I am involved with one of the carrier manufacturers (that shall remain unnamed) and their use of our bearing in their carrier designs. Though we provide quality bearings that are as good as anybody else's in the market, I am asked to evaluate the bearings that fail their evaluation tests. Nearly always I find that the bearings are overloaded and insufficiently lubricated by design. So whoever made the bearings for your carrier may not be at fault, and it may be the poor design of the carrier.
It's an all-too-common theme I see with designs that use our bearings... the manufacturer cuts all kinds of robustness out of their product and expects too much out of the bearing. On paper, the numbers look good. But testing shows the shortcomings of their design. Sometimes they just don't get it, and it frustrates us to no end.
That's not to say that this is the case for your suburban. Only a good analysis of the bearing and differential can reveal the true cause of failure. Sometimes failure is from what we call and "inclusion spall"... meaning there was an inclusion in the steel that was in the "sweet spot" of the bearing. There's nothing that can be done about that type of failure. No bearing-quality steel is perfectly clean. It's happenstance, and this failure can happen to the best of bearings. When you manufacture a large volume of bearings, some will fail from inclusion spalling. It's unavoidable.