Apple employees impersonating police officers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
895
Location
Midwest
Oh Apple. How do I love you. Let me count the ways. Patent litigation war. Photoshopping pics of Samsung's Galaxy Tab in EU court filings to make it appear the same in aspect ratio/size and user interface as the iPad2.

And now impersonation of police officers. You lovable, hugable, innocents you. Please continue to turn out the latest shiny consumer gadgets for me to drool over while I ignore your chicanery.

thumbsup2.gif
01.gif


http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/09/iphone_5_apple_police.php

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/09/lost_iphone_5_apple.php

Interesting snippets from both articles below:

Quote:

The bizarre saga involving a lost prototype of the iPhone 5 has taken another interesting turn. Contradicting past statements that no records exist of police involvement in the search for the lost prototype, San Francisco Police Department spokesman Lt. Troy Dangerfield now tells SF Weekly that "three or four" SFPD officers accompanied two Apple security officials in an unusual search of a Bernal Heights man's home.

In an interview with SF Weekly last night, Calderón told us that six badge-wearing visitors came to his home in July to inquire about the phone. Calderón said none of them acknowledged being employed by Apple, and one of them offered him $300, and a promise that the owner of the phone would not press charges, if he would return the device.

The visitors also allegedly threatened him and his family, asking questions about their immigration status. "One of the officers is like, 'Is everyone in this house an American citizen?' They said we were all going to get into trouble," Calderón said.

One of the officers left a phone number with him, which SF Weekly traced to Anthony Colon, an investigator employed at Apple, who declined to comment when we reached him.

However, [Calderon] said he was under the impression that they were all police, since they were part of the group outside that identified themselves as SFPD officials. The two who entered the house did not disclose that they were private security officers, according to Calderón.

"When they came to my house, they said they were SFPD," Calderón said. "I thought they were SFPD. That's why I let them in." He said he would not have permitted the search if he had been aware the two people conducting it were not actually police officers.

At the least, the incident is sure to raise questions about the propriety of multiple SFPD officers helping private detectives conduct a search -- which was never properly recorded, per standard police operating procedure -- of somebody's home.

It is also unclear why records of SFPD officers' involvement did not emerge until now. Yesterday SFPD spokesman Officer Albie Esparza said that "we don't have any record of such an investigation going on at this point."
 
Just so you know, there were two actual police officers involved in the search. So Apple employees did not impersonate police officers.
 
Did they have a warrant or not? If they had a warrant and two government police officers there to rule the roost, I dont see an issue.

If they didnt have a warrant, then there may be an issue, though apparently SFPD was there.

If they didnt have a warrant and let anyone in, it was THEIR choice. Ask to see badges, selectively let people in, whatever. It is on them. As soon as they let the person cross the threshold into the house, I dont know what they expect.

I do have an issue with apple security folks stepping foot in. If they got a warrant, had SFPD tear the place inside-out, I dnt really have an issue. As soon as they were no SFPD, Im not keen on the situation, but still think that the homeowner should have prevented their entry (and checked ID), not just complained after.
 
Originally Posted By: NewC6
Just so you know, there were two actual police officers involved in the search. So Apple employees did not impersonate police officers.


did you read the article?
4 of the 6 people were police officers
the 2 that searched the home were apple employees.
 
Originally Posted By: Rand
Originally Posted By: NewC6
Just so you know, there were two actual police officers involved in the search. So Apple employees did not impersonate police officers.


did you read the article?
4 of the 6 people were police officers
the 2 that searched the home were apple employees.


Is that illegal? Seriously, I dont know... If a warrant is issued and the person lets them in without requesting ID, is there an issue?
 
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: Rand
Originally Posted By: NewC6
Just so you know, there were two actual police officers involved in the search. So Apple employees did not impersonate police officers.


did you read the article?
4 of the 6 people were police officers
the 2 that searched the home were apple employees.


Is that illegal? Seriously, I dont know... If a warrant is issued and the person lets them in without requesting ID, is there an issue?

Its illegal if they misrepresented themselves as cops. Regardless of whether the guy should have let cops search his home without a warrant (I wouldn't - though considering that he presumably did not have the phone and that the men were threatening to get INS involved I can understand why he did) at issue is him being cooperative in what is presumably a police investigation and then two men who are not police officers searching his home after being part of a 6 person team that showed up at this mans home identifying themselves as police.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom