Any comments on the Hyundai Elantra??

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
326
Location
california
As of now, it looks like the replacement vehicle for my wife's contour will be a Elantra.

Local dealership still has some of the 2010 in stocks, which is pretty much the same as the 2011 except for a little higher MPG, less weight, a slight design change.

Comments on this vehicle and what about 2010 vs 2011? Of course I can save a few thousand going 2010, but are teh modifications to the 2011 worth it?
 
Why this? First of all, it is american made. I won't buy a ford this time around because they did not stand behind their dash recall. Chevy and Dodge doesn't have anything I like. Kia looks and feel cheap. Maybe Honda, but Hyundai looks to be a lower cost version of the Honda.
 
It's a nice car. I have a few friends with 2010s and they like them. The 2011 gets better MPGs.
The dealer should take $ 4 to $5K off sticker on a 2010.
 
The 2010 has a timing belt. Get the 2011 if you can afford it. The gas savings(extra 3-6mpg) and the saving from not having to pay for the installation of new timing belt will probably pay for the difference.
 
The '11 is new from pretty much the ground up. It would be well worth a few thousand more. Read the reviews on both. A Forte is also nice. If you like more power, the Forte SX will deliver. I'd pick both Elantra and Forte over current Civic.
 
If I didn't have my Corolla and I was looking to buy today, now that I have heard the 2011s have a timing chain...the Elantra wold get my money. Top of the class MPG's, great looks, and plenty of power are all big items to convince. Hyundai is really stepping up their game.
 
Last edited:
Get the 2011. It's a totally new car.

Having changed a timing belt on an old Elantra, not dealing with one is fantastic!
 
I would at least drive an '11 model to see what they're like, vs. the 2010 model. It would also all depend on how much they'll close the 2010s out for, to figure out if it'd be worth it to buy one instead of an '11 model. Previous posts are good advice, regarding the timing chain vs. belt and the improved fuel economy.
 
If I were you, I'd wait until the bugs are fixed.

Think about it: Brand new Chassis, brand new engine, brand new design, and brand new tooling since they're moving production to America.

I remember the The first-year American Sonata's had timing belt and brake issues.
 
Originally Posted By: Popinski
If I were you, I'd wait until the bugs are fixed.

Think about it: Brand new Chassis, brand new engine, brand new design, and brand new tooling since they're moving production to America.

I remember the The first-year American Sonata's had timing belt and brake issues.


They did, I only ask because being involved with all the maintenance with my MIL's '06 it had no issues whatsoever. It was a good A-B car for a family, nothing more, nothing less.
 
The comment about the timing belt and chain is a real good comment. I think if I can't get them to lower the price of the 2010 by acouple thousand, without including incentives, 2011 might be a good option.

Regard the comment about waiting, yes, first year of new models do have them problems, which is something to consider, but Hyundai has been proving themselves to stand behind their produc.
 
Originally Posted By: kkreit01
The '11 is new from pretty much the ground up. It would be well worth a few thousand more. Read the reviews on both. A Forte is also nice. If you like more power, the Forte SX will deliver. I'd pick both Elantra and Forte over current Civic.


+1
 
powayroger,

There is no question that Hyundai has come a long way and with each model change, they get even better. It would be hard to say if the '10 would be a better "buy" than an '11. If the '11 Elantra and the Kia Forte' are on the same chassis, then the bugs should have been worked out in the Forte' first before using the chassis/drivetrain etc. in the Elantra, which may have been Hyundai's whole idea.

I think that Hyundai, as all car company's, have worked out most of the bugs in their vehicles prior to putting them on the market. It's called FMEA!

If I am going to buy a new vehicle, I really like buying a vehicle during it's 3rd model year on the market and even that doesn't gaurantee anything. The first two model years on the market is really the introduction of the vehilce or redesign. On the 3rd model year, the company has made modifications and updates while keeping all of the good things intact. In the case of the new redesigned 2011 Elantra, - 2013 might be a better year to buy or trade up.

It's a tough choice between the model years. Buying a 2010 in 2011, you have to take a depreciation hit anyway but, it may be worst, IDK! There is much homework still needed to be done here trying to figure out the depreciation and MPG differences(gains/losses) between the '10 & '11 models.

Look into insurance costs as well, between the two model years. This alone could help in your decision making. Also, look at cost of ownership over time. Which will cost more to own over a 3-5 or 5-7 year period of time. First, initial cost and then insurance, regular maintenance, fuel(MPG), depreciation etc.

Good Luck and keep us posted!

CB
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: powayroger


Regard the comment about waiting, yes, first year of new models do have them problems, which is something to consider, but Hyundai has been proving themselves to stand behind their produc.

If their dealers do not stand behind the product, we cannot say Hyundai does either. There are at least four 'bugs' in our 2009 Sonata one of which is serious and the rest annoying daily (and 2009 was only a refresh of the NF Sonata) but the dealer brushes them off. Hyundai never sent us a satisfaction survey as the dealer said they would.
 
Originally Posted By: BearZDefect
Originally Posted By: powayroger


Regard the comment about waiting, yes, first year of new models do have them problems, which is something to consider, but Hyundai has been proving themselves to stand behind their produc.

If their dealers do not stand behind the product, we cannot say Hyundai does either. There are at least four 'bugs' in our 2009 Sonata one of which is serious and the rest annoying daily (and 2009 was only a refresh of the NF Sonata) but the dealer brushes them off. Hyundai never sent us a satisfaction survey as the dealer said they would.


This is a shame!
 
Last edited:
Being a 2007 Hyundai Elantra( same as a 2010) owner I think I can give you some real world feed back.

Overall in the 93K miles I have owned it, it has been a dependable and fun vehicle to own. It does have a lot of features for the money Personally though, I'm not sure if i'd purchase another for a few resons.

1.) resale value is [censored]. If you do purchase one, plan on keeping it for a long time as they depriciate fast.
2.) The suspension setup causes it to eat tires. The last two sets of tires have worn out prematurely on the inside edge. I have had the suspension checked by both the dealer and an independant shop and it's just the design, it's not adjustable enough to correct.
3.) It felt really old when it got to about 70K miles. I have maintained it to the severe schedule including trans services every 30 K, oil changes every 4K, air filters at 15K and plugs at 60K with the timing belt. Even after all this, The trans flairs shifts from 2-3 pretty bad and the engine has a pronounced "tick/knock" that it didn't have at lower mileage especially when cold. I don't have faith that the trans or engine wil make it past 125-135K or so without letting go... So here is a list of all the stuff I have had to do to it over the past 93K.

- all 4 swaybar links, actually 2 sets in the drivers front.They start to knock pretty bad when they go.
- set of headlight bulbs
- passenger side door speaker (blown)
- Just needed front pads and rotors at 92K, pretty good.
- Idle air control valve
- something still hisses on heavy acceleration, dealer can't figure it out. I've also done some troubleshooting and can't find it. It's only when moving under load.

As you can see, yes it has been fairly reliable meaning it's never left me stranded but, I don't beleive they are built to last like some other foreign auto makers. I'd highly reccomend driving a higher mileage one to see how they age. It's not a terrible car as it has served me well however, for how much effort and money I have put into maintaning it, I feel like it should of aged more gracefully or felt fresher longer. I came from Honda so maybe thats my issue... Really drive the compitition, lots to choose from.
 
The 2011 would be our choice . We've seen discounts as high as $1,800 for the '11s . Very impressive lookin' car , inside and out
20.gif
. Agree , the timing chain and the longer maintenance be better . Big hit on the 2010 too . Haven't had the chance to test drive one . Plan to .
35.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Huie83
Being a 2007 Hyundai Elantra( same as a 2010) owner I think I can give you some real world feed back.

Overall in the 93K miles I have owned it, it has been a dependable and fun vehicle to own. It does have a lot of features for the money Personally though, I'm not sure if i'd purchase another for a few resons.

1.) resale value is [censored]. If you do purchase one, plan on keeping it for a long time as they depriciate fast.
2.) The suspension setup causes it to eat tires. The last two sets of tires have worn out prematurely on the inside edge. I have had the suspension checked by both the dealer and an independant shop and it's just the design, it's not adjustable enough to correct.
3.) It felt really old when it got to about 70K miles. I have maintained it to the severe schedule including trans services every 30 K, oil changes every 4K, air filters at 15K and plugs at 60K with the timing belt. Even after all this, The trans flairs shifts from 2-3 pretty bad and the engine has a pronounced "tick/knock" that it didn't have at lower mileage especially when cold. I don't have faith that the trans or engine wil make it past 125-135K or so without letting go... So here is a list of all the stuff I have had to do to it over the past 93K.

- all 4 swaybar links, actually 2 sets in the drivers front.They start to knock pretty bad when they go.
- set of headlight bulbs
- passenger side door speaker (blown)
- Just needed front pads and rotors at 92K, pretty good.
- Idle air control valve
- something still hisses on heavy acceleration, dealer can't figure it out. I've also done some troubleshooting and can't find it. It's only when moving under load.

As you can see, yes it has been fairly reliable meaning it's never left me stranded but, I don't beleive they are built to last like some other foreign auto makers. I'd highly reccomend driving a higher mileage one to see how they age. It's not a terrible car as it has served me well however, for how much effort and money I have put into maintaning it, I feel like it should of aged more gracefully or felt fresher longer. I came from Honda so maybe thats my issue... Really drive the compitition, lots to choose from.






Hmmm First model year Hyundai(2007). Also, 2007's had problematic suspension components.
 
Originally Posted By: kkreit01
The '11 is new from pretty much the ground up. It would be well worth a few thousand more. Read the reviews on both. A Forte is also nice. If you like more power, the Forte SX will deliver. I'd pick both Elantra and Forte over current Civic.


I could see an '11 Elantra over a Civic, but a Forte? No way...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom