I was pondering this since I have some 4967 sized filters. Would it hurt anything to run a 4967 on the 02’ Dakota or my 11’ Focus?
1) The ISO standard seemingly uses whatever test flow rate the filter OEM asks them to use. How do you know one filter maker isn't using a wildly different flow rate than another for the same nominal filter? What if one OEM for a typical Honda spin-on says to use 3L/min and another says to use 5L/min? The test duration and injection rate are all scaled to these nominal flows which are not controlled by the standard. By my reading, there's nothing in the standard the precludes a filter manufacturer from sandbagging the test by using a lower nominal flow rate, because face velocity (flow...
The 6607 is basically a shortened 7317.....you won't have a problem. What vehicle are you running the 6607 on?I've run 6007s in place of 7317 just because I got a bunch of them for very little money.
Yup, same here.I believe in running the largest, most efficient filter that works for your applications. There is a downside to using a smaller filter.
1) The ISO standard seemingly uses whatever test flow rate the filter OEM asks them to use. How do you know one filter maker isn't using a wildly different flow rate than another for the same nominal filter? What if one OEM for a typical Honda spin-on says to use 3L/min and another says to use 5L/min? The test duration and injection rate are all scaled to these nominal flows which are not controlled by the standard. By my reading, there's nothing in the standard the precludes a filter manufacturer from sandbagging the test by using a lower nominal flow rate, because face velocity (flow...
I ran them on a 2010 Accord and a 2016 HRV.The 6607 is basically a shortened 7317.....you won't have a problem. What vehicle are you running the 6607 on?
I've used the aforementioned 6607 and a shorty version of the EcoGard. I can't remember the number. I got a bunch of the 6607 during a Walmart clearance.For Hondas, I started using the Premium Guard PG4612EX, which is shorter than the Honda, aka 7317, filter.
The 6607 and/or 7712 is a disgrace to the M20x1.5 crowd.I believe in running the largest, most efficient filter that works for your applications. There is a downside to using a smaller filter.
1) The ISO standard seemingly uses whatever test flow rate the filter OEM asks them to use. How do you know one filter maker isn't using a wildly different flow rate than another for the same nominal filter? What if one OEM for a typical Honda spin-on says to use 3L/min and another says to use 5L/min? The test duration and injection rate are all scaled to these nominal flows which are not controlled by the standard. By my reading, there's nothing in the standard the precludes a filter manufacturer from sandbagging the test by using a lower nominal flow rate, because face velocity (flow...
There is a YouTube video on the Taryl Fixes All channel of someone that ruined a Kohler engine on a zero turn that used a smaller oil filter meant for a different Kohler engine. Worth a watch if anyone can find it.