Ford knows how to build reliable vehicles. And occasionally they even put that into practice. However they don't seem to care enough to do it consistently well.
This is what I used to think, and surely the current state of Ford is complete and total incompetence at the management level, but as the years go by and new vehicle after new vehicle is a bigger turd than the last, I'm starting to wonder if it's also complete and total incompetence at the engineering and design level? You'd think engineering and design would've devised some workarounds to avoid the blackhole of suck imposed by their pencil-pushing management overlords if for no other reason than....pride.Ford knows how to build reliable vehicles. And occasionally they even put that into practice. However they don't seem to care enough to do it consistently well.
I remember us having a lot of those 90s explorers in for engine (cracked heads) and transmission issues when I was a service advisor at Ford in the early 2000s. I hated them at the time but now I'd love to have one.Yeah, I was hoping with all the delays and only actually offering loaded expensive models that at least it might be a tough, reliable vehicle, but I guess not.
Ford knows how to build an SUV on a pickup frame, this shouldn't be hard for them...
View attachment 114360
They certainly had some common problems, but it was also the best selling SUV in any size at that time (not in 2 door Eddie Bauer form, mine is a collector's editionI remember us having a lot of those 90s explorers in for engine (cracked heads) and transmission issues when I was a service advisor at Ford in the early 2000s. I hated them at the time but now I'd love to have one.
We never got to see the Good ones because people stopped taking them to the dealer when they got that high mileage. I'd prefer a 5 speed just because of the reputation the auto had for us at the dealership.They certainly had some common problems, but it was also the best selling SUV in any size at that time (not in 2 door Eddie Bauer form, mine is a collector's edition). The Ranger had the same components and is generally regarded as reliable. My 1994 Ranger 4.0 manual was awful compared to the two 1994 4.0 auto Explorers I have owned. The white 97 in the background is a SOHC with about 237k miles, but I think I still trust it more than a brand new Bronco.
The only reason I got rid of one Explorer was this, just not salvageable...it had something like 256k miles on it then. Someone ran a stop sign (after stopping) right in front of me. As much as they were the butt of "Exploder" jokes, they actually were really good vehicles and immediately outsold everything else for a reason. The new Bronco is just silly at this point.
View attachment 115404
Copart sold it run & drive.
I bought a 1991 Explorer XLT from my neighbor before she moved away in early 2012. It was black with the factory tint, which was basically mirrored tint in the back glass, aluminum rims, and it had 164,000 miles on it. She had it serviced religiously, she just didn’t bother to wash it, so it didn’t look good to anyone who couldn’t see past that. She shot a price of $600 at me and I jumped on it. I even asked her if she was sure because that was way too cheap. She said yes, $600. I guess the new car she had for a few months had blinded her to the Explorers worth.Yeah, I was hoping with all the delays and only actually offering loaded expensive models that at least it might be a tough, reliable vehicle, but I guess not.
Ford knows how to build an SUV on a pickup frame, this shouldn't be hard for them...
View attachment 114360
They haven’t fixed the paint in over 25 years either. I have a friend with a 20 Explorer and the hood paint is bubbling. Looks like the aluminum is corroding underneath. A never ending Ford problem.Agree, Ford has major QC problems. My son's 2020 Explorer has the dreaded cam phaser rattle and I'm concerned that my Edge will develop a catastrophic water pump leak because of the engine design.
No more Fords for me.
The 5.0 was hit a miss too. I had a 88 Bronco 5.0. Nothing but problems. Liked the looks and driving but it always needed something. So annoying I gave it upWe never got to see the Good ones because people stopped taking them to the dealer when they got that high mileage. I'd prefer a 5 speed just because of the reputation the auto had for us at the dealership.
The sohc engines were just starting to have timing chain issues at under 100,000kms when I was working there. But obviously not all of them did.
I like the interiors in the older explorers, but I'd like the rare 5.0 one would be my top pick.
I remember lots of 5.0 blowing up or just burning a lot of oil in trucks. But the ones that came in explorer's (albeit rare) seemed to be good. As well as he ho 5.0 models and most Crown Vic/grand marquis 5.0s.The 5.0 was hit a miss too. I had a 88 Bronco 5.0. Nothing but problems. Liked the looks and driving but it always needed something. So annoying I gave it up