Originally Posted By: MolaKule
I was using the 59F temp and the JT9D as a starting point for discussion since you would not stop going off on tangents. We could use engineering STP if you like.
Yes I understand the principles of reverse thrust since I helped design the translation sleeves for Boeing Nacelles, so you need not be condencending to me or anyone else.
Apparently not according to your previous post about the air being filtered, etc.
Quote:
Let's try to stay on topic here. Using the JT9D as our basis for discussion, and using 59 F as the ambient temperature, the last HPC stage temp and the combustor inlet temp will be about 850 F, the flame temp out of the combustor will be 1970 F, the HP turbine inlet temp will be about 1900 F, the LP turbine inlet temp will be about 850F so the nozzle temp will be 400 F. Energy is extracted by the LP turbine so the temp drops across the LP turbine due to thermodynamic principles. So if the nozzle air temp is 400, there is no way the fan inlet temp can be 400 F after mixing. AGain, you are assuming that most if not all of the exhaust gasses get back to the fan stage.
I will use the Artic, (you used Arizona and IRAQ) the mixing would still produce a relatively cool air into the intake. The inlet air temp into the nacelle will be higher than 59 but not 400 F.
You are using a specific example whereas I was using turbine engines in general. Why use the JT9D instead of any engine in a worst case scenarios? If every thing is working per design then we would not have this discussion. You asked since you don't know how the oil could get contaminated and I have given you a situation where it could. Engine designs do make a different in the health of the engine. For example, if you use compressed air for reverse thrust air then the temperature will be lower. If you use exhaust air then it will be hotter. Have you ever seen a blue flame coming out of the exhaust of a jet engine? Do you think the temperature of that blue flame is 400F degrees? 650C (1,200F)is a pretty typical maximum value for turbojet engines without reheat. With reheat temperatures as high as 2,500C are possible. F-14 Tomcat full reheat temperature at 4' from the nozzle is given as 1,300C (2,372F) in the flight manual.
Quote:
Again you attempt to change topics and go off on tangents. Just admit, "I am not a formulator or tribiologist and know little about esters and additive chemistry, but I am a first-rate jet engine mechanic with a lot of training and expereince," of which I have no doubt. Your hatred of the internet as an information souce is understood.
You are the one keeping changing the the original topic from aircraft oil usage in car, to how does oil get contaminated, to how to formulate ester based oil, etc. I have never claimed to be a formulator or a tribiologist only a CW4 in Army Aviation. I do know the chemistry of the oil and if you go back earlier in this thread (post #941851) I have given some of the additives in jet oil. The reason I know about the composition of the oil and not how to make them is because, as I have stated earlier, I get the data package from the oil manufacturer for the oil used in our engines. For engine performance qualification and airworthiness qualification the manufacturer have to submit a data package of how to manufacture the engine and the specs of every thing needed to run it. That is why there is a mil-spec for turbine oil and the oil manufacturers have to meet that spec. We just don't get an MSDS or a PDS from the oil manufacturers. We get all of their qualification test data and the list of chemical compositions. The list is proprietary information otherwise I would have posted them here verbatim.
Any other off topic item you would like to discuss?