Airline Pilots To carry Arms by Spring

Status
Not open for further replies.

MolaKule

Staff member
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
24,029
Location
Iowegia - USA
Pilots anticipate guns in cockpit by spring
Associated Press Newswires 11/26/02
author: Leslie Miller
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Commercial airline pilots could start carrying guns into the cockpits as early as this spring as protection against terror attacks.
But fewer than half are expected to do so.

The homeland security bill that President Bush signed Monday includes a provision allowing pilots on passenger planes to carry weapons if they're qualified
and trained.

Al Aitken, spokesman for the Allied Pilots Association, said he expects more than 30,000 of the 100,000 U.S. airline pilots will volunteer to become
"federal flight deck officers." Congress stipulated the training should begin within three months.

"It's not something that we wanted, it's not something that we're eager to take on, but as responsible Americans we realize it's something that has to be
done," said Aitken, whose union represents 14,500 American Airlines pilots.

Blake Wyttenbach, a pilot for Mesa Airlines, said he'll probably volunteer to carry a weapon, though he opposed the program at first. "I'd feel a little
safer," he said.

Polls show most Americans want to allow pilots to carry weapons.

Dan McFadden, 78, of Woodbridge, Va., said guns would have given the doomed pilots of Sept. 11 a chance to save themselves.

"They don't need to know how to shoot a peanut off a stick," McFadden said Tuesday as he waited to pick up his son at Reagan National Airport. "A
body's pretty big."

But Jill Roach, 32, of Germantown, Md., said she'd rather see air marshals on all flights.

"Then the pilots could focus on flying," said the mother of two as she waited at the airport to pick up relatives for Thanksgiving.

No federal air marshal has ever fired a weapon on a plane, said Robert Johnson, spokesman for the Transportation Security Administration, created by
Congress after the Sept. 11 attacks.

That agency was given broad authority to set standards, develop a training program and write rules for what kind of weapons will be used. The new law
also requires airlines to train the flight crew in self-defense.

Johnson said pilots won't need the 10 weeks of training that federal air marshals get. Unlike the air marshals, pilots would probably encounter only one or
two situations where they'd fire a weapon -- chiefly a cockpit breach -- and would have a much more limited field of fire, he said.

"It will be the right training for the mission they would have to carry out given the environment they're in and the challenge they would face," Johnson said.
"They're not going to be air marshals."

Johnson cautioned, however, that a money shortage may limit the number of pilots who can be trained. Congress didn't authorize any funding.

Aitken is a member of the Joint Implementation Team, an industrywide committee that has developed a plan to arm pilots. It's similar, he said, to a report
the FBI issued last year on cockpit protection.

The plan calls for volunteers to take a five-day, 48-hour training course in which they'll fire off 2,000 rounds of ammunition. At the end of the training,
pilots will act out a scenario in which a hijacker storms the cockpit.

Aitken doesn't think it will be too hard.

"I could reach over my shoulder with my firearm and hit the door without even looking," he said.

Though it's been suggested that weapons be stored in the cockpit, Aitken said pilots want to carry their guns, preferably semiautomatic pistols, with no
limits on ammunition.

After all, he said, "We give guns to USDA meat inspectors, forest rangers and postal inspectors."

That's the problem, said David Plavin, president of the airport organization, Airports Council International. For years, airports have been trying to limit the
number of people with guns who have access to planes.

"A number of us can tell you stories about an armed federal law enforcement officer falling asleep on a plane, his jacket falls open, the gun falls out,
someone picks it up and goes to another law enforcement officer, and they barely avoid a shootout," he said.

Plavin said airport managers want to know where the guns will be kept when they're not on planes and how access to them will be controlled.

"Are these guys just going to be marching around with sidearms anywhere the hell they want?" he asked.

Some contend pilots won't need guns because new bulletproof cockpit doors are to be installed by April.

However, the doors must be opened for bathroom breaks, meals, relief crews and as part of airline procedures to check equipment, Aitken said. Pilots
would learn how to deal with an attack when they're outside the cockpit, he said. They'd prefer to be trained at FBI training facilities or at federally
approved firing ranges throughout the country, he said.

"We pilots have never wanted to get into this program because we were a bunch of sharpshooting gunslingers," he said. "We're very serious minded."
 
I wholeheartedly support pilots carrying firearms. The arguments against them are the same anti-2nd Amendment sentiments out-of-touch, liberal ninnies use against everyday citizens: “They won’t be properly trained.” “It’s too dangerous.” “Flying bullets will damage instruments and flight controls.” These arguments are usually followed by the advice: “When being confronted by a criminal, just do whatever he says.” The passengers aboard the planes that hit the World Trade Center followed this type of advice. A lot of good it did them.
rolleyes.gif


The problem is, the gun-hating wieners making these arguments know nothing about firearms. They just know that they don’t like them. They’d take away firearms from police and the military if they could. For the most part, they are merely projecting their own inadequacies and failings onto others … and our pilots are better than that. Most, after all, are former servicemen. Any pilot who “can’t handle” a pocket pistol can’t handle the controls of a plane (even light aircraft!) and they should turn in their wings immediately. Pilots already have the lives of everyone aboard their aircraft in their hands … I don’t see the addition of a .38, .380 or even .45 as “over the top.”

Just leave the .50 Action Express and .454 Casull Magnums home, please.
wink.gif


--- Bror Jace
 
I recommended to the Security Agency a Glock Model 27 in .40 S&W or a 5-shot hammerless revolver in .40 S&W (no snagging on clothes when you have to put down an insurrection quickly). For the Flight Attendants, I recommemded a hammerless 5-shot .38 Special.

Aircraft fuselages and systems are more resilient than people think. Most of the flying public doesn't realize how much redundancy we put into those aircraft.

Besides, would you argue with a crew if you knew they were "packing?"

One of the other problems is beverage alcohol. In my view, it has no place on aircraft. We prohibited smoking and we should should do the same with alcohol.
 
Another case of yesterday's news. There is no way in hell a plane will be Hijacked ever-ever-ever. Grandmothers will throw themselves at hijackers. The only people who will try to Hijack now are folks-the like of the nut who tried it yesterday on a flight to France. He proclaimed he had a bomb on him.
Much more likely to bring down an airliner an on-board bombs (which for the most part are still high risk) Even better (worse) still are "stinger-type" missles-which are drawing attention lately. Don't really have the details, but last week there was a DOT meeting where the conclusion was that the threat was unstopable
crushedcar.gif
. This government does its best (and costly) work chasing ghosts-IMHO
[Mad]
.

I'm reasonably pro-gun as like many Pa folks I have a concealed carry permit .
 
Got a point there Al. Next time the will try another method.

I still think flight TWA 800 was brought down by a stinger or stinger-like missile and that aspect of the investigation was squashed for political reasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top