Amsoil 20w-50(TRO) in 1990 Audi 100

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 2, 2002
Messages
5,784
Location
Dixie
Miles on engine--145,000
Miles on oil---12,000
(No makeup oil added)
Air Filter--- Amsoil oiled foam
Oil Filter---Amsoil SDF-15 (not changed)

water 0.1%
fuel Viscosity @ 100C--20.5 Cst

oxidation--36.7%
nitration--74%
TBN--8.2

Wear Metals

Fe--20
Cr---1
Pb---7
Cu--15
Sn---0
Al---6
Ni---0
Ag---0
Silicon---5

Additive Chemistry

Mg--365
Ca--3020

P---978
Zn--1280

This engine always seems to produce high nitration, but other than that runs pretty well.

TooSlick
 
what type of engine,

How many qt's does this engine use, including this oversized filter?

what type of driving, stop/go, otr, heavy foot fast driver, normal not in a hurry type driving,

@12k miles and no makeup oil, I sumize it isn't a heavy foot, nor heavy loaded, just normal driving.

during what time of the year? season.
All year I assume?

[ August 04, 2002, 11:05 AM: Message edited by: BOBISTHEOILGUY ]
 
Sorry patman,

here is a little something on that.

Nitration products are formed by the reaction of the products of combustion with lubricating film in the fuel combustion areas. These are highly acidic and attack metal parts. Nitration products also rapidly accelerate oil oxidation.
 
So let me see if I understand this better. A higher percentage of nitration basically means there
are more acids in the oil?
 
One thing I have wondered, what exactly is nitration? And when you get a high percentage, what does that mean is going on inside the engine? It's something to do with engine cleanliness right? I poked around on the main page here earlier this week and didn't find any info on this, even in the oil analysis part.
 
Bob,

Engine is the 2.3L, 5 cylinder gas motor that Audi/VW used for a number of years. It is basically a VW four cylinder with an extra cylinder grafted on. Oil capacity is approx 5.0 qts. Driving was 30% city/70% highway ...I actually drive this car pretty hard, since it is underpowered (130 hp in a 3300 lb vehicle) and runs high revs - about 3000 rpms @ 65 mph with a three speed auto transmission.

I have had very good success controlling oil consumption with the 20w-50 synthetic Racing Oil in high mileage engines. Noack volatility is very low, about 5%, so you don't expect much oil use.

TooSlick
 
I don't think I'd be too quick to contribute the lower oil consumption to noack but more to viscosity. It appears the reason for the 20w50 so to reduce the shearing blowby around the rings which is exactly what I'd do if I was experiencing any myself.

The higher noack seldom makes that much difference as most oils will seldom reach those kind of temps for any period of time. Now back when the base oils had a lower noack # that was closer to the engine temps reached, yes, having such a lower noack would have been a real concern with such a situation.

I see your wear #'s are not bad and I think that is because you do use a higher viscosity which will produce a better hydrodynamic film and of course amsoil does keep a higher level of barrier additives like some of the other specialty oils. What I find interesting is tbn of 8.2 ., If this was truly a race oil, Why would they have such a high # because most race oils would be designed for racing applications which requires very little detergents since they are pulling the oil out frequently. Schaeffers for example, starts with a 5.5 are right around there. So to run such an oil for 12k and still maintain such high tbn is interesting especially for a race oil.

Is the oxidation/nitration #'s on a 100% or 200%scale with this company?
 
For some strange reason a lot of race oils lately seem to have a lot more detergents than you'd think. Royal Purple's race oils for instance, have a TBN of 10.
 
Bob,

They label this a racing oil, but it's also formulated for extended drain use in street applications. You are simply wrong about the Noack volatility - it corrolates very well with oil consumption in actual use. Even though the sump temps may not be close to the flash point, there are areas of the engine, like the upper cylinder walls and valvetrain, where the oil is locally heated to a very high temp. I've run the same batch of Amsoil for 15,000 miles without adding any oil - you would be hard pressed to do this with a petroleum based product having a significantlyhigher volatility.

TooSlick
 
quote:

Originally posted by Ted Kublin:
Bob,

You are simply wrong about the Noack volatility - it corrolates very well with oil consumption in actual use. Even though the sump temps may not be close to the flash point, there are areas of the engine, like the upper cylinder walls and valvetrain, where the oil is locally heated to a very high temp.

TooSlick


I think you're falling into the same trap as many I see Ted. Let's look at this in a couple of ways and maybe you'll understand how you are not seeing the whole picture on this volotility thing.
First let me state that it obviously has some merit to look at but it is not the all to end all when looking at the #'s.

The volatility of an engine oil is measured using ASTM test method D5800 (NOACK Volatility % Evaporation Loss (ASTM D-5800)). A known weight of oil is heated to 250°C in a special chamber and held at that temperature for one hour.Now let me stop here for a sec.. 250C= about 482F give or take and just where in the engine is the oil going to see those kind of temps for that duration of time? I doubt the valve train does. I stated that the oil may be exposed to some high temps but then it passes back to the sump and if your oil is maintaining this type of temp, then that engine has more problems than what the oil is producing. Anyway, Air is introduced into the chamber and maintained at a constant flow rate under slight vacuum. After one hour, the amount of oil remaining in the chamber is weighed again. The percentage of oil lost is determined by comparing the remaining weight of oil with the original weight of oil.

Another important but yet not normally available test on tech data sheets for determining oils capability of oil resisting oil gelling/sludge which is what happens when you start burning off oil through the means which is measured by noak is Oxidation resisitance.

Oxidation resistance is the ability of an oil to resist the direct and indirect attack of oxygen during engine operation. The way in which an oil is formulated determines its ability to resist oxidation. Strong oxidation begins to occur rapidly after the antioxidant additive in the engine oil is exhausted, so the type and amount of antioxidant in the oil determines how long oxidation will be resisted.

This is another factor that plays on oils ability to maintain it's ability to stay in grade among other things.

Point I'm making here is, Don't push one aspect of an oil as the "selling point" of that oil as it only plays one little part and means nothing just by itself.

As for being hard pressed on extending oil drains with a mineral based oil, It can be and is being done and especially now with the newer GF-3 oils, this aspect is not as much of an issue as you would like to believe because no oil endures that much heat for that long in an engine.Not to mention, To extend the drains as Amsoil does it, your constantly refreshing the additives and base oil with new make up oil and this can be done with any decent oil. I'm not saying the amsoil isn't a quality oil but I try very hard not to instill the wrong idea that just because ONE thing quoted on a techdata sheet is good, then that oil's the one I'd choose based on that one item. Those are benched out as an extreme and dosen't represent the norm, but a way to push the oils limits for that one test.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Ted Kublin:
Bob,
You are simply wrong about the Noack volatility - it corrolates very well with oil consumption in actual use. Even though the sump temps may not be close to the flash point, there are areas of the engine, like the upper cylinder walls and valvetrain, where the oil is locally heated to a very high temp


quote:

Originally posted by BOBISTHEOILGUY:
Another important but yet not normally available test on tech data sheets for determining oils capability of oil resisting oil gelling/sludge which is what happens when you start burning off oil through the means which is measured by noak is Oxidation resisitance.


Bob,
My personal experience would go with you on this. Just a few months back I was stronger on the side of Noack being the one number that would sway my thinking in oil.
I used the Amsoil 5W30 and 0W30 and they both went down 1 quart in 1700 to 2100 miles (93 Pont. Grand Prix 3.1 v6). The latest Mobil 1 0W30 was still on the full mark after 3400 miles.
Noack of the Amsoil's mentioned are FAR better than the Mobil 1 0W30 which is 13%.
I just looked at some VoxPop Engine Oil report sheets that I have had done on Amsoil (0W30), Mobil 1 (Tri, 0W30), and the latest 5W30 Havoline (shucks it was the Equillon not Chevron), and Pennzoil.
The oxidation resistance number (ASTM D4742) was not as good on the Amsoil (201 min.) as it was on the Mobil 1 Tri (>300 min).
Even the new SL 5w30 Pennzoil # is 226 min.
So there has to be something to this in the equation also.
As we all discover here when we come with an open mind to learn, that is just what keeps happening a little more at a time.
Thank you Bob, and to all the others who help contribute to our daily improvement in the Lubrication University
cheers.gif


Good Day,
Steven
patriot.gif


[ August 06, 2002, 12:17 PM: Message edited by: BOBISTHEOILGUY ]
 
Bob,

The correlation between Noack volatility and oil consumption is well documented in the SAE literature. In fact one of the main goals of both the ILSAC GF-3 and CI-4 specs was to set more stringent limits on Noack in order to reduce oil consumption. In the gas engines this was done in order to maximize CAT and oxygen sensor life. There is also a concern that with longer standard drain intervals, you can run the engine dangerously low on oil if you use a 5w-30 with a high evaporation rate. The newer diesel engines are using cooled EGR systems, so the goal here is to reduce oil vapors that mix with soot and cause a mess in the intake system. Any owner of a VW TDI diesel can tell you this is a real concern.

This follows the experience I have had with Amsoil in a number of engines. If the engine is mechanically sound, oil consumption is practially nonexistant - even with 12k-15k drains. I am sure Georgeseq can also relate numerous situations with Delvac 1 in commercial diesels, where oil consumption was reduced by 50%-70% in comparison to a 15w-40 petroleum diesel oil.

This has nothing to do with the bulk oil temps reaching 250C, by the way ....

TooSlick
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom