Amsoil filter caused engine destruction ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: badnews
When an ammo company puts out a bad batch of ammo

they publish in gun magazines - recall alert



Amsoil did not have a bad batch of filters, or a bad product. So I'm not sure how that analogy fits.
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: roushstage2
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
And if he bought it from Amsoil and not a store then what? Odds of buying it from a parts store are pretty slim. I live on Long Island and don't know of many parts stores that carry Amsoil. In fact I don't think there is a parts store within 20 miles of me that carries it. Then if he bought it from a parts store after the issue there should have been the TSB inside the box. Does Amsoil put the TSB's in boxes? That is a question I'm asking by the way, looking for an answer.

A good law student knows a good lawyer can really work magic. Here we have fragments of a story at best. Again remember the Dream Team?

I see you use Amsoil, so do I, that doesn't change anything for me.
If he bought it from Amsoil, then Amsoil would have to keep track of the exact vehicle that exact person bought it for, and then gather all of that information and send out the TSB. It's something that can't realistically be done is all. Your missing my point I think. The information is publicly available from the source. The consumer bears responsibility as well for knowing about the stuff that they buy. The manufacturer has made the information public.

As for me, there are 3 parts stores I know off of the top of my head nearby that sell Amsoil products. That doesn't mean there aren't more that I don't know about either. :)


There are no parts stores anywhere near where I live that I am aware of that sell Amsoil. Maybe 3000 miles away it's another story. I saw Amsoil in two stores within 2 miles of each other in WA. None here. For the most part Amsoil is sold through dealers, and it is shipped to the buyers. Would it be safe to say that a large portion of their business is done that way, and not through retail stores?

I understand where you are coming from, but Amsoil has to be at fault here, at least to some degree. Otherwise I guess each time we put a part in our car, oil, a filter, spark plugs, etc we better check to see if there are any TSB on them. Because if the part should fail it would be our fault. Even though we didn't make the part, just the fact that we bought it we'd be to blame.

Question, does Amsoil put a TSB inside the box of a filter like the guy who huffed the Toyota engine used? My guess is the filter fits a few applications, a TSB stating if this filter is used in application xxxx please note. Then state the caution, user notes etc. That would be easy enough. Do they at least do that?

It would be safe to say.

I'm not saying Amsoil couldn't/shouldn't be responsible at all. I'm saying that consumers need to take responsibility as well though. Responsibility is shared. If the manufacturer of everything is solely responsible for any problems 100% of the time because no one wants to take responsibility for their actions/choices anymore (an increasing trend, unfortunately), you'll need to have a company lawyer give you a waiver to sign for every single thing you ever purchase from said company. However, I don't believe the issue was with a filter failure; just a problem with that filter on that engine. No?

The paper in the box is a good idea. I'm not in the position to make that choice or analyze the cost/benefit of that whole deal. There's no arguing everyone would know at exactly then if they should use it or not, but I go back to the sharing responsibility. I mean, if you bought oil and a filter, and neither on the jug or filter box it didn't say you had to change your oil every 5,000 miles and your engine failed after 50,000 miles with say, only two oil changes, is it the the oil/filter manufacturer's fault because they didn't explicitly say it had to be changed more often, or send out a notice to every potential user saying so? Sharing responsibility.

As to this:
Quote:
Amsoil or any other manufacture for that matter should never expect any customer to continually check their website every time they use their product to see if there is a problem, TSB or recall on said product.

Recalls are made much, much more publically available, for good reason. If you know the difference between a recall and a TSB, that will make perfect sense.
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Originally Posted By: badnews
When an ammo company puts out a bad batch of ammo

they publish in gun magazines - recall alert



Amsoil did not have a bad batch of filters, or a bad product. So I'm not sure how that analogy fits.


Right
they put out a filter that was labeled for a certain use and then came out with a TSB saying that use was now changed .

Lets not word twist here ......... Amsoil was way wrong on this, it happens . They handled it badly and it would seem they did so to save face and maintain profits .

And that speaks volumes about them to me .


Edit:
even if this destroyed engine is an internet rumor the situation of a filter being put out and the filters range of use being changed occurred - that seems to be a fact.

And I will not put myself in a position to let Amsoil do this to me in the future about anything else they manufacture .
YMMV
 
Last edited:
Actually Amsoil has been quite up front about not recommending the Ea057 in Toyota engines for extended OCI's. If there is a dealer that doesn't know about it, then they must be deaf and blind. I've given the TSB to all my retail accounts. It's been in the dealer emails, it's been in snail mailings. It's currently right up front on the dealer webpage (again).

Please tell me what more they should have done?

