Auto-RX in 3.0L Camry

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: chucky2
I haven't been on this site in quite some time, thought I'd just drop by and see what was going on, thought maybe I'd drop some thoughts on this thread:

1.) Auto-RX works best when hot. It can take 20 minutes for your oil - not coolant - to get up to operating (read: hot) temp. If the majority of your miles have been under 20 minutes, then you're not really putting the Auto-RX in a position to work like it should.

2.) Auto-RX works best in high flow areas. While I'm for sure not a mechanic, the scenario's described before about how this engine circulates oil sounded credible. Given that, my reasoning would be to use the thinnest oil Toyota has cleared for use for your current temps in your engine. If they've cleared 20W, then run a conventional 5W-20; not a 0W-20, those are synthetic and shouldn't be used while on the Auto-RX regime. Using the thinnest oil should allow the Auto-RX to get into/around/past as many places as it possibly can. I remember way back a pretty highly regarded poster named MolaKule advocated this, and it struck me as making sense. Unless there's some overriding reason to use a thicker oil than the minimum spec'd for your engine @ your current outside temps, thin is what I'd be using. As far as oils, just stick with the cheapest conventional oil you can find that's SL or SM and ILSAC IL-3 or IL-4 rated. No Pennzoil Platinum, Ultra, Rotella 5W-40 (which I think Shell confirmed had esters in it now, so, that's a no-no for Auto-RX).

3.) Without going back through the thread, it was mentioned to replace the PCV valve and the thermostat, I think if you haven't done this, it'd be a worthwhile - and cheap - preventative measure(s). From back when I was a regular lurker here, I do remember that 3rd party PCV's appeared to work, but, ended up not actually working correctly, and that OEM PCV's that appeared to be clean did not always work. As cheap as an OEM PCV would be from www.rockauto.com (check if your local stores have it for at least close to as cheap, support local businesses too!), this would seem to be a cheap and easy thing to rule out as contributing to your problems. Same thing for the thermostat...if you're running colder than you should, that doesn't help your engine or the Auto-RX (since it likes heat to work).

4.) I'm sure you don't have the receipts any longer, but, unless something has markedly changed (and given how many people are victims of their products, I would actually hope that's happened), Fram's haven't had the best track record for sealed filter elements and good bypasses. If it's at all possible, I wonder if a Motorcraft filter can cross-reference appropriately to your engine? If so, that might be a good idea to run one. Not only are they very well built, but their bypass is located in the front of the filter, so you won't be washing all the [censored] back into your engine at startup. If not, then a NAPA Gold/Wix would be the next good bet.

5.) This talk about using different chemical products while using Auto-RX doesn't sound advisable honestly. We (You) already don't know what's going on in there, even before the Auto-RX. Now it's not known what's happening with the Auto-RX. Adding to the risk of all the [censored] floating around in your engine, you're thinking about subjecting it to different chemical concoctions...how is that going to affect the seals in the engine? Answer: No one knows! IMO, just stick with the Auto-RX at this point, after the last rinse phase, run another 3k with just conventional, to make sure the seals are back to their nominal state, then start playing around with other stuff if you want.

I wish you luck!

Chuck


When I read this post, it tells me that sales of auto-rx are not doing very well, if this product really worked, then auto-rx would still be a sponsor on this board, am I missing something.
 
I guess I forgot to add:

I'm not affiliated with Auto-RX, or anyone even remotely related with any aspect of the petroleum industry, in any way - I work in Telecomm.

Does that answer your question?

Because, I really don't know what you were trying to ask...

Chuck
 
I do drive normaly now. Back to work. So it's around 17 miles one way and some downtown driving, so I guess oil heats up how it should.
 
Originally Posted By: chucky2
I guess I forgot to add:

I'm not affiliated with Auto-RX, or anyone even remotely related with any aspect of the petroleum industry, in any way - I work in Telecomm.

Does that answer your question?

Because, I really don't know what you were trying to ask...

