time can fall to 30 minutes, Porsche said.

"A shift to a higher voltage is therefore inevitable in the quest to achieve charging times in the desired corridor," the report said. It would fall to about 15 minutes with 800-volt charging, the automaker said.

Taking into account the time to pay, "the goal of 'charging like filling up' is thus nearly within reach."

Audi says the A6 Avant E-tron concept, based on the same PPE architecture as the Taycan, can take in enough energy in just 10 minutes at a fast-charging station to drive about 186 miles.

Enabling smaller batteries
If fast-charging times mean that ever-larger batteries are no longer needed to eliminate "range anxiety," what are the implications?

Automakers can opt to benefit from faster charging with the same battery pack.

But with EVs still not yet at cost parity with internal combustion vehicles, a smaller battery may be a better choice — on both philosophical as well as commercial grounds, ZF's Scharrer said.

"It makes no sense" to equip a mainstream compact car such as the Ioniq 5 with a very large battery, he said.

In Scharrer's view, the ideal battery size for such a vehicle would be 55 kilowatt-hours, in line with the smaller 58-kWh option offered by Hyundai —provided charging times from 5 to 80 percent fall to 10 minutes.

"It's quite a challenge but it has happened in the laboratory," he said.

A combination of 800-volt charging, both in the vehicle and in the infrastructure, as well as improved chips could make that a reality, he said.

"We have to ask ourselves as a society if it makes sense to use a lot of precious materials that we dig out from the earth like lithium or cobalt, with a lot of weight and a lot of cost just for one or two [long trips] every quarter," he said.

Cautious transformation
If 800-volt technology is indeed superior and inevitable, it's worth asking why nearly all EVs are still based on 400-volt systems, including those from market leader Tesla and from VW.

Scharrer and other experts believe the answer partly lies in convenience and precedent.

The typical house uses a 380-volt three-phase current (voltage rates are actually a range rather than a fixed number), so the charging infrastructure already existed when automakers began launching plug-in hybrids and full-electric vehicles. And the first wave of EVs were built on components developed for plug-in hybrids, which are 400-volt-based.

Automakers and suppliers agree that there are advantages to faster-charging 800-volt architectures. The question is when will the technology arrive.
 
Last edited:
Purchased a 2019 Kia Niro EV last month. Wanted to buy a new one, but my income isn't high enough to take full advantage of $7,500 federal tax credit. On top of that, it's a sellers' market right now for EVs, they're charging minimum $4,000 above MSRP for Niro EV, $10,000 premium for Ioniq 5 EV, ***.

Anyway, my Niro EV can only charge up to 440v level 3 charger. I'm having hard time finding a commercial charging station near me. There's only 1 level 3 charging station in my town - Vancouver, WA, just across the Columbia River from Portland, OR - at Wal Mart 5 miles from home. I've used it for a few times but only saw 1 other vehicle charging there! Yes, there's a couple of Tesla charging stations but TESLARS ONLY!
So I installed a 240V level 2 charger in my garage, takes 8-9 hours to fully charge, I find it more than fast enough.

800v charging is nice, but where are the charging stations? Can a consumer be able to install a 800v charger at home? I doubt it. Current electric rate for my home is $0.0816 per KWH, but Electrify America charging stations charge $0.31 per KWH for members plus $4.00 a month fee. Why are we buying Electric Vehicles for if we can't charge at home? Also, Kia doesn't recommend using (commercial) fast DC charging.
 
Interesting information. Cue the naysayers....

For good reason....

This is like saying motors from the 40s, 50s and 60s are some how better than today...

They are not.

That's where this magical battery powered vehicle is at in it's development. Progress made to a decent degree.

However there are issues and limitations.

Are these vehicles worthy of being a choice for those who want them ??

Absolutely yes.

Is it patently wrong to force everyone into those vehicles ??

Absolutely yes.
 
Are these vehicles worthy of being a choice for those who want them ??

Absolutely yes.

Is it patently wrong to force everyone into those vehicles ??


This is a key point. The big rush to go electric will cause big disruptions in personal transportation. Those states that have ICE bans coming up will see Mad Max vehicles on the streets as owners keep rebuilding their vehicles as a cheaper alternative to buying a EV plus the charger.
 
"By doubling the voltage and having the same current, you get two times the energy into a vehicle," Reich said.
This quote makes no sense to me.

E = I R ; P = I E

Double the voltage indeed halves the current for the same power so that makes sense.

What is two times the energy? I don't understand that at all.
 
Cue the naysayers....
The article is disingenuous. While progress is being made, whether the battery pack is 400 or even 1000 volts makes ZERO difference to each cell's charge rate. It's pretty well understood that an overall 1C charge rate (1 hour) limits cell damage. There is a valid reason manufacturers limit charge rates.
 
No only that but the reference to 380V leaves me puzzled. Does the author not understand the concept of power conversion?
800 V architecture makes sense as a standard just because of the cost savings in the vehicle and the potential of faster charging within the CCS connector current limits.
 
I see 400v system being kept for cheap cars. Because cost..
But what is cheap anyway? Even hatchbacks cost 30000€ , 1/2 for Dino version....🤨
 
This quote makes no sense to me.

E = I R ; P = I E

Double the voltage indeed halves the current for the same power so that makes sense.

What is two times the energy? I don't understand that at all.
P=IV

In terms of current and voltage it is P=IV. The energy used is the amount of charge q moved through voltage V in a time interval t. It is equal to the integral of power over time. A common unit used to describe energy usage is the kilowatt-hour, the energy of 1000 W acting over one hour.
 
"By doubling the voltage and having the same current, you get two times the energy into a vehicle,"

I misread "having the same current" as "halving the same current".

P = I E is the same as P = I V Power equals Amps times Voltage.

Indeed, if they double the voltage but keep the current the same, then twice the energy will be going into the battery. In my industry, 600V and below is considered low voltage. Once you cross the threshold for 601V Up it becomes medium voltage, up to 13.2 kV. High voltage is greater than that but can vary. Also depends on usage (medium is distribution and high is usually from generation to substations).

Medium voltage requires special wiring insulation, clearances, and markings. If cars didn't have accidents I wouldn't see a problem with this, but even higher voltages creates higher energy potentials with corresponding higher danger.

I wonder if the IIHS and the NHTSA are buying into this?
 
When will some learn that faster rate/higher input isn't always the answer? Usually leads to more volatility and less usable lifespan. Of course the 'naysayers' will go on and on about upcoming battery technology, but it isn't evolving/improving that quickly.
 
I have to wonder.

Doubling the voltage could mean less copper. If you hold power constant then IR loss can go down. Less copper, less weight. But as pointed out, insulation requirements change. Plastic is usually less weight than copper, but it can be more bulky.

The electronics required for the higher voltage though... I'd be worried that the large geometries might be more lossy as parasitic capacitances go up, and on state resistance goes up too. Everything is a tradeoff, and sometimes you trade one parameter for another--and sometimes you eventually get a win on all of them, as the technology evolves.

I wonder if there is some gain from decreasing the voltage drop from line distribution to the car? Instead of dropping (say) 13kV to 240 is there something gained by using a higher voltage to the car? I'm guessing not, just spitballing here.

These batteries are large series/parallel affairs, right? By going to a higher voltage one is increasing the series amount while decreasing the parallel amount? usually I think paralleling batteries as a much more tricky thing than just putting into series. Could battery life management score a win here, if there is less parallel issues to watch out for?
 
I don’t know of any residence that has 3phase 380V run to the house. Industrial buildings, yes, but not residential. Lots of pseudo truths in that article. Written by someone with very limited electrical knowledge. The energy storage is BS as well. Lithium cells are nominally 3.7V per cell. Putting them in series gives you the 800v but, for the same space, halves the amount in parallel, so the same energy content (in Joules) exists. A lot of BS there. Cell balancing is important with lithium as thermal runaway leads to fires.
 
Thats mostly marketing fluff. Are there advantages...yes there are some but only "if" .

If one looks at the top 10 vehicles 1000Km trip times which are an excellent mix of range and charging speed - the rubber (electrons) meets the road here so to speak.

Tesla with its 400V architecture dominates the top 10 besting cars double or more its price.

The the 800V cars cars only win on paper.

Screen Shot 2022-04-17 at 9.20.48 AM.png
 
That’s a real snide A remark. I don’t want nor do I need a electric car.
And that's fine, you and I are free to spend out money as we choose. 100% agree.
I have said a million times these cars are not for everyone.
What I struggle with is all the people claiming the sky is falling; hence the chicken little joke.

Apologies if you took it the wrong way. My comment was not aimed at you in particuliar.
It was meant as a light heared poke at all the prognosticators.
 
Last edited:
The supply v doesn’t match the battery v in any case. The onboard charger sets the charging voltage, not the wall box. So to save weight in copper and motor parts etc with 800 v, they can do that anyway even charging with a 120 v 15 amp home wall outlet.
How safe is it for the public to be handling and abusing 800 v charging cords with their bare hands, if that’s what they are talking about? Even with 120/240 v 10 gauge public charging cords, I see them tied in knots, apparently on purpose to try and destroy them. Or the handles damaged by running over them or whatever else any random person can think of to do to them. There isn’t any watching at these charging stations I have seen. At a gas station, it seems there is someone around watching, and they turn the pumps off after hours.
 
Back
Top Bottom