Thinking useing cast hm 10w30.
Yes there was. It just wasn't generally available. GM was already asking the EPA for permission to use it in 1984 for Emission and Fuel Economy Data Vehicles.quote:
Originally posted by GoldenRod:
I would disagree, since there was no such thing as a 5W-30 back in 1984, I would advise against it.
1984 Camaro's didn't come with 350's. There were two choices of 305's. The 350 didn't appear in the 3rd gen Camaro until 1987 w/225 HP.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
Well I think it's the original engine. It may be a 350, haven't checked the numbers on the block.
That's true but it's not hard to swap in a 350 and could have already been done. Previous owner knows very little about the car.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
1984 Camaro's didn't come with 350's. There were two choices of 305's. The 350 didn't appear in the 3rd gen Camaro until 1987 w/225 HP.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
Well I think it's the original engine. It may be a 350, haven't checked the numbers on the block.
Considering against it, the car is a T-top car.quote:
Originally posted by Scott P:
I remember runing 20W-50 in my 305 Monte when the rings were going out.![]()
I'd go with Dino 10W-30. Snce uop are changing out the engine, I don't think you need to go too crazy.
Well, in your first post, you said that you thought it was the original engine and that it may be a 350. If it is original, then it's not.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
That's true but it's not hard to swap in a 350 and could have already been done. Previous owner knows very little about the car.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
1984 Camaro's didn't come with 350's. There were two choices of 305's. The 350 didn't appear in the 3rd gen Camaro until 1987 w/225 HP.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
Well I think it's the original engine. It may be a 350, haven't checked the numbers on the block.
I can put a 350 in a Cheverlet Chevet, didn't come with it but can be done![]()
My brother has a 1986 and a 1987. I believe the only difference between the fuel systems for the 305 and 350 are the injectors. That would make a 350 swap even easier (my bro swapped a 350 in his '86). Good luck.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
Well, in your first post, you said that you thought it was the original engine and that it may be a 350. If it is original, then it's not.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
That's true but it's not hard to swap in a 350 and could have already been done. Previous owner knows very little about the car.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
1984 Camaro's didn't come with 350's. There were two choices of 305's. The 350 didn't appear in the 3rd gen Camaro until 1987 w/225 HP.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
Well I think it's the original engine. It may be a 350, haven't checked the numbers on the block.
I can put a 350 in a Cheverlet Chevet, didn't come with it but can be done![]()
In 1987, the 350 Z28 had 225HP compared to the 190HP 305 HO. 35HP is not enough to flex a t-top car to bend it. Otherwise, they would never had installed the 350 in the first place.
Read a little slower man, i'm not trying to be a prick but I did put a period after when I said I think it may be the original (.) "this is when the next thought began" I also thought it could possibly be a 350, as hard as it pulls, it has the larger balancer "which doesn't mean much", and other things have been changed.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
Well, in your first post, you said that you thought it was the original engine and that it may be a 350. If it is original, then it's not.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
That's true but it's not hard to swap in a 350 and could have already been done. Previous owner knows very little about the car.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
1984 Camaro's didn't come with 350's. There were two choices of 305's. The 350 didn't appear in the 3rd gen Camaro until 1987 w/225 HP.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
Well I think it's the original engine. It may be a 350, haven't checked the numbers on the block.
I can put a 350 in a Cheverlet Chevet, didn't come with it but can be done![]()
In 1987, the 350 Z28 had 225HP compared to the 190HP 305 HO. 35HP is not enough to flex a t-top car to bend it. Otherwise, they would never had installed the 350 in the first place.
Mine is carbed, if I stay carbed it won't be difficult either. I don't think they went injected till 86 or so. The earlier ones came with the famouse Q-jet carb.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
My brother has a 1986 and a 1987. I believe the only difference between the fuel systems for the 305 and 350 are the injectors. That would make a 350 swap even easier (my bro swapped a 350 in his '86). Good luck.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
Well, in your first post, you said that you thought it was the original engine and that it may be a 350. If it is original, then it's not.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
That's true but it's not hard to swap in a 350 and could have already been done. Previous owner knows very little about the car.quote:
Originally posted by Zaedock:
1984 Camaro's didn't come with 350's. There were two choices of 305's. The 350 didn't appear in the 3rd gen Camaro until 1987 w/225 HP.quote:
Originally posted by SpunBearing:
Well I think it's the original engine. It may be a 350, haven't checked the numbers on the block.
I can put a 350 in a Cheverlet Chevet, didn't come with it but can be done![]()
In 1987, the 350 Z28 had 225HP compared to the 190HP 305 HO. 35HP is not enough to flex a t-top car to bend it. Otherwise, they would never had installed the 350 in the first place.