Chuck


I think someone from auto-rx either e-mailed you or maybe called you on the phone to post favorably about auto-rx, that is JMO.
 
That was extremely unfair and uncalled for. There was nothing in Chuck's posting that warranted the said response.

It is not nice to accuse somebody of wrong doing with zero even a cursory evidence.

- Vikas
 
Chucky2, as long as your not a union Verizon Telecom drone that can't get my bill and service right, I enjoy your opinion. Switching to a telecom's competitor in 4 days. Bye bye Fios, wireless...CAN YOU HERE ME NOW VERIZON?

I'm definitely not one of the pro AutoRX guys here. I've had some of my posts edited/deleted years ago during the original arx/bitog relationship. But, I would like the OP to run the 14k course that was recommended to him by Autorx.
If you can't tell, its going to be difficult since his engine eats 'GALLONS' of oil. I myself would enjoy seeing another arx failure here. If he can't run the 14k regimen, then I won't be able to negatively reference this thread for those pushing it.
If he doesn't follow the 14k regimen, the OP might not be able to push for a refund.

At this point, the OP has some hard decisions to make. I say stick with the 14k regimen an pick up 5 gallon pails of oil from the local truck stop.
 
Originally Posted By: PontiacFan
Originally Posted By: chucky2
I guess I forgot to add:

I'm not affiliated with Auto-RX, or anyone even remotely related with any aspect of the petroleum industry, in any way - I work in Telecomm.

Does that answer your question?

Because, I really don't know what you were trying to ask...

Chuck


I think someone from auto-rx either e-mailed you or maybe called you on the phone to post favorably about auto-rx, that is JMO.


LOL some people really hate A-Rx. I tried it, didn't like it, won't use it anymore, but think that reply was really uncalled for.
 
Originally Posted By: PontiacFan
Originally Posted By: chucky2
I guess I forgot to add:

I'm not affiliated with Auto-RX, or anyone even remotely related with any aspect of the petroleum industry, in any way - I work in Telecomm.

Does that answer your question?

Because, I really don't know what you were trying to ask...

Chuck


I think someone from auto-rx either e-mailed you or maybe called you on the phone to post favorably about auto-rx, that is JMO.


You should stop thinking then, because you're wrong. If you have an axe to grind with Auto-RX I don't really care, just don't grind it with me. My results with Auto-RX were favorable, but then, I didn't have engines near in this state. Obviously from some of the posts below this one of yours, something went on with BITOG/ARX...I don't really care.

To me, reading your posts here, it sounds like either you didn't get money refunded back by Auto-RX and/or got into an argument with someone at Auto-RX, and have a chip on your shoulder. Either that, or, you're a paid poster by someone else.

Is this how you want to come across to those frequenting this boards?

Chuck
 
There are a lot of ARX haters here. Nothing new. Everytime somebody wrote a favorable things about ARX, they are always flame as somebody who works for ARX. I think it is uncalled for but the BITOG mods never do nothing. So what can I say????

I have stopped writing too much now. The only thing useful in this board is the Sales section where Tenderloin posted the part store sales for the month.

By the way, ARX never paid me. I always bought mine. Nor that they ever called me to write something for them. I am not affiliated with them whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: unDummy
Chucky2, as long as your not a union Verizon Telecom drone that can't get my bill and service right, I enjoy your opinion. Switching to a telecom's competitor in 4 days. Bye bye Fios, wireless...CAN YOU HERE ME NOW VERIZON?


Haha, no, I'm one of their competitors, and a "manager" in IT. If Verizon is anything like my company, and has a thousand or two IT systems cobbled together, it might be IT 'gremlins' that are causing at least some of your problems. Sucks you have to get rid of your FIOS, personally, I think that's the way all the wired carriers should go - I salaute Verizon for at least going the short term hard/long term awesome route.

Quote:
I'm definitely not one of the pro AutoRX guys here. I've had some of my posts edited/deleted years ago during the original arx/bitog relationship.


I guess I missed those days, shortly, what happened?


Quote:
But, I would like the OP to run the 14k course that was recommended to him by Autorx.
If you can't tell, its going to be difficult since his engine eats 'GALLONS' of oil. I myself would enjoy seeing another arx failure here. If he can't run the 14k regimen, then I won't be able to negatively reference this thread for those pushing it.
If he doesn't follow the 14k regimen, the OP might not be able to push for a refund.


Yeah, I can see he's eating the oil...no really good options here I doubt. If these engines get so sludged as to have to chip oil deposits out, then to me, I don't care what one pours in there, nothing short of a mechanical cleaning first, followed by a chemical cleaning(s) second, is likely going to ever really get the engine clean. If the pan and valve covers could be dropped and a visual inspection done to see just how bad it is inside, and then use mechanical cleaning from there, could be done, that seems ideal. I remember a post on the Auto-RX website where this guy got this truck back from his daughter, ran fine apperantly. He puts Auto-RX in it to clean it out, and it starts smoking, running like s h 1 t, etc. So in the end he goes to his mechanic buddies place, and they drop the pan. The entire thing was a complete sludge/goo fest, it was a disaster. Yet, this thing ran fine before the Auto-RX. Now, clearly, Auto-RX didn't cause all that sludge/goo...it was there all along. But had the guy not dropped his pan and continued to run the Auto-RX, just think of all the s h 1 t that would have been disolved/dislodged.

I think personally from having been on the Auto-RX forums a few times, and their website, is that there is either too much belief in the product, and/or, too much variability. All that results in bad situations like this, where it's billed to fix something like this, but, it's never going to - the situation is too far gone. I've personally read some posts - by the Auto-RX folks - over the years that left me shaking my head as a Project Manager. The language used is not what I'd pick on a call at work...the words and manner used don't either accurately cover the options and variables (thereby leaving the customer confused and/or having an overconfidence in the product, only to be let down later in many situations), or, are too blunt that don't leave any room for the acceptance of results other than perfect. "Auto-RX works if you work it", is a prime example. It's a great marketing term. For those that understand how Auto-RX chemically works, it makes sense. However most who are using it don't really understand that, and saying that to someone - who's often in a F'd situation anyways with their engine - who isn't getting the results they want to see, is just going to p1ss them off. Then you heap on a situation like I described above, where the first thing that should have been done is a mechanical cleanout, and it's a recipe for disaster as far as results and consumer confidence goes. Personally, I think Auto-RX should just change to indicate ring and light-medium safe sludge cleaning, and indicate that if major sludging is present, a mechanical cleaning should be performed prior to the running of Auto-RX. I think they'd save themselves a lot of angst against their product that way (and this is all going by what I remember before I stopped coming here...I can see that attitude has caught up to them).

Quote:
At this point, the OP has some hard decisions to make. I say stick with the 14k regimen an pick up 5 gallon pails of oil from the local truck stop.


I would too...I'd just use the thinnest conventional oil though. I still think from a flow perspective, any edge he can get in getting the oil to flow to where it needs to, at the expense of HTHS and viscosity (where allowed by the manufacturer for his current and future outside temp range), is going to help to whatever degree it can help.

Sorry for the long winded reply!
smile.gif


Chuck
 
Originally Posted By: JMJNet
There are a lot of ARX haters here. Nothing new. Everytime somebody wrote a favorable things about ARX, they are always flame as somebody who works for ARX. I think it is uncalled for but the BITOG mods never do nothing. So what can I say????

I have stopped writing too much now. The only thing useful in this board is the Sales section where Tenderloin posted the part store sales for the month.

By the way, ARX never paid me. I always bought mine. Nor that they ever called me to write something for them. I am not affiliated with them whatsoever.


You bring up some valid points. Truth is there was a time when anyone who mentioned anything other than A-Rx for cleaning an engine got attacked too. I guess there are people who have a hard time forgetting that, along with some of the other things that went down.


People should use whatever they like to clean an engine. Then post their results, good or bad, and that info should be here to help others make informed decisions. Attacking any product does no one any good.
 
Originally Posted By: chucky2
Originally Posted By: PontiacFan
Originally Posted By: chucky2
I guess I forgot to add:

I'm not affiliated with Auto-RX, or anyone even remotely related with any aspect of the petroleum industry, in any way - I work in Telecomm.

Does that answer your question?

Because, I really don't know what you were trying to ask...

Chuck


I think someone from auto-rx either e-mailed you or maybe called you on the phone to post favorably about auto-rx, that is JMO.


You should stop thinking then, because you're wrong. If you have an axe to grind with Auto-RX I don't really care, just don't grind it with me. My results with Auto-RX were favorable, but then, I didn't have engines near in this state. Obviously from some of the posts below this one of yours, something went on with BITOG/ARX...I don't really care.

To me, reading your posts here, it sounds like either you didn't get money refunded back by Auto-RX and/or got into an argument with someone at Auto-RX, and have a chip on your shoulder. Either that, or, you're a paid poster by someone else.

Is this how you want to come across to those frequenting this boards?

Chuck



ill post all day about pennzoil ultra if they will just send a few free cases!!!! will work for ultra
grin.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
I would find a small independent and remove the pan and valve covers to clean this engine out.
This engine sounds to me like its way beyond help that ANY additive may be able to correct.

IMO Its time to take a different avenue before more damage is done.



probably the most sane post in the thread
 
I don't think downtime is an option. Not everyone can simply afford to sink a grand or two in fixing a problem on a new to them vehicle purchase. Finding a competent shop in itself is too difficult these days. A couple hundred dollars on top off oil a year is no big deal. As long as he keeps oil topped off, there will be NO more damage. Its done already.
 
Originally Posted By: electrolover
ill post all day about pennzoil ultra if they will just send a few free cases!!!! will work for ultra
grin.gif



Haha, I see the BITOG obsessions haven't changed much since I've been gone...
laugh.gif


Chuck
 
I'd agree that the best advice in this thread, if the time and money can be spared, is to drop the oil pan, clean everything, take the valve covers off, clean everything, run a really short rinse to make sure everything runs and doesn't leak, and then, run a cleaner of your choice. I think in this case, Auto-RX should have no problem doing what it does best - this Kreen I'm reading about sounds promising as well, however, I'd like to see some used oil analysis from vehicles that have recent past good used oil analysis and similiar use so as to see what affect Kreen has on the engine.

If one does not have the time and/or money, this is where "the best" arguments always come up...
smile.gif


Chuck
 
i have never done a v6 camry but i have done a nissan 2.0 and a kia 4 cylinder and had them back together same day. i dont know how long it would take to clean out a fwd v6. it would probably be a pain.

even after its clean there is no guaranty the consumption will go down
 
I question the value of a used oil analysis in an application like this.
It is claimed that Redline oil show some high metals when first used because its doing some cleaning.
This makes sense as the sludge or deposits may contain some wear metals that have been suspended.

So we have an engine with no possibly no prior used oil analysis to use as a baseline and wear metals maybe from years ago all of sudden being released into the oil.
I don't think they can say X PPM is old and X PPM is new.

I would think the used oil analysis would probably be pretty bad.
Its just a thought and i maybe way off base but the theory sound right.

Thoughts?
 
I agree Trav, UOA reports can leave a lot to the imagination, and be the start of some heated debate. It's a shame they can't detect sludge either, that would certainly add a lot of value to them IMO.
 
I agree, on a vehicle like this, a used oil analysis would only indicate what's going on, nothing more, due to its condition.

What I was talking about was someone with an engine that's had maybe a couple of back to back used oil analysis, say using the same oil, and the used oil analysis are looking basically the same. Then, using the same oil and driving habits and usage, do the Kreen cycle. Take a used oil analysis and send that in. Then, after the Kreen cycle, do another used oil analysis or two and see what those results are.

Did the wear metals stay the same through all of them? What was the trending?

That's what I'm talking about...

Chuck
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom