Astro Van or 2nd Gen Kia Sedona?

Joined
Sep 8, 2023
Messages
59
I'm searching for a new rig for Vanlife. The Chrysler T&C that I purchased has a bad transmission. I'm still able to start the motor to get the car interior warm, but I'm weary of fuel dilution.

I've been looking at Astro Vans because of the 4.3 reliability, and simplicity of DIY repairs.

The 2nd gen Kia Sedona 2005-2014 is also in my radar due to how inexpensive they are on FB market. The 3.8 appears to be very reliabile with some reaching past 250k miles.

I'm fortunate that a gas station is a 5 minute walk. I've been refilling using a funnel.
 
Myself, I would choose the Astro van. It is closer and built like a truck van , if that's what your intended purpose is.
 
If you're trying to remain inconspicuous the Kia gives off fewer creepy vibes.

I'm somewhat of a knuckle dragger and prefer the Astro-- its repairs will be better documented on forums and youtube and the parts are available everywhere.
 
I'm searching for a new rig for Vanlife. The Chrysler T&C that I purchased has a bad transmission. I'm still able to start the motor to get the car interior warm, but I'm weary of fuel dilution.

I've been looking at Astro Vans because of the 4.3 reliability, and simplicity of DIY repairs.

The 2nd gen Kia Sedona 2005-2014 is also in my radar due to how inexpensive they are on FB market. The 3.8 appears to be very reliabile with some reaching past 250k miles.

I'm fortunate that a gas station is a 5 minute walk. I've been refilling using a funnel.
The astro/gmc safari are body on frame trucks. My only concern is that aren't parts getting a little difficult to come by? They haven't been sold new for what 20 years?
 
Weren't the rear axle a/o diffs bad in some Astros?
I recall a coworker with a weekend "street fair business" being stung by that.
Are you saying you live in your van?
 
KIA the Astro is a piece of overrated garbage had one made when GM was hanging by a thread
Seen many Astros make 300K easily, both with the 4.3 and the 2.8-the Sedona is a giant POS by comparison! GM actually built MORE reliable vehicles in the late ‘80s & early ‘90s when the Astro was first released. As compared to all those “awesome” Ventures & Uplanders, etc. they built later…
 
I agree the Astro is likely better suited for this task, but can you find a decent one at this point. Most here were gutted and used by contractors 10 years ago. I almost never see one.

What is your budget? High mileage Honda vans seem to be pretty affordable here. They would likely need a timing belt but not too much else.
 
Myself, I would choose the Astro van. It is closer and built like a truck van , if that's what your intended purpose is.
That and I occasionally see those raised roof camper models that are already somewhat set up for van life.
 
Weren't the rear axle a/o diffs bad in some Astros?
I recall a coworker with a weekend "street fair business" being stung by that.
Are you saying you live in your van?
That was their weak point. It was a 7.5" rear axle. The shop I worked at saw a few failures on them because we worked on a lot of fleet Astros that were way overloaded with tools.
 
Seen many Astros make 300K easily, both with the 4.3 and the 2.8-the Sedona is a giant POS by comparison! GM actually built MORE reliable vehicles in the late ‘80s & early ‘90s when the Astro was first released. As compared to all those “awesome” Ventures & Uplanders, etc. they built later…
I seen plenty of Astros in fleet use because nobody else would buy them a complete piece of overrated garbage
 
Back
Top Bottom