J Jim Allen Joined Aug 12, 2005 Messages 4,563 Location NW Ohio Jan 9, 2006 #1 Remember the old Type F? I am trying to remember how it was different than other ATFs of "The Day." Was it thinner or thicker? Did it have extra additives or fewer than other ATFs?
Remember the old Type F? I am trying to remember how it was different than other ATFs of "The Day." Was it thinner or thicker? Did it have extra additives or fewer than other ATFs?
R Ray H Joined Jan 16, 2003 Messages 4,478 Location Southern California Jan 9, 2006 #2 No friction modifiers - which is why using Type F was so popular with GM and Mopar drivers who wanted a "crisp" shifting transmission.
No friction modifiers - which is why using Type F was so popular with GM and Mopar drivers who wanted a "crisp" shifting transmission.
MolaKule Staff member Joined Jun 5, 2002 Messages 25,203 Location Iowegia - USA Jan 9, 2006 #3 Like Ray H inferred, it had fewer additives because it did not include friction modifiers. The viscosity of the fluid was the same as today's fluids (except for Ford SPII) in that it was 7.3 to 8.5 cSt.
Like Ray H inferred, it had fewer additives because it did not include friction modifiers. The viscosity of the fluid was the same as today's fluids (except for Ford SPII) in that it was 7.3 to 8.5 cSt.