I consider Start/Stop an abomination from several perspectives. I doubt if any powertrain engineer ever said "this will be a great idea to prolong engine life". Over the last 3-4 years since S/S has been widely implemented, my wife and I have made a point of conducting an informal poll of folks who own cars equipped with it: It is universally despised. My daughter has a '17 Pacifica with it...a terrific vehicle, but it has already eaten its' first set of batteries within 30K miles...and she disables it 90% of the time. The added control system complexity to make it work as seamlessly as possible adds cost and will decrease reliability, e.g. managing HVAC temp control or maintaining transmission readiness through various schemes. And the "hope" that all the vehicle systems have been beefed-up to deal with the potentially brutal duty cycle without reducing reliability is not borne out in real life.
The four-cylinder vehicles tend to shake like wet dogs during startup & shutdown...experiencing that 50+ times a day during a stop & go commute is great fun...
When new, the systems are pretty responsive, but as the vehicle ages and the fuel, ignition & start systems deteriorate, restarts will take more cranking. You'd better think twice before pulling out in front of another vehicle, since even when new it can take 1-2 seconds for the vehicle to respond to throttle input.