I guess if the expectation is that Amsoil run such a thing in all major newspapers and magazines, then they fell short. Sorry.
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
And if he bought it from Amsoil and not a store then what? Odds of buying it from a parts store are pretty slim. I live on Long Island and don't know of many parts stores that carry Amsoil. In fact I don't think there is a parts store within 20 miles of me that carries it.




Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the only way a "store" would have Amsoil on the shelf would be if someone working at that store was an Amsoil dealer...correct??? I have only seen Amsoil on shelves in two stores, and both stores had an Amsoil dealer in-house.

The simple fact is Amsoil cannot be responsible for the end use of their product...whether they recommend a certain use or not. The consumer has to accept some responsibility.

The underlying problem with this whole thread is that an engine failed that was using Amsoil products. Period. We have no proof of which happened, an engine failure causing a plugged filter or a plugged filter causing an engine failure. In the end we still only know one thing...an engine failed that was using Amsoil products. Which means nothing as the engine could have failed running [insert your favorite product here].

I would be questioning the findings of the Technician, since I believe the original post indicated the oil/filter had been in use 5k miles, which is most likely in the factory specified FCI/OCI.

A lot of the discussion of this thread is between those that *want* to see it be a failure of an Amsoil product (anti-Amsoil) and the defense by those that won't believe this could actually happen to an Amsoil product (pro-Amsoil).

Just my thoughts, whether right or wrong.
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Actually Amsoil has been quite up front about not recommending the Ea057 in Toyota engines for extended OCI's. If there is a dealer that doesn't know about it, then they must be deaf and blind. I've given the TSB to all my retail accounts. It's been in the dealer emails, it's been in snail mailings. It's currently right up front on the dealer webpage (again).

Please tell me what more they should have done?

I guess if the expectation is that Amsoil run such a thing in all major newspapers and magazines, then they fell short. Sorry.


I have no motivation in pursuing this further as you obviously do by your avatar.

Peace out
 
Originally Posted By: roushstage2
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: roushstage2
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
And if he bought it from Amsoil and not a store then what? Odds of buying it from a parts store are pretty slim. I live on Long Island and don't know of many parts stores that carry Amsoil. In fact I don't think there is a parts store within 20 miles of me that carries it. Then if he bought it from a parts store after the issue there should have been the TSB inside the box. Does Amsoil put the TSB's in boxes? That is a question I'm asking by the way, looking for an answer.

A good law student knows a good lawyer can really work magic. Here we have fragments of a story at best. Again remember the Dream Team?

I see you use Amsoil, so do I, that doesn't change anything for me.
If he bought it from Amsoil, then Amsoil would have to keep track of the exact vehicle that exact person bought it for, and then gather all of that information and send out the TSB. It's something that can't realistically be done is all. Your missing my point I think. The information is publicly available from the source. The consumer bears responsibility as well for knowing about the stuff that they buy. The manufacturer has made the information public.

As for me, there are 3 parts stores I know off of the top of my head nearby that sell Amsoil products. That doesn't mean there aren't more that I don't know about either. :)


There are no parts stores anywhere near where I live that I am aware of that sell Amsoil. Maybe 3000 miles away it's another story. I saw Amsoil in two stores within 2 miles of each other in WA. None here. For the most part Amsoil is sold through dealers, and it is shipped to the buyers. Would it be safe to say that a large portion of their business is done that way, and not through retail stores?

I understand where you are coming from, but Amsoil has to be at fault here, at least to some degree. Otherwise I guess each time we put a part in our car, oil, a filter, spark plugs, etc we better check to see if there are any TSB on them. Because if the part should fail it would be our fault. Even though we didn't make the part, just the fact that we bought it we'd be to blame.

Question, does Amsoil put a TSB inside the box of a filter like the guy who huffed the Toyota engine used? My guess is the filter fits a few applications, a TSB stating if this filter is used in application xxxx please note. Then state the caution, user notes etc. That would be easy enough. Do they at least do that?

It would be safe to say.

I'm not saying Amsoil couldn't/shouldn't be responsible at all. I'm saying that consumers need to take responsibility as well though. Responsibility is shared. If the manufacturer of everything is solely responsible for any problems 100% of the time because no one wants to take responsibility for their actions/choices anymore (an increasing trend, unfortunately), you'll need to have a company lawyer give you a waiver to sign for every single thing you ever purchase from said company. However, I don't believe the issue was with a filter failure; just a problem with that filter on that engine. No?

The paper in the box is a good idea. I'm not in the position to make that choice or analyze the cost/benefit of that whole deal. There's no arguing everyone would know at exactly then if they should use it or not, but I go back to the sharing responsibility. I mean, if you bought oil and a filter, and neither on the jug or filter box it didn't say you had to change your oil every 5,000 miles and your engine failed after 50,000 miles with say, only two oil changes, is it the the oil/filter manufacturer's fault because they didn't explicitly say it had to be changed more often, or send out a notice to every potential user saying so? Sharing responsibility.

As to this:
Quote:
Amsoil or any other manufacture for that matter should never expect any customer to continually check their website every time they use their product to see if there is a problem, TSB or recall on said product.

Recalls are made much, much more publically available, for good reason. If you know the difference between a recall and a TSB, that will make perfect sense.


I think we are coming a little closer in understanding each other in this thread.
11.gif
I do understand the difference between a TSB and recall, 2 different animals. Still the company has to step up to the plate in situations like this. In the situation of a TSB make it a little easier for the end user. No end user should be expected to be an expert or an authority on products they use. Then constantly have to hunt for possible problems associated with products they use.

If the product was in fact bought from a store, then the stores selling said products should post the TSB if they are selling a product in question. I doubt that is done either, it was a general comment for all mfg's. But then again that would cost a few extra $$ and make life a little easier, so why bother? JMO
 
Originally Posted By: deeter16317

I would be questioning the findings of the Technician, since I believe the original post indicated the oil/filter had been in use 5k miles, which is most likely in the factory specified FCI/OCI.


I think the postings said the filter was on for about 12K miles, not 5K miles. See the 1st post in this thread.
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint

I think we are coming a little closer in understanding each other in this thread.
11.gif
I do understand the difference between a TSB and recall, 2 different animals. Still the company has to step up to the plate in situations like this. In the situation of a TSB make it a little easier for the end user. No end user should be expected to be an expert or an authority on products they use. Then constantly have to hunt for possible problems associated with products they use.

If the product was in fact bought from a store, then the stores selling said products should post the TSB if they are selling a product in question. I doubt that is done either, it was a general comment for all mfg's. But then again that would cost a few extra $$ and make life a little easier, so why bother? JMO
Yes, the company does share some responsibility too IMO. Not saying they don't. I think the question is, did the person file a claim with Amsoil? That's probably where it should start. The consumer taking responsibility to do his part to help himself and notifying Amsoil so they can take their responsible action. It's a 2 way street. Putting a little slip of paper in each EaO57, was it, box is a great idea IMO as well. I think a TSB notice in stores that do sell the product is a great idea as well. I know Wal-Mart posts recalls and such in-store for the products they sell or have recently sold. Yes, it would cost money, but what's going to cost more? People never using your products again or a box of printer paper?
wink.gif
 
Originally Posted By: roushstage2
Originally Posted By: demarpaint

I think we are coming a little closer in understanding each other in this thread.
11.gif
I do understand the difference between a TSB and recall, 2 different animals. Still the company has to step up to the plate in situations like this. In the situation of a TSB make it a little easier for the end user. No end user should be expected to be an expert or an authority on products they use. Then constantly have to hunt for possible problems associated with products they use.

If the product was in fact bought from a store, then the stores selling said products should post the TSB if they are selling a product in question. I doubt that is done either, it was a general comment for all mfg's. But then again that would cost a few extra $$ and make life a little easier, so why bother? JMO
Yes, the company does share some responsibility too IMO. Not saying they don't. I think the question is, did the person file a claim with Amsoil? That's probably where it should start. The consumer taking responsibility to do his part to help himself and notifying Amsoil so they can take their responsible action. It's a 2 way street. Putting a little slip of paper in each EaO57, was it, box is a great idea IMO as well. I think a TSB notice in stores that do sell the product is a great idea as well. I know Wal-Mart posts recalls and such in-store for the products they sell or have recently sold. Yes, it would cost money, but what's going to cost more? People never using your products again or a box of printer paper?
wink.gif




cheers3.gif
10.gif
thumbsup2.gif
 
Bang on demarpaint!!
I just found this site in my research after this very trying time with the newest vehicle I've ever owned,

I have a 2006 Toyota Tacoma with 70 000 miles and a wrecked block/crank with one wrecked connecting rod as a result of a blocked amsoil oil filter. Just finished up installing a new motor. I was previously an amsoil dealer and always a firm believer in it. No more amsoil oil filters for this guy. I've done a complete investigation into this and remember the day this happened last july. After seeing my oil light come on in hot summer traffic I stopped. Proceeded to check it out and decided to change the oil filter and pcv valve. As soon as I changed the filter the oil light went off but still made some noise. Tore the engine down to find 1 spun bearing(#6) and # 5 was about to spin. # 6 Connecting rod journal was chewed. I bought the filter and premium oil, having complete faith in Amsoil to have the best stuff. Also, I of all people know about amsoil being a former dealer and customer with a few years of operation in business. I have a complete photo package as well as detailed report of the whole affair.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom